• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与在多囊肾上/肾上型腹主动脉瘤修复中使用开窗型内脏动脉覆膜支架相关的解剖学特点。

Anatomic characteristics associated with superior mesenteric artery stent graft placement during fenestrated para/suprarenal aneurysm repair.

机构信息

Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.

Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jun;75(6):1837-1845.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.019
PMID:35085751
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

According to the instructions for use, fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (FEVAR) with the Zenith fenestrated endograft (ZFEN; Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) requires ≥4 mm of nonaneurysmal infrarenal neck length, and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenting is optional. In the present study, we evaluated the outcomes of FEVAR with SMA stent grafting relative to SMA scallops or unstented fenestrations and their anatomic differences.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone FEVAR with an SMA scallop or large fenestration with and without SMA stent grafting from June 2012 to May 2020 after institutional review board approval.

RESULTS

Of the 203 aneurysms repaired with ZFENs, 127 were included in our analysis. Of these 127 aneurysms, 55 had stent grafted SMA fenestrations, 38 unstented SMA fenestrations, and 34 SMA scallops. Technical success was achieved in all patients. The operative times were longer (335.5 ± 16.4 minutes vs 265.0 ± 12.8 minutes vs 269.0 ± 12.7 minutes; P < .001) and the transfusion rates were higher (33% vs 8% vs 18%; P = .01) in the SMA stent graft group. However, the fluoroscopy time (65.4 ± 3.76 minutes vs 58.3 ± 3.94 minutes vs 51.4 ± 4.75 minutes; P = .05) and contrast volume (92.2 ± 5.17 mL vs 87.1 ± 6.73 mL vs 93.1 ± 5.89 mL; P = .84) were not significantly different. Anatomically, the patients who had undergone FEVAR with a ZFEN and SMA stent grafting had had shorter infrarenal neck (1.73 ± 1.18 mm vs 4.92 ± 1.16 mm vs 6.28 ± 1.42 mm; P = .03) and infra-SMA neck (10.3 ± 1.39 mm vs 23.9 ± 1.24 mm vs 26.8 ± 1.67 mm; P < .001) lengths. In the SMA stent graft group, one patient had developed small bowel necrosis after embolization of an intraoperatively perforated jejunal branch and two had developed colonic ischemia of unclear etiology with patent SMA stent grafts found on imaging. Endograft migration and SMA occlusion with bowel ischemia occurred in one patient in the SMA fenestration group. Overall mortality (24% vs 21% vs 18%; P = .82) and 30-day mortality (5% vs 3% vs 3%; P = .80) were comparable between the three groups. In addition, the incidence of type III endoleak (5% vs 3% vs 3%; P = .45) and the need for reintervention (20% vs 18% vs 12%; P = .60) were similar across all three groups. The mean follow-up duration was longer for the SMA scallop group, which can be attributed to 82% of these occurring in the first one half of the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the added technical complexity, SMA stenting enabled FEVAR in patients with pararenal and suprarenal aneurysms with high rates of technical success and no increased risk of mortality, major adverse events, type III endoleaks, or reintervention.

摘要

目的

根据使用说明书,采用 Zenith 开窗型覆膜支架(ZFEN;库克医疗公司,印第安纳州布卢明顿)进行的开窗型腔内主动脉瘤修复术(FEVAR)需要有≥4 毫米的非瘤颈长度,并且可以选择对肠系膜上动脉(SMA)进行支架置入。在本研究中,我们评估了 SMA 支架置入术与 SMA 开窗或未支架开窗以及它们的解剖差异在 FEVAR 中的结果。

方法

我们对 2012 年 6 月至 2020 年 5 月期间,在机构审查委员会批准后,采用 SMA 开窗或大开窗并进行 SMA 支架置入或未进行 SMA 支架置入的 FEVAR 的患者进行了单机构回顾性分析。

