Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kakogawa Medical Center, Hyogo 675-8555, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kakogawa Medical Center, Hyogo 675-8555, Japan.
Injury. 2022 Apr;53(4):1517-1522. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.033. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
The antibiotic regimens for prophylaxis in the management of open fractures remain controversial. Although the use of aminoglycosides is widely accepted for treatment of Gustilo type III open fractures, aminoglycosides are often avoided in patients with risk factors. This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of two regimens, cephazolin plus aminoglycoside (amikacin or gentamicin) and ampicillin/sulbactam (ABPC/SBT), in patients with Gustilo type IIIA open fractures.
A total of 95 Gustilo type IIIA fractures in 90 patients were retrospectively reviewed in this study. The cohort was categorized into two groups that were treated in accordance with the institutional prescribed regimen in different periods: (1) cefazolin plus aminoglycoside (January 1, 2014-September 30, 2017) and (2) ABPC/SBT monotherapy (October 1, 2017-September 30, 2020). Cefazolin was used at 1-2 g every 8 h, aminoglycoside (amikacin or gentamicin) was used daily depending on body weight, and ABPC/SBT was used at 3 g every 8 h The antibiotic administration was continued within 3 days or until successful soft tissue coverage was achieved. The infection rate and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in both groups were assessed.
ABPC/SBT was used in 34 patients (36 fractures), and 56 patients (59 fractures) received cefazolin plus aminoglycoside for antibiotic prophylaxis. Infection developed in 2 of 36 fractures in ABPC/SBT group and 4 of 59 fractures in the cefazolin plus aminoglycoside group (p > 0.99). The average serum creatinine levels on admission, baseline, and peak during the hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups. One case of AKI was identified in each group, indicating that incidence rate of AKI was not significantly different between the two groups.
We demonstrated the non-inferiority of ABPC/SBT therapy over cefazolin plus aminoglycoside regimen for type IIIA open fractures. The ABPC/SBT regimen may be an alternative option for managing Gustilo type IIIA open fractures. Further prospective studies with larger samples are needed to verify these results.
开放性骨折管理中预防用抗生素方案仍存在争议。虽然氨基糖苷类药物广泛用于治疗 Gustilo Ⅲ型开放性骨折,但有危险因素的患者通常避免使用氨基糖苷类药物。本研究旨在比较头孢唑林加氨基糖苷类(阿米卡星或庆大霉素)和氨苄西林/舒巴坦(ABPC/SBT)两种方案在 Gustilo ⅢA型开放性骨折患者中的疗效和安全性。
本研究回顾性分析了 90 例 95 例 Gustilo ⅢA型骨折患者。该队列根据不同时期机构规定的方案分为两组:(1)头孢唑林加氨基糖苷类(2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 9 月 30 日)和(2)ABPC/SBT 单药治疗(2017 年 10 月 1 日至 2020 年 9 月 30 日)。头孢唑林用量为 1-2g 每 8 小时一次,氨基糖苷类(阿米卡星或庆大霉素)根据体重每天使用,ABPC/SBT 用量为 3g 每 8 小时一次。抗生素治疗持续 3 天或直至成功覆盖软组织。评估两组的感染率和急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率。
ABPC/SBT 组用于 34 例患者(36 例骨折),头孢唑林加氨基糖苷类组用于 56 例患者(59 例骨折)预防抗生素。ABPC/SBT 组有 2 例骨折和头孢唑林加氨基糖苷类组有 4 例骨折发生感染(p>0.99)。两组入院时、基线时和住院期间的平均血清肌酐水平无显著差异。两组各有 1 例 AKI,表明 AKI 发生率无显著差异。
我们证明了 ABPC/SBT 治疗与头孢唑林加氨基糖苷类方案治疗ⅢA型开放性骨折的非劣效性。ABPC/SBT 方案可能是治疗 Gustilo ⅢA型开放性骨折的另一种选择。需要进一步进行更大样本的前瞻性研究来验证这些结果。