• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危但有指征的冠状动脉介入治疗(CHiP)中的性别差异:英国心血管介入学会注册中心的国家报告。

Sex differences in high-risk but indicated coronary interventions (CHiP): National report from British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry.

机构信息

Research Department, Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, North Midlands, UK.

Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, North Midlands, UK.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(2):447-456. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30081. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.30081
PMID:35043563
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess sex-based differences in clinical outcomes following complex and high-risk but indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHiP).

BACKGROUND

CHiP is increasingly common in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice. Data on sex differences in the type of CHiP procedures undertaken or their associated clinical outcomes are limited.

METHODS

Patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent CHiP between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2017, were included. All procedures were stratified by sex. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the sex-specific adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of in-hospital outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of 424,290 PCI procedures, 141,610 (33.37%) were CHiP procedures. Overall, 32,129 (23%) of CHiP were undertaken in females. Females were older than males (median: 74.8 vs. 69.1 years). Males had a higher prevalence of previous myocardial infarction (MI) (44.6% vs. 35.6%) and previous PCI (40% vs. 32.5%). The most common variable observed in female patients undergoing CHiP was age >80 (35.4%), followed by prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (24.3%) and severe coronary calcification (22.6%). In contrast, the most common variable in male patients was prior CABG (36%), followed by chronic thrombus occlusion (CTO) PCI (34.4%) and severe coronary calcification (22%). Females had higher odds (aOR) for mortality (aOR: 1.78, 95% CI: [1.4, 2.2]), bleeding (aOR: 1.99, 95% CI: [1.72, 3.2]), and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (aOR: 1.23, 95% CI: [1.09, 1.38]) compared to males.

CONCLUSION

In this national analysis of CHiP procedures over 12 years, there were significant sex differences in the type of CHiP procedures undertaken, with females at increased odds for mortality and in-hospital adverse outcomes.

摘要

目的

评估复杂高危且适应证明确的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(CHiP)后的性别差异。

背景

CHiP 在当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)实践中越来越常见。关于接受的 CHiP 手术类型或其相关临床结局的性别差异的数据有限。

方法

纳入 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间接受 CHiP 的稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者。所有手术均按性别分层。采用多变量逻辑回归分析研究院内结局的性别特异性调整比值比(aOR)。

结果

在 424290 例 PCI 手术中,141610 例(33.37%)为 CHiP 手术。总体而言,32129 例(23%)的 CHiP 在女性中进行。女性比男性年龄大(中位数:74.8 岁 vs. 69.1 岁)。男性既往心肌梗死(MI)(44.6% vs. 35.6%)和既往 PCI(40% vs. 32.5%)的患病率更高。在接受 CHiP 的女性患者中最常见的变量是年龄>80 岁(35.4%),其次是既往冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)(24.3%)和严重冠状动脉钙化(22.6%)。相比之下,男性患者中最常见的变量是既往 CABG(36%),其次是慢性血栓闭塞性病变(CTO)PCI(34.4%)和严重冠状动脉钙化(22%)。与男性相比,女性发生死亡率(aOR:1.78,95%CI:[1.4, 2.2])、出血(aOR:1.99,95%CI:[1.72, 3.2])和主要不良心脑血管事件(aOR:1.23,95%CI:[1.09, 1.38])的比值更高。

结论

在这项为期 12 年的 CHiP 手术的全国性分析中,CHiP 手术类型存在显著的性别差异,女性的死亡率和院内不良结局发生率更高。

相似文献

1
Sex differences in high-risk but indicated coronary interventions (CHiP): National report from British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry.高危但有指征的冠状动脉介入治疗(CHiP)中的性别差异:英国心血管介入学会注册中心的国家报告。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(2):447-456. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30081. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
2
Complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention types, trends, and in-hospital outcomes among different age groups: An insight from a national registry.不同年龄段患者接受复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗类型、趋势及院内结局:来自全国注册登记研究的分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100(5):711-720. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30366. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
3
Ethnicity in Complex High-Risk but Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Types and Outcomes.复杂高危但有指征的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗类型与结局的种族差异。
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Jul 15;175:26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.03.056. Epub 2022 May 14.
4
Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in prior coronary artery bypass grafting patients.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中的慢性完全闭塞的临床结局。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 1;99(1):74-84. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29691. Epub 2021 May 4.
5
Revascularization Trends in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Presenting With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get with the Guidelines (NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG).伴有非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的糖尿病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建趋势:来自国家心血管数据注册库急性冠状动脉治疗和干预结果网络注册库-遵循指南行动(NCDR ACTION注册库-GWTG)的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):197-205. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002084. Epub 2016 May 10.
6
Complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention types, trends, and outcomes according to vascular access site.根据血管入路部位的复杂高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗类型、趋势及结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov;102(5):803-813. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30846. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死伴冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的结局。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov;11(11):e006824. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006824.
8
Vascular Access Site and Outcomes in 58,870 Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Previous History of Coronary Bypass Surgery: Results From the British Cardiovascular Interventions Society National Database.58870 例行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中血管入路部位和结局的研究:来自英国心血管介入学会国家数据库的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 12;11(5):482-492. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.12.020.
9
Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Observational Study From the Pan-London Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前冠状动脉旁路移植术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的结果:来自泛伦敦经皮冠状动脉介入治疗登记处的观察性研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 16;9(12):e014409. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014409. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
10
Sex Differences in Clinical Profile and Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion.慢性完全闭塞性冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床特征及预后的性别差异
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Apr;49:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.12.005. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of Drug-Coated Balloons in Complex High Risk and Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.药物涂层球囊在复杂高危及特定经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb;105(2):494-516. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31316. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
2
Sex Differences in Patients Undergoing Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Angina: Data From a National Registry.稳定型心绞痛患者行左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的性别差异:来自全国注册登记研究的数据。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 19;13(22):e036569. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036569. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
Narrowing disparities in PCI outcomes in women; From risk assessment, to referral pathways and outcomes.
女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)结果方面差距的缩小;从风险评估到转诊途径及结果。
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Nov 5;24:100225. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100225. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Complex and high-risk intervention in indicated patients (CHIP) in contemporary clinical practice.当代临床实践中的有指征患者的复杂高风险干预(CHIP)。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2023 Jul;38(3):269-274. doi: 10.1007/s12928-023-00930-1. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
5
Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP.在适应证患者中比较复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(CHIP)与非-CHIP 患者的介入治疗结局。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Sep 1;30(9):1229-1241. doi: 10.5551/jat.63956. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
6
Complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention types, trends, and in-hospital outcomes among different age groups: An insight from a national registry.不同年龄段患者接受复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗类型、趋势及院内结局:来自全国注册登记研究的分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100(5):711-720. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30366. Epub 2022 Sep 2.