• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经手术途径的女性盆底重建术对生殖器官脱垂患者的泌尿和性功能影响:一项随机对照试验。

Urinary and sexual impact of pelvic reconstructive surgery for genital prolapse by surgical route. A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, CHU Nîmes, University of Montpellier, Place du Pr Robert Debré, 30900, Nîmes, France.

Gynecology Department, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, University of Lille, Lille, France.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):2021-2030. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-05071-8. Epub 2022 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-021-05071-8
PMID:35044477
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The main objective of the study was to evaluate the rates of de novo stress urinary (SUI) and postoperative dyspareunia after both sacrocolpopexy/hysteropexy (SCP) and vaginal mesh surgery.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label study with two parallel groups treated by either SCP or Uphold Lite vaginal mesh was carried out. Study participants were ≥ 50 and < 80 years old patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage ≥2 who were considered eligible for reconstructive surgery and who were sexually active with no dyspareunia and free from bothersome SUI at presentation. Women were assessed before surgery and at 4-8 weeks and 11-13 months after using validated measures including POP-Q, Pelvic Floor Disability Index (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). Data were also collected for health economics evaluation.

RESULTS

Of the required sample of 156 women, 42 women (19 SCP and 23 vaginal mesh) were only recruited owing to the discontinuation of vaginal mesh worldwide. The median follow-up was 376 days. The rates of bothersome de novo SUI were similar in the SCP and Uphold vaginal mesh groups (15.79 vs 15.00%, OR 0.95 [95% CI 0.22-4.14]). Among 30 sexually active patients at follow-up, the rates of women reporting de novo dyspareunia "usually or always" were 6.7% after SCP vs 13.3% after vaginal mesh (p = 1). Health economics evaluation showed a cost saving of 280€ in favor of the Uphold vaginal mesh technique, but no significant difference in the total cost (2,934.97€ for SCP vs 3,053.26€ for Uphold vaginal mesh).

CONCLUSIONS

Bothersome de novo SUI and de novo dyspareunia occurred in approximately 15% and 23% of our study cohorts, with no significant difference between sacrocolpopexy/hysteropexy and anterior/apical vaginal mesh surgery. However, these results should be interpreted with caution owing to the small sample size.

摘要

介绍和假设

本研究的主要目的是评估骶骨阴道固定术/子宫固定术(SCP)和阴道网片手术治疗后新发压力性尿失禁(SUI)和术后性交痛的发生率。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、开放标签的研究,将两组患者分别采用 SCP 或 Uphold Lite 阴道网片治疗。研究参与者为年龄≥50 岁且<80 岁、盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)≥2 期、有重建手术适应证且性生活活跃、无性交痛且术前无明显 SUI 症状的患者。采用经验证的测量方法(包括 POP-Q、盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性功能问卷(PISQ-IR))在术前、术后 4-8 周和 11-13 个月对患者进行评估,并在术后 4-8 周和 11-13 个月使用盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性功能问卷(PISQ-IR)和患者整体改善印象(PGI-I)。还收集了卫生经济学评估的数据。

结果

由于全球范围内阴道网片的停用,仅招募了所需的 156 名女性中的 42 名(19 名 SCP 和 23 名阴道网片)。中位随访时间为 376 天。SCP 和 Uphold 阴道网片组新发烦扰性 SUI 的发生率相似(15.79% vs 15.00%,OR 0.95[95%CI 0.22-4.14])。在 30 名随访时仍有性生活的患者中,SCP 后报告新发性交痛“通常或总是”的女性比例为 6.7%,阴道网片后为 13.3%(p=1)。卫生经济学评估显示,Uphold 阴道网片技术具有 280 欧元的成本节约,但总成本无显著差异(SCP 为 2934.97 欧元,Uphold 阴道网片为 3053.26 欧元)。

结论

本研究队列中,约有 15%和 23%的新发烦扰性 SUI 和新发性交痛发生率无显著差异,骶骨阴道固定术/子宫固定术和前/顶阴道网片手术之间无显著差异。然而,由于样本量小,这些结果应谨慎解释。

