Xu Jieying, Yong Fok Chuan, Lim Celestine Wenxian, Wong Kevin Jian Hao, Teoh Lam Chuan
Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jln Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Apr;142(4):701-705. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04317-w. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint at 40° angle has been proposed by many authors. A smaller angle of arthrodesis results in weaker grip strength of the hand from the quadriga effect. However, arthrodesis at 40° compromises other aspects of hand function including poor aesthetic appearance. This paper aims to quantify the decrease in grip strength at 40°, 20°, and 0° of arthrodesis.
Grip strengths of the hand were measured using a BASELINE dynamometer at settings II, III, and IV. Baseline grip strength of the subjects were first measured without wearing a splint. Thereafter, subjects wore thermoplastic splints to simulate arthrodesis of the middle and ring finger PIP joint at 40°, 20°, and 0°, and grip strengths were measured again. The grip strength of the hand with simulated arthrodesis was then calculated as a ratio of the baseline.
There were 50 subjects yielding 100 sets of results. The results show that average grip strength ratio of the hand decreases progressively from 40° and 20° and to 0° of arthrodesis for both the middle and ring finger. However, the difference in grip strength ratio between 40° and 20° of arthrodesis was minimal. Simulated arthrodesis of the middle finger affected the grip strength ratio more than arthrodesis of the ring finger, and compromised gripping of a smaller handle more than a wider one.
The decrease in grip strength from 40° to 20° simulated fusion of PIP joint was minimal. Therefore, in so far as grip strength loss is concerned, arthrodesis of the PIP joint at an angle less than 40° can be considered for patients with individual functional and aesthetic concerns.
许多作者都提出将近端指间关节(PIP)固定在40°角。较小的固定角度会因四联效应导致手部握力减弱。然而,40°的固定角度会损害手部功能的其他方面,包括外观不佳。本文旨在量化在40°、20°和0°固定角度下握力的下降情况。
使用基线测力计在II、III和IV设置下测量手部握力。首先在不佩戴夹板的情况下测量受试者的基线握力。此后,受试者佩戴热塑性夹板以模拟中指和环指PIP关节在40°、20°和0°的固定,然后再次测量握力。然后将模拟固定后的手部握力计算为基线的比率。
有50名受试者,得出100组结果。结果表明,对于中指和环指,手部的平均握力比率从40°、20°到0°固定角度逐渐降低。然而,40°和20°固定角度之间的握力比率差异最小。中指的模拟固定比环指的模拟固定对握力比率的影响更大,并且与较宽的手柄相比,对较小手柄的抓握影响更大。
从40°到20°模拟PIP关节融合导致的握力下降最小。因此,就握力损失而言,对于有个体功能和美观需求的患者,可以考虑将PIP关节固定在小于40°的角度。