Wright State University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 30 E. Apple St., Ste 2200, Dayton, Ohio 45409 United States of America.
Wright State University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 30 E. Apple St., Ste 2200, Dayton, Ohio 45409 United States of America.
Injury. 2023 Aug;54(8):110914. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110914. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
The prophylactic intravenous antibiotic regimen for Gustilo-Anderson Type III open fractures traditionally consists of cefazolin with an aminoglycoside plus penicillin for gross contamination. Cefotetan, a second-generation cephalosporin, offers a wide spectrum of activity against both aerobes and anaerobes as well as against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Cefotetan has not been previously established within orthopedic surgery as a prophylactic intravenous agent.
Cefotetan monotherapeutic prophylaxis versus any other antibiotic regimen (standard/literature-supported and otherwise) was studied for patient encounters between September 2010 and December 2019 within a single Level 1 regional trauma center. Patient comorbidities, preoperative fracture characteristics, and in-hospital/operative metrics (including length of stay [LOS], number of antibiotic doses, and antibiotic costs [US$]) were included for analysis. Postoperative outcomes up to 1 year included rates of surgical site infection (SSI), deep infection necessitating return to the operating room (OR), non-union, prescribed outpatient antibiotics, hospital readmissions, and related returns to the emergency department (ED). Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to include standard/literature-supported antibiotic regimens as a nested random factor within the non-cefotetan cohort.
The nested variable accounting for standard/literature-supported antibiotic regimens had no significant effect in any model for any outcome (for each, P ≥ 0.302). Thus, 1-year data for 138 Type III open fractures were included, accounting for only the binary effect of cefotetan (n = 42) versus non-cefotetan cohorts. The cohorts did not differ significantly at baseline. The cefotetan cohort received fewer in-house dose/day antibiotics (P < 0.001), was less likely to receive outpatient antibiotics in the following year (P = 0.023), had decreased return to the OR (35.7% versus 54.2%, P = 0.045), and demonstrated non-union rates of 16.7% versus 28.1% (P = 0.151). When adjusted for length of stay (LOS), the dose/day total costs for antibiotics were $8.71/day more expensive for the cefotetan cohort (P = 0.002). Type III open fractures incurred overall rates of SSI reaching 16.7% in the cefotetan cohort and 14.7% for non-cefotetan (P = 0.773). Deep infections necessitating return to the OR were 9.5% and 11.6%, respectively (P = 0.719).
Cefotetan alone may provide superior antibiotic stewardship with similar infectious sequalae compared to more traditional antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for Gustilo-Anderson Type III open long bone fractures.
Level III Retrospective Cohort Study.
传统上,对于 Gustilo-Anderson Ⅲ型开放性骨折,预防性静脉用抗生素方案包括头孢唑林联合氨基糖苷类药物加青霉素治疗严重污染。头孢替坦是一种第二代头孢菌素,对需氧菌和厌氧菌以及革兰阳性菌和革兰阴性菌均具有广泛的活性。在骨科手术中,头孢替坦尚未被确立为预防性静脉用药物。
在一家单一级别 1 区域创伤中心,于 2010 年 9 月至 2019 年 12 月期间,对头孢替坦单药预防性治疗与任何其他抗生素方案(标准/文献支持和其他方案)的患者进行了研究。分析了患者的合并症、术前骨折特征以及住院/手术指标(包括住院时间[LOS]、抗生素剂量和抗生素费用[美元])。术后 1 年的结果包括手术部位感染(SSI)、需要返回手术室(OR)的深部感染、骨不连、规定的门诊抗生素、医院再入院和相关急诊部门(ED)返回的发生率。还进行了敏感性分析,将标准/文献支持的抗生素方案作为非头孢替坦队列内嵌套的随机因素纳入分析。
在任何模型中,包含标准/文献支持的抗生素方案的嵌套变量都没有显著影响(对于每个模型,P≥0.302)。因此,纳入了 138 例Ⅲ型开放性骨折的 1 年数据,仅考虑了头孢替坦(n=42)与非头孢替坦队列的二分效果。基线时两组无显著差异。头孢替坦组接受的院内日剂量抗生素更少(P<0.001),在下一年接受门诊抗生素的可能性更小(P=0.023),返回手术室的比例更低(35.7%对 54.2%,P=0.045),且非融合率分别为 16.7%和 28.1%(P=0.151)。当调整住院时间(LOS)后,头孢替坦组的抗生素日总费用每天高出 8.71 美元(P=0.002)。头孢替坦组的 SSI 总体发生率为 16.7%,而非头孢替坦组为 14.7%(P=0.773)。需要返回 OR 的深部感染分别为 9.5%和 11.6%(P=0.719)。
与 Gustilo-Anderson Ⅲ型长骨开放性骨折更传统的抗生素预防方案相比,头孢替坦单独使用可能具有更好的抗生素管理效果,同时具有相似的感染后遗症。
III 级回顾性队列研究。