• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坦桑尼亚公立医疗机构现代计划生育方法中的非正规支付:有待改进。

Informal payments for modern family planning methods at public facilities in Tanzania: room for improvement.

机构信息

Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, United States of America.

Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, United States of America.

出版信息

Hum Resour Health. 2022 Jan 29;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00712-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12960-022-00712-5
PMID:35093091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8800329/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Financial access to family planning (FP) is essential to the health and well-being of women in Tanzania. Tanzanian policy dictates that FP methods and services obtained at public facilities are provided for free. However, public sector FP is no longer free when providers solicit informal payments. In this analysis, we investigate the prevalence and amount of informal payments for FP in Tanzania.

METHODS

We used data from the 2015-2016 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey to investigate whether informal payments for FP had been effectively eliminated by this policy.

RESULTS

We found that, at public sector facilities, the majority (84.6%) of women received their current FP method for free (95% confidence interval (CI): 81.9, 87.3), but this proportion varied meaningfully by facility and method type. Injectable contraception was the most commonly used method by women in the lowest wealth quintiles and was most frequently sought by these women from a government dispensary. One in four women (25.8%) seeking injectable contraception from government dispensaries reported paying a fee (95% CI: 19.5, 32.1). Among injectable users who reported payment for their current method, the mean cost at public sector facilities was 1420 Tanzanian Shillings (TSh) and the mean cost at private sector facilities was TSh 1930 (approximately 0.61 United States Dollars (USD) and 0.83 USD, respectively). Among implant users who reported payment for their current method, the mean cost at public sector facilities was TSh 4127 and the mean cost at private sector facilities was TSh 6194 (approximately 1.78 USD and 2.68 USD, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the majority of women visiting public facilities in Tanzania did not pay informal payments for FP methods or services; however, informal payments at public facilities did occur, varying by facility and method type. Adherence to existing policies mandating free FP methods and services at public facilities, especially government dispensaries, is critical for ensuring contraceptive access among the most economically vulnerable women.

摘要

背景

在坦桑尼亚,获得计划生育(FP)的财务支持对妇女的健康和福祉至关重要。坦桑尼亚的政策规定,在公共设施获得的 FP 方法和服务是免费提供的。然而,当提供者索取非正式付款时,公共部门的 FP 不再免费。在这项分析中,我们调查了坦桑尼亚 FP 非正式付款的流行率和金额。

方法

我们使用 2015-2016 年坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查的数据来调查这项政策是否有效消除了 FP 的非正式付款。

结果

我们发现,在公共部门设施中,大多数(84.6%)女性免费获得了她们目前的 FP 方法(95%置信区间(CI):81.9,87.3),但这一比例因设施和方法类型而有很大差异。在最贫穷的五分之一的女性中,注射避孕是最常用的方法,而且这些女性最常从政府药房寻求这种方法。每四个寻求政府药房注射避孕的女性中就有一个(25.8%)报告支付了费用(95%CI:19.5,32.1)。在报告为当前方法支付费用的注射避孕使用者中,公共部门设施的平均费用为 1420 坦桑尼亚先令(TSh),私营部门设施的平均费用为 TSh 1930(约 0.61 美元和 0.83 美元,分别)。在报告为当前方法支付费用的植入使用者中,公共部门设施的平均费用为 TSh 4127,私营部门设施的平均费用为 TSh 6194(分别约为 1.78 美元和 2.68 美元)。

