• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Performance of Prehospital Use of Chest Pain Risk Stratification Tools: The RESCUE Study.院前使用胸痛风险分层工具的表现:RESCUE 研究。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(4):482-487. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2036883. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
2
Prehospital Translation of Chest Pain Tools (RESCUE Study): Completion Rate and Inter-rater Reliability.院前胸痛工具翻译(RESCUE 研究):完成率和评价者间信度。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 18;23(2):222-228. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.9.52325.
3
Prehospital Modified HEART Score Predictive of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.院前改良HEART评分对30天不良心脏事件的预测作用
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):58-62. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007154. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
4
Prehospital Comparison of the HEAR and HE-MACS Scores for 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.院前HEAR和HE-MACS评分对30天不良心脏事件的比较。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024;28(1):23-29. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2142343. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
5
HEART vs EDACS Scores on Predicting Major Events Among Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome at the Cardiac Emergency Department.心脏评分与 EDACS 评分在心脏急诊就诊的疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者中预测主要不良事件的比较。
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2024;47(4):296-310. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000526. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
6
Performance of the EDACS-accelerated Diagnostic Pathway in a Cohort of US Patients with Acute Chest Pain.急诊胸痛加速诊断途径(EDACS)在美国急性胸痛患者队列中的表现。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2015 Dec;14(4):134-8. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000059.
7
Pulmonary Embolism Testing Among Emergency Department Patients Who Are Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria Negative.急诊科中肺栓塞排除标准为阴性的患者的肺栓塞检测
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;24(11):1369-1376. doi: 10.1111/acem.13270. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
8
External validation of a low HEAR score to identify emergency department chest pain patients at very low risk of major adverse cardiac events without troponin testing.低HEAR评分用于识别无需肌钙蛋白检测、发生重大不良心脏事件风险极低的急诊科胸痛患者的外部验证。
CJEM. 2022 Jan;24(1):68-74. doi: 10.1007/s43678-021-00159-y. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
9
Performance analysis considering endpoints for three accelerated diagnostic protocols for chest pain.考虑终点的三种胸痛加速诊断方案的性能分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb;64:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.11.020. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of the HEART Pathway and EDACS-ADP when combined with a 0-hour/1-hour hs-cTnT protocol for assessment of acute chest pain patients.HEART 评分和 EDACS-ADP 与 0 小时/1 小时 hs-cTnT 方案联合用于评估急性胸痛患者的诊断准确性。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Nov;38(11):808-813. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210833. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment and Application of the Hear Score in Remote Emergency Medicine Outposts in Bosnia and Herzegovina.Hear评分在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那远程急救医学前哨站的评估与应用
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 19;60(4):657. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040657.
2
Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score vs. Early Warning Scores in Prehospital Care to Predict Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Acute Cardiovascular Disease.改良序贯器官衰竭评估评分与院前护理中的早期预警评分在预测急性心血管疾病主要不良心脏事件中的比较
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Feb 17;10(2):88. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10020088.

院前使用胸痛风险分层工具的表现:RESCUE 研究。

Performance of Prehospital Use of Chest Pain Risk Stratification Tools: The RESCUE Study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(4):482-487. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2036883. Epub 2022 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1080/10903127.2022.2036883
PMID:35103569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9381651/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency medical services (EMS) assesses millions of patients with chest pain each year. However, tools validated to risk stratify patients for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and pulmonary embolism (PE) have not been translated to the prehospital setting. The objective of this study is to assess the prehospital performance of risk stratification scores for 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and PE.

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study of patients ≥21 years of age with acute chest pain who were transported by EMS in two North Carolina (NC) counties was conducted from 18 April 2018-2 January 2019. In this convenience sample, paramedics completed HEAR (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factor), ED Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS), Revised Geneva Score (RGS), and pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) assessments on each patient. MACE (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization) and PE at 30 days were determined by hospital records and NC Death Index. The positive (+LR) and negative likelihood ratios (-LR) of the risk scores for 30-day MACE and PE were calculated.

