Department of Psychology.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Nov;48(11):1698-1723. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001110. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
The forgetting curve is one of the most well known and established findings in memory research. Knowing the pattern of memory change over time can provide insight into underlying cognitive mechanisms. The default understanding is that forgetting follows a continuous, negatively accelerating function, such as a power function. We show that this understanding is incorrect. We first consider whether forgetting rates vary across different intervals of time reported in the literature. We found that there were different patterns of forgetting across different time periods. Next, we consider evidence that complex memories, such as those derived from event cognition, show different patterns, such as linear forgetting. Based on these findings, we argue that forgetting cannot be adequately explained by a single continuous function. As an alternative, we propose a Memory Phases Framework, through which the progress of memory can be divided into phases that parallel changes associated with neurological memory consolidation. These phases include (a) Working Memory (WM) during the first minute of retention, (b) Early Long-Term Memory (e-LTM) during the 12 hr following encoding, (c) a period of Transitional Long-Term Memory (t-LTM) during the following week or so, and (d) Long-Lasting Memory (LLM) memory beyond this. These findings are of significance for any field of study where being able to predict retention and forgetting is important, such as training, eyewitness memory, or clinical treatment. They are also important for evaluating behavioral or neuroscientific manipulations targeting memories over longer periods of time when different processes may be involved. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
遗忘曲线是记忆研究中最著名和最成熟的发现之一。了解记忆随时间变化的模式可以深入了解潜在的认知机制。默认的理解是,遗忘遵循连续的、负加速函数,如幂函数。我们表明,这种理解是不正确的。我们首先考虑在文献中报告的不同时间间隔内遗忘率是否不同。我们发现,在不同的时间段内存在不同的遗忘模式。接下来,我们考虑来自事件认知等复杂记忆的证据,这些记忆表现出不同的遗忘模式,例如线性遗忘。基于这些发现,我们认为,单一的连续函数无法充分解释遗忘。作为替代方案,我们提出了一个记忆阶段框架,通过该框架,可以将记忆的进展划分为与神经记忆巩固相关的变化相平行的阶段。这些阶段包括:(a)保留的最初一分钟内的工作记忆(WM),(b)编码后 12 小时内的早期长期记忆(e-LTM),(c)接下来一周左右的过渡期长期记忆(t-LTM),以及(d)超过这个时间的长期记忆(LLM)。这些发现对于任何需要预测保留和遗忘的研究领域都具有重要意义,例如培训、目击记忆或临床治疗。对于评估针对较长时间记忆的行为或神经科学干预措施也很重要,因为在这个过程中可能涉及不同的过程。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。