Fleischmann Maximilian, Scholl Sebastian, Frietsch Jochen J, Hilgendorf Inken, Schrenk Karin, Hammersen Jakob, Prims Florian, Thiede Christian, Hochhaus Andreas, Schnetzke Ulf
Klinik Für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung Für Hämatologie Und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Klinik Für Innere Medizin, Abteilung Für Hämatologie Und Onkologie, SRH Klinikum Burgenlandkreis Naumburg, Naumburg, Germany.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov;148(11):3191-3202. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-03930-5. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcome in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, approval of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypo-methylating agents (HMA) led to a significant improvement of response rates and survival. Further, application in the relapsed or refractory (r/r) AML setting or in context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) seems feasible.
Fifty-six consecutive adult AML patients on VEN from January 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients received VEN either as first-line treatment, as subsequent therapy (r/r AML excluding prior alloHSCT), or at relapse after alloHSCT. VEN was administered orally in 28-day cycles either combined with HMA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC).
After a median follow-up of 11.5 (range 6.1-22.3) months, median overall survival (OS) from start of VEN treatment was 13.3 (2.2-20.5) months, 5.0 (0.8-24.3) months and 4.0 (1.5-22.1) months for first-line, subsequent line treatment and at relapse post-alloHSCT, respectively. Median OS was 11.5 (10-22.3) months from start of VEN when subsequent alloHSCT was carried out. Relapse-free survival (RFS) for the total cohort was 10.2 (2.2 - 24.3) months. Overall response rate (composite complete remission + partial remission) was 51.8% for the total cohort (61.1% for VEN first-line treatment, 52.2% for subsequent line and 42.8% at relapse post-alloHSCT). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly reduced median OS in FLT3-ITD mutated AML with 3.4 (1.9-4.9) months versus 10.4 (0.8-24.3) months for non-mutated cases, (HR 4.45, 95% CI 0.89-22.13, p = 0.0002). Patients harboring NPM1 or IDH1/2 mutations lacking co-occurrence of FLT3-ITD showed a survival advantage over patients without those mutations (11.2 (5-24.3) months versus 5.0 (0.8-22.1) months, respectively, (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23 - 1.21, p = 0.131). Multivariate analysis revealed mutated NPM1 as a significant prognostic variable for achieving complete remission (CR) (HR 19.14, 95% CI 2.30 - 436.2, p < 0.05). The most common adverse events were hematological, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia reported in 44.6% and 14.5% of patients, respectively.
Detailed analyses on efficacy for common clinical scenarios, such as first-line treatment, subsequent therapy (r/r AML), and application prior to and post-alloHSCT, are presented. The findings suggest VEN treatment combinations efficacious not only in first-line setting but also in r/r AML. Furthermore, VEN might play a role in a subgroup of patients with failure to conventional chemotherapy as a salvage regimen aiming for potential curative alloHSCT.
急性髓系白血病(AML)的诊断与老年及身体状况不佳患者的不良预后相关。最近,BCL-2抑制剂维奈克拉(VEN)与低甲基化剂(HMA)联合使用获批,使缓解率和生存率得到显著改善。此外,在复发或难治性(r/r)AML环境或异基因干细胞移植(alloHSCT)背景下应用似乎是可行的。
回顾性分析了2019年1月至2021年6月连续接受VEN治疗的56例成年AML患者。患者接受VEN作为一线治疗、后续治疗(r/r AML,不包括先前的alloHSCT)或alloHSCT后复发时的治疗。VEN以28天为周期口服,与HMA或小剂量阿糖胞苷(LDAC)联合使用。
中位随访11.5(范围6.1-22.3)个月后,从VEN治疗开始的中位总生存期(OS),一线治疗为13.3(2.2-20.5)个月,后续治疗为5.0(0.8-24.3)个月,alloHSCT后复发时为4.0(1.5-22.1)个月。当进行后续alloHSCT时,从VEN开始的中位OS为11.5(10-22.3)个月。整个队列的无复发生存期(RFS)为10.2(2.2 - 24.3)个月。整个队列的总缓解率(完全缓解+部分缓解)为51.8%(VEN一线治疗为61.1%,后续治疗为52.2%,alloHSCT后复发时为42.8%)。亚组分析显示,FLT3-ITD突变的AML患者中位OS显著缩短,为3.4(1.9-4.9)个月,而非突变病例为10.4(0.8-24.3)个月,(风险比4.45,95%置信区间0.89-22.13,p = 0.0002)。携带NPM1或IDH1/2突变且无FLT3-ITD共发生的患者比无这些突变的患者具有生存优势(分别为11.2(5-24.3)个月和5.0(0.8-22.1)个月,(风险比0.53,95%置信区间0.23 - 1.21,p = 0.131)。多变量分析显示,突变的NPM1是实现完全缓解(CR)的显著预后变量(风险比19.14,95%置信区间2.30 - 436.2,p < 0.05)。最常见的不良事件是血液学方面的,分别有44.6%和14.5%的患者报告了3级和4级中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少。
本文对常见临床情况(如一线治疗、后续治疗(r/r AML)以及alloHSCT前后的应用)的疗效进行了详细分析。研究结果表明,VEN治疗组合不仅在一线治疗中有效,在r/r AML中也有效。此外,VEN可能在部分对传统化疗无效的患者亚组中发挥作用,作为挽救方案,旨在实现潜在的治愈性alloHSCT。