• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

γ射线辐照和微生物群移植以区分化学和微生物昼夜变化对象草青贮发酵特性和细菌群落的影响。

Gamma-ray irradiation and microbiota transplantation to separate the effects of chemical and microbial diurnal variations on the fermentation characteristics and bacterial community of Napier grass silage.

作者信息

Dong Zhihao, Li Junfeng, Wang Siran, Zhao Jie, Dong Dong, Shao Tao

机构信息

Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Agro-grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Aug 15;102(10):4322-4332. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11784. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1002/jsfa.11784
PMID:35044686
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the contributions of chemical and microbial diurnal variations in fermentation characteristics and bacterial community of Napier grass silage, gamma-ray irradiated Napier grass harvested at 07.00 h (AM), 12.00 h (M) and 17.00 h (PM) was inoculated with the microbiota derived from Napier grass harvested at AM, M and PM in a 3 (irradiated forage: AM , M and PM ) × 3 (microbiota: AM , M and PM ) design and then ensiled for 14 and 60 days.

RESULTS

Napier grass harvested at various times had different chemical compositions and epiphytic microbiota prior to ensiling. For silages inoculated with the same microbiota, the pH values, residual water soluble carbohydrates and dry matter contents increased, and lactic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, ethanol and volatile fatty acids contents decreased in PM and M silages compared to AM silages. M and PM inoculum promoted lactic acid fermentation as indicated by higher lactic acid contents and lactic/acetic acid ratios in M and PM -inculated silages compared to those in AM -inoculated silages after 60 days of ensiling. During ensiling, epiphytic microbiota affected the Chao1 index, operational taxonomic units (OTUs) number and Shannon index, as well as the abundances, of more than half of the top 10 abundant genera, whereas chemical composition did not affect any of the bacterial diversity and richness indices and only showed significant impacts on the abundances of two genera.

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that chemical diurnal variation exerted an influence mainly on the extent of fermentation, whereas microbial diurnal variation affected more the bacterial community and fermentation types during Napier grass ensiling. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.

摘要

背景

为研究化学和微生物昼夜变化对象草青贮发酵特性和细菌群落的影响,将在上午7点(AM)、中午12点(M)和下午5点(PM)收获的经γ射线辐照的象草,按照3(辐照草料:AM、M和PM)×3(微生物群:AM、M和PM)的设计,接种上午、中午和下午收获的象草的微生物群,然后青贮14天和60天。

结果

青贮前,不同时间收获的象草化学成分和附生微生物群不同。对于接种相同微生物群的青贮料,与上午青贮料相比,下午和中午青贮料的pH值、残余水溶性碳水化合物和干物质含量增加,而乳酸、乙酸、丙酸、丁酸、乙醇和挥发性脂肪酸含量降低。青贮60天后,与接种上午微生物群的青贮料相比,接种中午和下午微生物群的青贮料中乳酸含量和乳酸/乙酸比值更高,表明中午和下午的接种物促进了乳酸发酵。青贮过程中,附生微生物群影响了Chao1指数、可操作分类单元(OTU)数量和香农指数,以及前10大优势属中一半以上属的丰度,而化学成分对任何细菌多样性和丰富度指数均无影响,仅对两个属的丰度有显著影响。

结论

结果表明,化学昼夜变化主要影响发酵程度,而微生物昼夜变化在象草青贮过程中对细菌群落和发酵类型影响更大。©2022化学工业协会。

相似文献

1
Gamma-ray irradiation and microbiota transplantation to separate the effects of chemical and microbial diurnal variations on the fermentation characteristics and bacterial community of Napier grass silage.γ射线辐照和微生物群移植以区分化学和微生物昼夜变化对象草青贮发酵特性和细菌群落的影响。
J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Aug 15;102(10):4322-4332. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11784. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
2
Effects of wilting during a cloudy day and storage temperature on the fermentation quality and microbial community of Napier grass silage.阴雨天萎蔫和贮藏温度对皇竹草青贮发酵品质及微生物群落的影响。
J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Aug 15;102(10):4384-4391. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11792. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
3
Effects of various epiphytic microbiota inoculation on the fermentation quality and microbial community dynamics during the ensiling of sterile Napier grass.不同附生微生物接种对无菌象草青贮过程中发酵品质和微生物群落动态的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2021 May;130(5):1466-1480. doi: 10.1111/jam.14896. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
4
Effect of alfalfa microbiota on fermentation quality and bacterial community succession in fresh or sterile Napier grass silages.苜蓿菌群对新鲜或无菌象草青贮发酵品质及细菌群落演替的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 May;103(5):4288-4301. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16961. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
5
Abundance and diversity of epiphytic microbiota on forage crops and their fermentation characteristic during the ensiling of sterile sudan grass.青贮苏丹草过程中饲料作物附生微生物菌群的丰度和多样性及其发酵特性。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 12;37(2):27. doi: 10.1007/s11274-020-02991-3.
6
Diurnal Variation of Epiphytic Microbiota: an Unignorable Factor Affecting the Anaerobic Fermentation Characteristics of Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrid Silage.附生微生物群落的昼夜变化:影响高粱-苏丹草混贮青贮厌氧发酵特性的不可忽视因素。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0340422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03404-22. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
7
Using a high-throughput sequencing technology to evaluate the various forage source epiphytic microbiota and their effect on fermentation quality and microbial diversity of Napier grass.利用高通量测序技术评估不同草料来源的附生微生物群及其对象草发酵品质和微生物多样性的影响。
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Oct;203(8):4879-4890. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02296-5. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
8
Effects of re-ensiling on the fermentation quality and microbial community of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) silage.再发酵对杂交狼尾草(Pennisetum purpureum)青贮发酵品质和微生物群落的影响。
J Sci Food Agric. 2021 Sep;101(12):5028-5037. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11147. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
9
The effects of additives in napier grass silages on chemical composition, feed intake, nutrient digestibility and rumen fermentation.象草青贮饲料中添加剂对化学成分、采食量、养分消化率和瘤胃发酵的影响。
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2012 Sep;25(9):1248-54. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12081.
10
The reconstitution mechanism of napier grass microiota during the ensiling of alfalfa and their contributions to fermentation quality of silage.苜蓿青贮过程中象草微芽的再形成机制及其对青贮发酵品质的贡献。
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Feb;297:122391. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122391. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic succession of the quantity and composition of epiphytic microorganisms at different growth stages on rice surface.水稻表面不同生长阶段附生微生物数量和组成的动态演替。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Nov 7;15:1451935. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1451935. eCollection 2024.
2
Epiphytic microbiota source stimulates the fermentation profile and bacterial community of alfalfa-corn mixed silage.附生微生物群来源刺激苜蓿-玉米混合青贮饲料的发酵特性和细菌群落。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Apr 2;14:1247254. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1247254. eCollection 2023.
3
Diurnal Variation of Epiphytic Microbiota: an Unignorable Factor Affecting the Anaerobic Fermentation Characteristics of Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrid Silage.
附生微生物群落的昼夜变化:影响高粱-苏丹草混贮青贮厌氧发酵特性的不可忽视因素。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0340422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03404-22. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
Addition of Organic Acids and to the Leguminous Forage Improved the Quality and Decreased Harmful Bacteria of the Silage.向豆科牧草中添加有机酸和[具体物质未给出]可提高青贮饲料质量并减少有害细菌。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 31;12(17):2260. doi: 10.3390/ani12172260.