结果

在采用 ZFEN 修复的 203 个动脉瘤中,有 127 个纳入我们的分析。在这 127 个动脉瘤中,55 个有支架置入的 SMA 开窗,38 个未支架置入的 SMA 开窗,34 个 SMA 开窗。所有患者均获得技术成功。手术时间较长(335.5±16.4 分钟比 265.0±12.8 分钟比 269.0±12.7 分钟;P<0.001),输血量较高(33%比 8%比 18%;P=0.01)在 SMA 支架置入组。然而,透视时间(65.4±3.76 分钟比 58.3±3.94 分钟比 51.4±4.75 分钟;P=0.05)和造影剂用量(92.2±5.17 毫升比 87.1±6.73 毫升比 93.1±5.89 毫升;P=0.84)无显著差异。解剖学上,采用 ZFEN 和 SMA 支架置入进行 FEVAR 的患者,肾下颈(1.73±1.18 毫米比 4.92±1.16 毫米比 6.28±1.42 毫米;P=0.03)和肾下 SMA 颈(10.3±1.39 毫米比 23.9±1.24 毫米比 26.8±1.67 毫米;P<0.001)长度较短。在 SMA 支架置入组中,1 例患者在术中肠分支穿孔栓塞后发生小肠坏死,2 例患者发生不明原因的结肠缺血,影像学检查发现 SMA 支架置入通畅。1 例 SMA 开窗组患者发生移植物迁移和 SMA 闭塞伴肠缺血。总体死亡率(24%比 21%比 18%;P=0.82)和 30 天死亡率(5%比 3%比 3%;P=0.80)在三组之间无差异。此外,III 型内漏(5%比 3%比 3%;P=0.45)和需要再次干预(20%比 18%比 12%;P=0.60)的发生率在三组之间相似。SMA 开窗组的平均随访时间较长,这主要归因于研究前半段的 82%的 SMA 开窗组患者。

结论

尽管技术复杂性增加,但 SMA 支架置入术使肾周和肾上动脉瘤患者能够进行 FEVAR,其技术成功率高,且不增加死亡率、主要不良事件、III 型内漏或再次干预的风险。

相似文献

1
Anatomic characteristics associated with superior mesenteric artery stent graft placement during fenestrated para/suprarenal aneurysm repair.与在多囊肾上/肾上型腹主动脉瘤修复中使用开窗型内脏动脉覆膜支架相关的解剖学特点。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jun;75(6):1837-1845.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
2
The role of selective stenting for superior mesenteric artery scallops during fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair.开窗型腔内血管修复术中肠系膜上动脉开窗“扇贝”样改变选择性支架置入的作用。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
3
Fenestrated endovascular grafts for the repair of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms: an evidence-based analysis.用于修复近肾主动脉瘤的开窗型血管内移植物:循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(4):1-51. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
4
Maximizing proximal seal zone in fenestrated endografting: Evolution in the approach to graft configuration.最大化开窗型血管内移植物的近端密封区:移植物构型方法的演变。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Dec;72(6):1891-1896. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.03.049. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
5
Shuttering of the superior mesenteric artery during fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair.开窗式血管内动脉瘤修复术中肠系膜上动脉的阻断
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Oct;60(4):900-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.04.055. Epub 2014 May 24.
6
Two-year evaluation of fenestrated and parallel branch endografts for the treatment of juxtarenal, suprarenal, and thoracoabdominal aneurysms at a single institution.单中心 2 年随访结果:采用开窗及分支型覆膜支架治疗肾周、肾上及胸腹主动脉瘤。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.03.058. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
7
Superior mesenteric artery outcomes after fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.开窗式血管腔内主动脉瘤修复术后肠系膜上动脉的转归
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Sep;64(3):692-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.02.031. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
8
Large Fenestrations Versus Scallops for the Superior Mesenteric Artery during Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Does it Matter?大型开窗与扇贝开窗在肠系膜上动脉开窗腔内修复术中的应用:有区别吗?
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;87:71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
9
Use of the Zenith Fenestrated platform to rescue failing endovascular and open aortic reconstructions is safe and technically feasible.使用 Zenith 开窗平台来挽救失败的血管内和开放的主动脉重建是安全且技术可行的。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1017-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.038. Epub 2018 May 18.
10
Comparison of outcomes for double fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus triple or quadruple fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair in the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.双开窗血管内动脉瘤修复术与三开窗或四开窗血管内动脉瘤修复术治疗复杂腹主动脉瘤的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jul;66(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.043. Epub 2017 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Superior mesenteric artery-related outcomes in fenestrated/branched endografting for complex aortic aneurysms.复杂主动脉瘤开窗/分支型腔内修复术中肠系膜上动脉相关结局
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 13;10:1252533. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1252533. eCollection 2023.