Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution & Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstr. 43, Berlin, 10115, Germany.
Milner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Commun Biol. 2022 Jan 19;5(1):69. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02877-6.
The role of environmental selection in generating novel morphology is often taken for granted, and morphology is generally assumed to be adaptive. Bovids (antelopes and relatives) are widely differentiated in their dietary and climatic preferences, and presumably their cranial morphologies are the result of adaptation to different environmental pressures. In order to test these ideas, we performed 3D geometric morphometric analyses on 141 crania representing 96 bovid species in order to assess the influence of both extrinsic (e.g. diet, habitat) and intrinsic (size, modularity) factors on cranial shape. Surprisingly, we find that bovid crania are highly clumped in morphospace, with a large number of ecologically disparate species occupying a very similar range of morphology clustered around the mean shape. Differences in shape among dietary, habitat, and net primary productivity categories are largely non-significant, but we found a strong interaction between size and diet in explaining shape. We furthermore found no evidence for modularity having played a role in the generation of cranial differences across the bovid tree. Rather, the distribution of bovid cranial morphospace appears to be mainly the result of constraints imposed by a deeply conserved size-shape allometry, and dietary diversification the result of adaptation of existing allometric pathways.
环境选择在产生新形态方面的作用常常被认为是理所当然的,而形态通常被认为是适应性的。牛科动物(羚羊及其亲缘动物)在其饮食和气候偏好上存在广泛的差异,据推测,它们的头部形态是适应不同环境压力的结果。为了检验这些观点,我们对代表 96 种牛科物种的 141 个头骨进行了三维几何形态测量分析,以评估外在(例如饮食、栖息地)和内在(大小、模块性)因素对颅骨形状的影响。令人惊讶的是,我们发现牛科动物的颅骨在形态空间中高度聚集,大量生态上截然不同的物种占据了非常相似的形态范围,聚集在平均形状周围。饮食、栖息地和净初级生产力类别的形状差异在很大程度上不显著,但我们发现大小和饮食之间存在很强的相互作用,可以解释形状的差异。我们还没有发现模块性在牛科动物的头骨差异产生中发挥作用的证据。相反,牛科动物的颅腔形态空间的分布似乎主要是由深度保守的大小形状比例关系所施加的约束造成的,而饮食多样化则是适应现有比例关系途径的结果。