结论

这些发现表明,在坦桑尼亚访问公共设施的大多数女性没有为 FP 方法或服务支付非正式付款;然而,非正式付款确实发生在公共设施,这取决于设施和方法类型。坚持现有的政策,要求在公共设施,特别是政府药房免费提供 FP 方法和服务,对于确保最经济弱势妇女的避孕措施至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a4/8800329/0e6f36ef9b9b/12960_2022_712_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a4/8800329/e1f1e1119749/12960_2022_712_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a4/8800329/640e23c0be32/12960_2022_712_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a4/8800329/0e6f36ef9b9b/12960_2022_712_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a4/8800329/e1f1e1119749/12960_2022_712_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a4/8800329/640e23c0be32/12960_2022_712_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a4/8800329/0e6f36ef9b9b/12960_2022_712_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Informal payments for modern family planning methods at public facilities in Tanzania: room for improvement.坦桑尼亚公立医疗机构现代计划生育方法中的非正规支付:有待改进。
Hum Resour Health. 2022 Jan 29;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00712-5.
2
Who pays and how much? A cross-sectional study of out-of-pocket payment for modern contraception in Kenya.谁来支付以及支付多少?肯尼亚现代避孕措施自费情况的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 20;9(2):e022414. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022414.
3
Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: a comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana.衡量客户满意度和计划生育服务质量:坦桑尼亚、肯尼亚和加纳公私卫生机构的比较分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug 24;11:203. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-203.
4
Informal payments for family planning: prevalence and perspectives of women, providers, and health sector key informants in western Kenya.计划生育中的非正规支付:肯尼亚西部的妇女、提供者和卫生部门主要信息提供者的流行情况和观点。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec;29(1):1-17. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1970958.
5
User fee exemptions are not enough: out-of-pocket payments for 'free' delivery services in rural Tanzania.免除用户费用还不够:坦桑尼亚农村地区“免费”分娩服务的自付费用
Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Dec;13(12):1442-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02173.x. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
6
Accessibility and uptake of modern contraceptive methods in Pakistan - a critical view on what works?巴基斯坦现代避孕方法的可及性和使用率 - 对有效方法的批判性观察?
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Nov;71(Suppl 7)(11):S20-S32.
7
Use of family planning and child health services in the private sector: an equity analysis of 12 DHS surveys.私营部门计划生育和儿童保健服务的利用:对 12 次 DHS 调查的公平性分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Apr 24;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0763-7.
8
Higher contraceptive uptake in HIV treatment centers offering integrated family planning services: A national survey in Kenya.在提供综合计划生育服务的艾滋病毒治疗中心,避孕药具的使用率更高:肯尼亚的一项全国性调查。
Contraception. 2020 Jul;102(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
9
[Some immediate results from the integration of family planning into health services and from contraceptive use].[将计划生育纳入卫生服务及使用避孕药具带来的一些直接成果]
Imbonezamuryango. 1990 Aug(18):14-21.
10
Trends and Drivers of Unmet Need for Family Planning in Currently Married Tanzanian Women between 1999 and 2016.1999 年至 2016 年坦桑尼亚已婚妇女计划生育未满足需求的趋势和驱动因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(3):2262. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032262.

引用本文的文献

1
The nature, drivers and equity consequences of informal payments for maternal and child health care in primary health centres in Enugu, Nigeria.尼日利亚埃努古州初级保健中心母婴保健中非正式支付的性质、驱动因素及其公平后果。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Nov 16;38(Supplement_2):ii62-ii71. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad048.

本文引用的文献

1
Informal payments for family planning: prevalence and perspectives of women, providers, and health sector key informants in western Kenya.计划生育中的非正规支付:肯尼亚西部的妇女、提供者和卫生部门主要信息提供者的流行情况和观点。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec;29(1):1-17. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1970958.
2
"If the Big Fish are Doing It Then Why Not Me Down Here?": Informal Fee Payments and Reproductive Health Care Provider Motivation in Kenya.“如果大鱼们都在这么做,那我为什么不能呢?”:肯尼亚的非正式费用支付与生殖健康护理提供者激励。
Stud Fam Plann. 2020 Mar;51(1):33-50. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12107. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
3
A critical interpretive synthesis of informal payments in maternal health care.
对孕产妇保健领域非正式支付的批判性阐释性综合研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Apr 1;34(3):216-229. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz003.
4
Who pays and how much? A cross-sectional study of out-of-pocket payment for modern contraception in Kenya.谁来支付以及支付多少?肯尼亚现代避孕措施自费情况的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 20;9(2):e022414. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022414.
5
Liftoff: The Blossoming of Contraceptive Implant Use in Africa.启动:非洲避孕植入物使用的蓬勃发展。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018 Mar 30;6(1):17-39. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00396. Print 2018 Mar 21.
6
Effects of a social accountability approach, CARE's Community Score Card, on reproductive health-related outcomes in Malawi: A cluster-randomized controlled evaluation.社会问责制方法(美国援外社的社区计分卡)对马拉维生殖健康相关成果的影响:一项整群随机对照评估。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 10;12(2):e0171316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171316. eCollection 2017.
7
Investing in Family Planning: Key to Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.计划生育投资:实现可持续发展目标的关键。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Jun 27;4(2):191-210. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00374. Print 2016 Jun 20.
8
Using Technology to Claim Rights to Free Maternal Health Care: Lessons about Impact from the My Health, My Voice Pilot Project in India.利用技术争取免费孕产妇保健权利:来自印度“我的健康,我的声音”试点项目的影响经验教训。
Health Hum Rights. 2015 Dec 10;17(2):135-47.
9
Barriers to universal health coverage in Republic of Moldova: a policy analysis of formal and informal out-of-pocket payments.摩尔多瓦共和国全民健康覆盖的障碍:对正式和非正式自费支付的政策分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 11;15:319. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0984-z.
10
When free healthcare is not free. Corruption and mistrust in Sierra Leone's primary healthcare system immediately prior to the Ebola outbreak.当免费医疗并不免费时。埃博拉疫情爆发前夕,塞拉利昂初级医疗保健系统中的腐败与信任缺失。
Int Health. 2015 Nov;7(6):400-4. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihv024. Epub 2015 Apr 23.