Suppr超能文献

急诊胸痛加速诊断途径(EDACS)在美国急性胸痛患者队列中的表现。

Performance of the EDACS-accelerated Diagnostic Pathway in a Cohort of US Patients with Acute Chest Pain.

作者信息

Stopyra Jason P, Miller Chadwick D, Hiestand Brian C, Lefebvre Cedric W, Nicks Bret A, Cline David M, Askew Kim L, Riley Robert F, Russell Gregory B, Hoekstra James W, Mahler Simon A

机构信息

From the *Department of Emergency Medicine, †Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, and ‡Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

出版信息

Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2015 Dec;14(4):134-8. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000059.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score-Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol (EDACS-ADP) is a decision aid designed to safely identify emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain for early discharge. Derivation and validation studies in Australasia have demonstrated high sensitivity (99%-100%) for major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

OBJECTIVES

To validate the EDACS-ADP in a cohort of US ED patients with symptoms suspicious for acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

A secondary analysis of participants enrolled in the HEART Pathway Randomized Controlled Trial was conducted. This single-site trial enrolled 282 ED patients≥21 years old with symptoms concerning for ACS, inclusive of all cardiac risk levels. Each patient was classified as low risk or at risk by the EDACS-ADP based on EDACS, electrocardiogram, and serial troponins. Potential early discharge rate and sensitivity for MACE at 30 days, defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or coronary revascularization were calculated.

RESULTS

MACE occurred in 17/282 (6.0%) participants, including no deaths, 16/282 (5.6%) with MI, and 1/282 (0.4%) with coronary revascularization without MI. The EDACS-ADP identified 188/282 patients [66.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 60.8%-72.1%] as low risk. Of these, 2/188 (1.1%, 95% CI: 0.1%-3.9%) had MACE at 30 days. EDACS-ADP was 88.2% (95% CI: 63.6%-98.5%) sensitive for MACE, identifying 15/17 patients. Of the 2 patients identified as low risk with MACE, 1 had MI and 1 had coronary revascularization without MI.

CONCLUSIONS

Within a US cohort of ED patients with symptoms concerning for ACS, sensitivity for MACE was 88.2%. We are unable to validate the EDACS-ADP as sufficiently sensitive for clinical use.

摘要

背景

胸痛急诊科评估评分-加速诊断方案(EDACS-ADP)是一种决策辅助工具,旨在安全地识别急诊科(ED)中胸痛患者以便早期出院。在澳大拉西亚进行的推导和验证研究表明,其对主要不良心脏事件(MACE)具有高敏感性(99%-100%)。

目的

在美国一组有急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)可疑症状的急诊科患者队列中验证EDACS-ADP。

方法

对纳入HEART路径随机对照试验的参与者进行二次分析。这项单中心试验纳入了282例年龄≥21岁、有ACS相关症状的急诊科患者,涵盖所有心脏风险水平。根据EDACS、心电图和系列肌钙蛋白,通过EDACS-ADP将每位患者分类为低风险或有风险。计算潜在的早期出院率以及30天时MACE的敏感性,MACE定义为心源性死亡、心肌梗死(MI)或冠状动脉血运重建。

结果

282例参与者中有17例(6.0%)发生MACE,包括无死亡病例,16例(5.6%)发生MI,1例(0.4%)进行了无MI的冠状动脉血运重建。EDACS-ADP将188/282例患者(66.7%,95%置信区间[CI]:60.8%-72.1%)识别为低风险。其中,2/188例(1.1%,95%CI:0.1%-3.9%)在30天时发生MACE。EDACS-ADP对MACE的敏感性为88.2%(95%CI:63.6%-98.5%),识别出15/17例患者。在2例被识别为低风险但发生MACE的患者中,1例发生MI,1例进行了无MI的冠状动脉血运重建。

结论

在美国一组有ACS相关症状的急诊科患者队列中,对MACE的敏感性为88.2%。我们无法验证EDACS-ADP在临床应用中具有足够的敏感性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
The ethical dilemma of emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain.急诊科低危胸痛患者的伦理困境。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Nov;38(11):851-854. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209900. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
10
The Fast and the Furious: Low-Risk Chest Pain and the Rapid Rule-Out Protocol.《速度与激情:低风险胸痛与快速排除方案》
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;18(3):474-478. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.12.32676. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

7
Coronary CT angiography for acute chest pain.用于急性胸痛的冠状动脉CT血管造影术。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 26;367(4):375-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1206040.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验