相似文献

1
Urinary and sexual impact of pelvic reconstructive surgery for genital prolapse by surgical route. A randomized controlled trial.经手术途径的女性盆底重建术对生殖器官脱垂患者的泌尿和性功能影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):2021-2030. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-05071-8. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
2
A 3-year follow-up after anterior colporrhaphy compared with collagen-coated transvaginal mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomised controlled trial.前阴道壁膨出经前路修补术与胶原涂层阴道网片治疗的 3 年随访:一项随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(1):136-42. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13628. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
3
Sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review comparing different approaches to pelvic floor repair.盆腔器官脱垂手术后的性功能:比较不同盆底修复方法的系统评价。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):475.e1-475.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.042. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.指南第 413 号:女性 apical pelvic organ prolapse 的手术治疗。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Apr;43(4):511-523.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
5
Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.有子宫和无子宫的盆腔器官脱垂手术复发高风险患者术后1年的解剖学结局:一项比较腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术/宫颈固定术与阴道前路网状物的随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):545-555. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3702-7. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
6
Diagnosis and management of complications following pelvic organ prolapse surgery using a synthetic mesh: French national guidelines for clinical practice.盆腔器官脱垂手术后使用合成网片治疗并发症的诊断和管理:法国临床实践国家指南。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Mar;294:170-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.01.015. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
7
RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.阴道腹膜外子宫骶韧带悬吊术(VEULS)联合前路补片与骶骨阴道固定术的随机对照试验:4年随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Nov;29(11):1607-1614. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3687-2. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
8
Two years follow up of 270 patients treated by transvaginal mesh for anterior and/or apical prolapse.对270例经阴道网片治疗前后壁和/或顶端脱垂患者进行的两年随访。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jan;208:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.015. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
9
Transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse does not affect sexual function at long term follow up.经阴道网片手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂不会影响长期随访时的性功能。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Sep;240:282-287. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.027. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
10
Are Two Meshes Better than One in Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse? Comparison of Single Anterior versus Anterior and Posterior Vaginal Mesh Procedures.经阴道单平面与前后平面网片修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的对比研究:经阴道补片全盆腔重建术是否优于经阴道单平面修补术?
Urol Int. 2022;106(3):282-290. doi: 10.1159/000519818. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective comparative study on efficacy and safety of different surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse.盆腔器官脱垂不同手术方法疗效与安全性的回顾性对比研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21153. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07878-7.
2
Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Comparison of Vaginal Mesh Surgery to Vaginal Surgery with No Mesh.前位和顶端脱垂:阴道网片手术与无网片阴道手术的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 13;12(6):2212. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062212.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of primary cystocele repair by transvaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic mesh sacropexy: extended follow up of the PROSPERE multicentre randomised trial.经阴道网片修补术与腹腔镜网片骶骨固定术治疗原发性膀胱膨出的长期疗效:PROSPERE 多中心随机试验的扩展随访。
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):127-137. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16847. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
2
Cost analysis of four types of surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse in a Japanese population.日本人群中四种盆腔器官脱垂手术的成本分析。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Apr;47(4):1567-1571. doi: 10.1111/jog.14683. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
3
French validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-IUGA revised (PISQ-IR).
盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性问卷-IUGA 修订版(PISQ-IR)的法语验证。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Dec;32(12):3183-3198. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04625-6. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
US FDA rules manufacturers to stop selling mesh devices.美国食品药品监督管理局规定制造商停止销售网状装置。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 27;393(10182):1686. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30938-9.
5
Comparison between laparoscopic uterus/sacrocolpopexy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.腹腔镜子宫/骶骨阴道固定术与经阴道网片全盆底重建术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的比较
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Apr;45(4):915-922. doi: 10.1111/jog.13908. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
6
Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence.针对患有或未患有压力性尿失禁的盆腔器官脱垂女性的手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 19;8(8):CD013108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013108.
7
Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.有子宫和无子宫的盆腔器官脱垂手术复发高风险患者术后1年的解剖学结局:一项比较腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术/宫颈固定术与阴道前路网状物的随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):545-555. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3702-7. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
Safety of Vaginal Mesh Surgery Versus Laparoscopic Mesh Sacropexy for Cystocele Repair: Results of the Prosthetic Pelvic Floor Repair Randomized Controlled Trial.阴道网片手术与腹腔镜网片骶骨固定术治疗膀胱膨出的安全性比较:假体盆底修复随机对照试验结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):167-176. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.044. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
9
Evidence to justify retention of transvaginal mesh: comparison between laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and transvaginal Elevate™ mesh.证明保留经阴道网片合理性的证据:腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与经阴道Elevate™网片的比较
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Dec;28(12):1825-1832. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3379-3. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
10
Detailed Cost Analysis of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Compared to Transvaginal Mesh Repair.机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术与经阴道网片修补术的详细成本分析
Urology. 2016 Nov;97:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.05.072. Epub 2016 Aug 2.