Microbiology and Virology Unit, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Department of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;41(4):573-580. doi: 10.1007/s10096-022-04408-5. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
To evaluate the prevalence of multi-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (EB) and the activity of cefiderocol (CFDC), meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), and combinations of CZA plus aztreonam (ATM), MEV plus ATM and CFDC plus CZA against them.
A collection of carbapenemase-producing EB clinical isolates (n = 1242) was investigated by lateral flow immunoassay NG-Test CARBA-5 and molecular testing. Cefiderocol MICs were determined using broth microdilution Sensititre panel. MICs of CZA and MEV were determined by the gradient diffusion method. Antimicrobial synergy testing was performed using gradient diffusion strip crossing.
KPC were the most frequent carbapenemases (83.2%), followed by VIM (9.2 %), OXA-48-like (4.3 %) and NDM enzymes (4.1%). Multi-carbapenemase producers were found in 10 (0.8%) isolates. Three combinations of two different carbapenemases were observed: KPC+VIM (n = 4), NDM+OXA-48-like (n = 4), and VIM+OXA-48-like (n = 2). CFDC showed potent activity against eight out of ten dual-carbapenemases producers, while resistance or reduced susceptibility was shown towards CZA and MEV. CFDC in combination with CZA showed no synergistic effects and only two additive effects on seven (87.5%) of the CFDC-susceptible strains. Conversely, CZA plus ATM and MEV plus ATM combinations were synergistic against all ATM-resistant strains regardless of dual-carbapenemases phenotype.
The occurrence of multi-carbapenemase producers is not uncommon in Northern Italy area. MEV in combination with ATM might be considered as a potential therapeutic option, alternative to CZA plus ATM. CFDC susceptibility testing and synergy evaluation of ATM-based combinations should be performed in the lab routine to evaluate the most in vitro active antimicrobial regimen.
评估产多碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科(EB)的流行率,以及头孢地尔(CFDC)、美罗培南-法硼巴坦(MEV)、头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)以及 CZA 联合氨曲南(ATM)、MEV 联合 ATM 和 CFDC 联合 CZA 对其的活性。
通过侧向流动免疫测定 NG-Test CARBA-5 和分子检测,对 1242 株产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科临床分离株进行研究。使用肉汤微量稀释 Sensititre 板测定头孢地尔 MIC。通过梯度扩散法测定 CZA 和 MEV 的 MIC。采用梯度扩散条交叉法进行抗菌协同试验。
KPC 是最常见的碳青霉烯酶(83.2%),其次是 VIM(9.2%)、OXA-48 样(4.3%)和 NDM 酶(4.1%)。在 10 株(0.8%)分离株中发现了产多碳青霉烯酶的菌株。观察到三种不同碳青霉烯酶的组合:KPC+VIM(n=4)、NDM+OXA-48 样(n=4)和 VIM+OXA-48 样(n=2)。CFDC 对十种双碳青霉烯酶产生菌中的八种表现出强大的活性,而对 CZA 和 MEV 则表现出耐药或敏感性降低。CFDC 与 CZA 联合使用无协同作用,仅对七种(87.5%)CFDC 敏感株有两种相加作用。相反,CZA 加 ATM 和 MEV 加 ATM 联合对所有 ATM 耐药株均具有协同作用,无论双碳青霉烯酶表型如何。
在意大利北部地区,多碳青霉烯酶产生菌的发生并不罕见。MEV 联合 ATM 可能被认为是一种潜在的治疗选择,可替代 CZA 联合 ATM。应在实验室常规中进行 CFDC 药敏试验和基于 ATM 的联合药敏协同作用评估,以评估最体外有效的抗菌治疗方案。