RESULTS

During the study period, 82.1% (687/837) patients had all four risk score assessments. The cohort was 51.1% (351/687) female, 49.5% (340/687) African American, and had a mean age of 55.0 years (SD 16.0). At 30 days, MACE occurred in 7.4% (51/687), PE occurred in 0.9% (6/687), and the combined outcome occurred in 8.2% (56/687). The HEAR score had a - LR of 0.46 (95% CI 0.27-0.78) and + LR of 1.48 (95% CI 1.26-1.74) for 30-day MACE. EDACS had a - LR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.46-0.81) and + LR of 2.53 (95% CI 1.86-3.46) for 30-day MACE. The PERC score had a - LR of 0 (95% CI 0.0-1.4) and a + LR of 1.38 (95% CI 1.32-1.45) for 30-day PE. The RGS score had a - LR of 0 (95% CI 0.0-0.65) and a + LR of 2.36 (95% CI 2.16-2.57) for 30-day PE. The combination of a low-risk HEAR score and negative PERC evaluation had a - LR of 0.25 (95% CI 0.08-0.76) and a + LR of 1.21 (95% CI 1.21-1.30) for 30-day MACE or PE.

CONCLUSION

The combination of a paramedic-obtained HEAR score and PERC evaluation performed best to exclude 30-day MACE and PE but was not sufficient for directing prehospital decision making.

摘要

背景

急救医疗服务 (EMS) 每年评估数以百万计的胸痛患者。然而,用于对急性冠状动脉综合征 (ACS) 和肺栓塞 (PE) 进行风险分层的工具尚未转化为院前环境。本研究的目的是评估用于 30 天主要不良心脏事件 (MACE) 和 PE 的风险分层评分的院前表现。

方法

对 2018 年 4 月 18 日至 2019 年 1 月 2 日期间在北卡罗来纳州 (NC) 的两个县由 EMS 转运的年龄≥21 岁的急性胸痛患者进行前瞻性观察性队列研究。在这个方便的样本中,护理人员对每位患者进行 HEAR(病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素)、ED 胸痛评分 (EDACS)、修订的日内瓦评分 (RGS) 和肺栓塞排除标准 (PERC) 评估。通过医院记录和 NC 死亡指数确定 30 天内的 MACE(全因死亡、心肌梗死和血运重建)和 PE。计算风险评分的 30 天 MACE 和 PE 的阳性 (+LR) 和阴性似然比 (-LR)。

结果

在研究期间,82.1%(687/837)的患者进行了所有四项风险评分评估。队列中 51.1%(351/687)为女性,49.5%(340/687)为非裔美国人,平均年龄为 55.0 岁(SD 16.0)。在 30 天内,发生 MACE 51 例(7.4%),PE 6 例(0.9%),联合结局 56 例(8.2%)。HEAR 评分的 30 天 MACE 的- LR 为 0.46(95%CI 0.27-0.78),+ LR 为 1.48(95%CI 1.26-1.74)。EDACS 的 30 天 MACE 的- LR 为 0.61(95%CI 0.46-0.81),+ LR 为 2.53(95%CI 1.86-3.46)。PERC 评分的 30 天 PE 的- LR 为 0(95%CI 0.0-1.4),+ LR 为 1.38(95%CI 1.32-1.45)。RGS 评分的 30 天 PE 的- LR 为 0(95%CI 0.0-0.65),+ LR 为 2.36(95%CI 2.16-2.57)。低风险 HEAR 评分和阴性 PERC 评估的组合对 30 天 MACE 或 PE 的- LR 为 0.25(95%CI 0.08-0.76),+ LR 为 1.21(95%CI 1.21-1.30)。

结论

护理人员获得的 HEAR 评分和 PERC 评估的组合可最好地排除 30 天的 MACE 和 PE,但不足以指导院前决策。