• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)结果方面差距的缩小;从风险评估到转诊途径及结果。

Narrowing disparities in PCI outcomes in women; From risk assessment, to referral pathways and outcomes.

作者信息

Burgess Sonya N, Mamas Mamas A

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Nov 5;24:100225. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100225. eCollection 2022 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100225
PMID:38560635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10978432/
Abstract

This review evaluates published data regarding outcomes for women with ACS undergoing PCI. Data is discussed from a patient centred perspective and timeline, beginning with sex-based differences in perception of risk, time to presentation, time to treatment, access to angiography, access to angioplasty, the impact of incomplete revascularization, prescribing practices, under-representation of women in randomized controlled trials and in cardiology physician workforces. The objective of the review is to identify factors contributing to outcome disparities for women with ACS, and to discuss potential solutions to close this outcome gap.

摘要

本综述评估了已发表的关于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)女性患者预后的数据。从以患者为中心的角度和时间线来讨论数据,内容包括基于性别的风险认知差异、就诊时间、治疗时间、血管造影检查的可及性、血管成形术的可及性、不完全血运重建的影响、处方习惯、女性在随机对照试验和心脏病学医师队伍中的代表性不足等方面。该综述的目的是确定导致ACS女性患者预后差异的因素,并讨论缩小这一预后差距的潜在解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27cb/10978432/a3f2f2022402/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27cb/10978432/c213d4d48678/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27cb/10978432/a3f2f2022402/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27cb/10978432/c213d4d48678/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27cb/10978432/a3f2f2022402/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Narrowing disparities in PCI outcomes in women; From risk assessment, to referral pathways and outcomes.女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)结果方面差距的缩小;从风险评估到转诊途径及结果。
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Nov 5;24:100225. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100225. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio瞬时无波比
3
Racial Disparities in Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的女性患者临床特征及预后的种族差异
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Dec;20(12):1039-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.09.020. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
4
Intravascular ultrasound to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: an evidence-based analysis.血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(12):1-97. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
5
Culprit-only or multivessel revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Database Registry report.急性冠状动脉综合征患者单纯罪犯血管血运重建与多支血管血运重建:美国心脏病学会国家心血管数据库注册研究报告
Am Heart J. 2008 Jan;155(1):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.09.007.
6
Early versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.早期与延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的比较:随机对照临床试验的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(2):223-31. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24439. Epub 2012 May 24.
7
Sex Differences in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Insights From the Coronary Angiography and PCI Registry of the German Society of Cardiology.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的性别差异——来自德国心脏病学会冠状动脉造影和PCI注册研究的见解
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Mar 20;6(3):e004972. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004972.
8
Prognostic Value of the Residual SYNTAX Score After Functionally Complete Revascularization in ACS.SYNTAX 评分残余值对 ACS 患者功能性完全血运重建后的预后价值。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Sep 18;72(12):1321-1329. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.069.
9
Gender impact on prognosis of acute coronary syndrome patients treated with drug-eluting stents.性别对药物洗脱支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者预后的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Sep 1;110(5):636-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.039. Epub 2012 May 30.
10
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Outcomes of Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.血管内成像引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心血管结局的性别差异:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
JACC Adv. 2025 Aug 18;4(9):102076. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102076.
2
Behavioral delays in seeking care among post-acute myocardial infarction women: a qualitative study following percutaneous coronary intervention.急性心肌梗死后女性寻求治疗的行为延迟:一项经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的定性研究。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Feb 28;6:1501237. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1501237. eCollection 2025.
3
Addressing Gender Disparities in Cardiovascular Care: Guideline-Oriented PCI for Women and the Hua-Mulan Conundrum.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex-Specific Differences in Potent P2Y Inhibitor Use in British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry STEMI Patients.英国心血管介入学会注册 STEMI 患者中强效 P2Y 抑制剂使用的性别特异性差异。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep;16(9):e012447. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012447. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
2
Under-representation of Women as Proceduralists and Patients in TAVR and TMVr Procedures: Data, Implications and Proposed Solutions.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)和经导管二尖瓣修复术(TMVr)中女性作为手术操作者和患者的代表性不足:数据、影响及建议解决方案
Eur Cardiol. 2022 Dec 19;17:e27. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2022.33. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
解决心血管护理中的性别差异:针对女性的指南导向性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与花木兰难题
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Feb 28;122(1):e20240824. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240824. eCollection 2025.
4
Intravascular Ultrasound Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Complex Higher Risk-Indicated Patients (CHIPs): Insight from Clinical Evidence.血管内超声引导复杂高风险指征患者(CHIPs)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:来自临床证据的见解
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 18;25(12):443. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512443. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Sex differences in survival following acute coronary syndrome with and without standard modifiable risk factors.伴有和不伴有标准可改变风险因素的急性冠状动脉综合征患者生存情况的性别差异。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jun;114(6):681-689. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02563-7. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
6
Quality of cardiovascular care in 2024.2024年心血管护理质量
Am Heart J Plus. 2024 Aug 27;45:100449. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100449. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
The Importance of Equity in Health Care.医疗保健中公平性的重要性。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Aug 4;2(5):101065. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101065. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
Representation of Women in Internal Medicine Specialties in North America, the United Kingdom, and Australasia: Cardiology's Outlier Status and the Importance of Diversity.
北美、英国和澳大拉西亚内科专业的女性代表性:心脏病学的异常地位和多样性的重要性。
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Dec 15;185:122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.030. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
4
Sex Differences in Use of Intracoronary Imaging in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者冠状动脉内成像使用情况的性别差异
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 27;15(12):1290-1292. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.03.034.
5
SYNTAXES, biomarkers and survival in complex coronary artery disease: the intervention of secondary prevention.复杂冠状动脉疾病中的SYNTAX评分、生物标志物与生存情况:二级预防的干预措施
EuroIntervention. 2022 Apr 22;17(18):1460-1462. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00008.
6
Gender Differences in International Cardiology Guideline Authorship: A Comparison of the US, Canadian, and European Cardiology Guidelines From 2006 to 2020.国际心脏病学指南作者中的性别差异:2006 年至 2020 年美国、加拿大和欧洲心脏病学指南的比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar;11(5):e024249. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024249. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
7
Understudied, Under-Recognized, Underdiagnosed, and Undertreated: Sex-Based Disparities in Cardiovascular Medicine.研究不足、认识不足、诊断不足和治疗不足:心血管医学中的性别差异
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;15(2):e011714. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011714. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
8
Improved 3-Year Cardiac Survival After IVUS-Guided Long DES Implantation: A Patient-Level Analysis From 2 Randomized Trials.血管内超声指导下长 DES 植入后 3 年心脏生存率提高:来自 2 项随机试验的患者水平分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 24;15(2):208-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.10.020.
9
Sex differences in high-risk but indicated coronary interventions (CHiP): National report from British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry.高危但有指征的冠状动脉介入治疗(CHiP)中的性别差异:英国心血管介入学会注册中心的国家报告。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(2):447-456. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30081. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
10
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI 冠状动脉血运重建指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 18;79(2):e21-e129. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Dec 9.