From the University of Florida College of Medicine; Departments of.
Ophthalmology.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Feb 1;38(2):e439-e442. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002624.
Open globe injuries (OGIs) in children can be visually devastating traumas and are a common cause of unilateral blindness in children. Three commonly used ocular trauma scores (Ocular Trauma Score [OTS], Pediatric Penetrating Ocular Trauma Score [POTS], and Toddler/Infant Ocular Trauma Score [TOTS]) can be used to help predict visual outcomes in ocular injuries. Each has strengths and weaknesses, but these scores have not been studied extensively in the pediatric population.
The medical records of all pediatric patients presenting at a single institution with OGIs from 2011 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Initial clinical presentation and subsequent examinations were reviewed. The 3 trauma scoring systems were applied to patient data to determine the effectiveness at predicting final visual acuity (VA).
A total of 15 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age at presentation was 6.97 years. Seven of 15 (47%) of the patients had a final VA of 20/40 or better. The OTS was applied to 8 of 15 patients, as the OTS requires initial VA, which could not be obtained in 7 patients. The POTS and TOTS were applied to all 15 patients. The POTS, TOTS, and OTS were all significantly correlated to final VA. Incidence of relative afferent pupillary defect and more posterior zone of injury were correlated with poorer visual outcomes.
All 3 available ocular trauma scores were effective at predicting final VA in our cohort of pediatric patients with OGIs even outside of the age ranges for which they have been created. Of all the factors included in the scores, relative afferent pupillary defect and zone of injury were most closely correlated with poor final VA.
儿童开放性眼球损伤(OGI)可能导致严重的视力损伤,是儿童单侧失明的常见原因。三种常用的眼部创伤评分(眼创伤评分[OTS]、儿童穿透性眼创伤评分[POTS]和幼儿/婴儿眼创伤评分[TOTS])可用于帮助预测眼部创伤的视力结果。每种评分都有其优点和缺点,但这些评分在儿科人群中尚未得到广泛研究。
回顾性分析了 2011 年至 2016 年在一家机构就诊的所有儿童 OGI 患者的病历。回顾了初始临床表现和后续检查。将这 3 种创伤评分系统应用于患者数据,以确定其预测最终视力(VA)的有效性。
共有 15 名患者符合纳入标准。就诊时的平均年龄为 6.97 岁。15 名患者中有 7 名(47%)最终 VA 为 20/40 或更好。OTS 应用于 8 名患者,因为 OTS 需要初始 VA,但 7 名患者无法获得。POTS 和 TOTS 均应用于所有 15 名患者。POTS、TOTS 和 OTS 均与最终 VA 显著相关。相对传入性瞳孔缺陷的发生率和损伤后区的发生率与较差的视力结果相关。
即使在创建这些评分的年龄范围之外,所有 3 种可用的眼部创伤评分在我们的儿童 OGI 患者队列中都能有效预测最终 VA。在评分中包含的所有因素中,相对传入性瞳孔缺陷和损伤区与较差的最终 VA 最为密切相关。