• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对受短肠综合征影响儿童的带 cuff 隧道式硅中心静脉导管的生存分析:来自过去的教训

A survival analysis of cuffed tunneled silicon central venous catheters in children affected by short bowel syndrome: A lesson from the past.

作者信息

Ghidini Filippo, Tognon Costanza, Verlato Giovanna, Duci Miriam, Andreetta Marina, Leon Francesco Fascetti, Gamba Piergiorgio

机构信息

Pediatric Surgery, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Pediatric Anesthesiology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2023 Sep;24(5):1158-1166. doi: 10.1177/11297298211069458. Epub 2022 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1177/11297298211069458
PMID:35081815
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tunneled central venous catheters (CVC) are crucial in the management of children affected by short bowel syndrome (SBS). This work aims to investigate the outcomes of tunneled CVC and to identify factors influencing their survival.

METHODS

All the children diagnosed with SBS and undergone a procedure of insertion of a tunneled CVC from 2010 to 2019 were included. Demographic data and surgical information about the procedures were collected. Regression models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed to estimate the survival.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients, eight males (44%), with a median length of residual bowel measuring 72 cm (IQR 50-102 cm), were enrolled. Thirty-nine Broviac CVCs were inserted with a mean number of 2.2 CVCs per patient and 13365 line-days. The overall incidence of complications was 3.2/1000 line-days, and the incidence of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) was 1.1/1000 line-days. No episode of catheter thrombosis was reported. The median survival was 269 days (IQR 82-1814 days). The survival was negatively influenced by a younger age at insertion ( = 0.29;  < 0.001), 2.7 Fr diameter (median survival 76 days;  < 0.001) and the occurrence of complications (median survival 169 days;  = 0.002). The length of residual bowel was a mild risk factor for anticipated removal (OR 1.1; CI95 1.0-1.1;  = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CVC-related complications negatively influenced the survival of the line. An elder age at insertion together with a larger CVC diameter increased the survival of the line, while a shorter residual bowel was associated with an anticipated removal due to complications.

摘要

背景

隧道式中心静脉导管(CVC)在短肠综合征(SBS)患儿的治疗中至关重要。本研究旨在探讨隧道式CVC的使用结果,并确定影响其留存时间的因素。

方法

纳入2010年至2019年期间所有诊断为SBS并接受隧道式CVC置入术的患儿。收集人口统计学数据和手术相关信息。采用回归模型和Kaplan-Meier分析评估导管留存时间。

结果

共纳入18例患者,其中8例男性(44%),残余肠管长度中位数为72 cm(四分位间距50 - 102 cm)。共置入39根Broviac CVC,平均每位患者2.2根,累计使用时长13365导管日。并发症总发生率为3.2/1000导管日,中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)发生率为1.1/1000导管日。未报告导管血栓形成事件。导管留存时间中位数为269天(四分位间距82 - 1814天)。置入时年龄较小(β = 0.29;P < 0.001)、导管直径2.7 Fr(留存时间中位数76天;P < 0.001)以及发生并发症(留存时间中位数169天;P = 0.002)对导管留存时间有负面影响。残余肠管长度是预计导管拔除的轻度危险因素(OR 1.1;95%CI 1.0 - 1.1;P = 0.05)。

结论

CVC相关并发症对导管留存时间有负面影响。置入时年龄较大以及CVC直径较大可延长导管留存时间,而残余肠管较短与因并发症导致的预计导管拔除有关。

相似文献

1
A survival analysis of cuffed tunneled silicon central venous catheters in children affected by short bowel syndrome: A lesson from the past.对受短肠综合征影响儿童的带 cuff 隧道式硅中心静脉导管的生存分析:来自过去的教训
J Vasc Access. 2023 Sep;24(5):1158-1166. doi: 10.1177/11297298211069458. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
2
Risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infections in children with tunneled central venous catheters.隧道式中心静脉导管置管患儿中心静脉导管相关血流感染的危险因素。
Am J Infect Control. 2020 Jan;48(1):33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.06.027. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
3
Tunneled central venous catheters in pediatric intestinal failure: a single-center experience.小儿肠衰竭患者的隧道式中心静脉导管:单中心经验
J Surg Res. 2018 Nov;231:346-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.081. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
4
Bedside Durable Tunneled Femoral Central Venous Catheter is Feasible and Safe in High-Risk Infants in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.经皮股静脉留置长期隧道型中心静脉导管在儿科心脏重症监护病房高危婴儿中是可行和安全的。
J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Mar;38(3):307-312. doi: 10.1177/08850666221123899. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
5
Life on the line - Incidence and management of central venous catheter complications in intestinal failure.生命线——肠衰竭患者中心静脉导管并发症的发生率和处理。
Clin Nutr. 2024 Jun;43(6):1627-1634. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.05.013. Epub 2024 May 10.
6
Line days as a determinant of central line-associated bloodstream infections in pediatric patients with tunneled femoral peripherally inserted central catheters.隧道式股外周置入中心静脉导管的儿科患者中,留置天数是中心静脉相关血流感染的决定因素。
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Jul;51(8):1481-1486. doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-05019-6. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
7
Comparison of Rates of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Patients With 1 vs 2 Central Venous Catheters.比较 1 根与 2 根中心静脉导管患者的中心静脉导管相关血流感染发生率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200396. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0396.
8
Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients.与中心静脉导管相比,外周静脉置入中心静脉导管在危重症患者中降低血流感染风险。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Nov 9;11(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01180-1.
9
Fractured pediatric central venous catheters - Repair or replace?小儿中心静脉导管断裂——修复还是更换?
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Jan;54(1):165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.023. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
10
Risk factors for unplanned removal of central venous catheters in hospitalized children with hematological and oncological disorders.住院血液病和肿瘤科患儿中心静脉导管非计划性拔除的危险因素。
Int J Hematol. 2022 Aug;116(2):288-294. doi: 10.1007/s12185-022-03346-4. Epub 2022 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related complications in children: A retrospective cohort study.儿童外周置入中心静脉导管相关并发症的危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 29;102(39):e34924. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034924.