Suppr超能文献

与在多囊肾上/肾上型腹主动脉瘤修复中使用开窗型内脏动脉覆膜支架相关的解剖学特点。

Anatomic characteristics associated with superior mesenteric artery stent graft placement during fenestrated para/suprarenal aneurysm repair.

机构信息

Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.

Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jun;75(6):1837-1845.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

According to the instructions for use, fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (FEVAR) with the Zenith fenestrated endograft (ZFEN; Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) requires ≥4 mm of nonaneurysmal infrarenal neck length, and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenting is optional. In the present study, we evaluated the outcomes of FEVAR with SMA stent grafting relative to SMA scallops or unstented fenestrations and their anatomic differences.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone FEVAR with an SMA scallop or large fenestration with and without SMA stent grafting from June 2012 to May 2020 after institutional review board approval.

RESULTS

Of the 203 aneurysms repaired with ZFENs, 127 were included in our analysis. Of these 127 aneurysms, 55 had stent grafted SMA fenestrations, 38 unstented SMA fenestrations, and 34 SMA scallops. Technical success was achieved in all patients. The operative times were longer (335.5 ± 16.4 minutes vs 265.0 ± 12.8 minutes vs 269.0 ± 12.7 minutes; P < .001) and the transfusion rates were higher (33% vs 8% vs 18%; P = .01) in the SMA stent graft group. However, the fluoroscopy time (65.4 ± 3.76 minutes vs 58.3 ± 3.94 minutes vs 51.4 ± 4.75 minutes; P = .05) and contrast volume (92.2 ± 5.17 mL vs 87.1 ± 6.73 mL vs 93.1 ± 5.89 mL; P = .84) were not significantly different. Anatomically, the patients who had undergone FEVAR with a ZFEN and SMA stent grafting had had shorter infrarenal neck (1.73 ± 1.18 mm vs 4.92 ± 1.16 mm vs 6.28 ± 1.42 mm; P = .03) and infra-SMA neck (10.3 ± 1.39 mm vs 23.9 ± 1.24 mm vs 26.8 ± 1.67 mm; P < .001) lengths. In the SMA stent graft group, one patient had developed small bowel necrosis after embolization of an intraoperatively perforated jejunal branch and two had developed colonic ischemia of unclear etiology with patent SMA stent grafts found on imaging. Endograft migration and SMA occlusion with bowel ischemia occurred in one patient in the SMA fenestration group. Overall mortality (24% vs 21% vs 18%; P = .82) and 30-day mortality (5% vs 3% vs 3%; P = .80) were comparable between the three groups. In addition, the incidence of type III endoleak (5% vs 3% vs 3%; P = .45) and the need for reintervention (20% vs 18% vs 12%; P = .60) were similar across all three groups. The mean follow-up duration was longer for the SMA scallop group, which can be attributed to 82% of these occurring in the first one half of the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the added technical complexity, SMA stenting enabled FEVAR in patients with pararenal and suprarenal aneurysms with high rates of technical success and no increased risk of mortality, major adverse events, type III endoleaks, or reintervention.

摘要

目的

根据使用说明书,采用 Zenith 开窗型覆膜支架(ZFEN;库克医疗公司,印第安纳州布卢明顿)进行的开窗型腔内主动脉瘤修复术(FEVAR)需要有≥4 毫米的非瘤颈长度,并且可以选择对肠系膜上动脉(SMA)进行支架置入。在本研究中,我们评估了 SMA 支架置入术与 SMA 开窗或未支架开窗以及它们的解剖差异在 FEVAR 中的结果。

方法

我们对 2012 年 6 月至 2020 年 5 月期间,在机构审查委员会批准后,采用 SMA 开窗或大开窗并进行 SMA 支架置入或未进行 SMA 支架置入的 FEVAR 的患者进行了单机构回顾性分析。

结果

在采用 ZFEN 修复的 203 个动脉瘤中,有 127 个纳入我们的分析。在这 127 个动脉瘤中,55 个有支架置入的 SMA 开窗,38 个未支架置入的 SMA 开窗,34 个 SMA 开窗。所有患者均获得技术成功。手术时间较长(335.5±16.4 分钟比 265.0±12.8 分钟比 269.0±12.7 分钟;P<0.001),输血量较高(33%比 8%比 18%;P=0.01)在 SMA 支架置入组。然而,透视时间(65.4±3.76 分钟比 58.3±3.94 分钟比 51.4±4.75 分钟;P=0.05)和造影剂用量(92.2±5.17 毫升比 87.1±6.73 毫升比 93.1±5.89 毫升;P=0.84)无显著差异。解剖学上,采用 ZFEN 和 SMA 支架置入进行 FEVAR 的患者,肾下颈(1.73±1.18 毫米比 4.92±1.16 毫米比 6.28±1.42 毫米;P=0.03)和肾下 SMA 颈(10.3±1.39 毫米比 23.9±1.24 毫米比 26.8±1.67 毫米;P<0.001)长度较短。在 SMA 支架置入组中,1 例患者在术中肠分支穿孔栓塞后发生小肠坏死,2 例患者发生不明原因的结肠缺血,影像学检查发现 SMA 支架置入通畅。1 例 SMA 开窗组患者发生移植物迁移和 SMA 闭塞伴肠缺血。总体死亡率(24%比 21%比 18%;P=0.82)和 30 天死亡率(5%比 3%比 3%;P=0.80)在三组之间无差异。此外,III 型内漏(5%比 3%比 3%;P=0.45)和需要再次干预(20%比 18%比 12%;P=0.60)的发生率在三组之间相似。SMA 开窗组的平均随访时间较长,这主要归因于研究前半段的 82%的 SMA 开窗组患者。

结论

尽管技术复杂性增加,但 SMA 支架置入术使肾周和肾上动脉瘤患者能够进行 FEVAR,其技术成功率高,且不增加死亡率、主要不良事件、III 型内漏或再次干预的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验