• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对临床试验参与方式转变的看法:基于大型在线情景模拟的调查。

Patients' Perspectives on Transforming Clinical Trial Participation: Large Online Vignette-based Survey.

机构信息

Université de Paris, Centre of Research Epidemiology and Statistics, Inserm, Paris, France.

Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 1;24(2):e29691. doi: 10.2196/29691.

DOI:10.2196/29691
PMID:35103603
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8848233/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients' participation is crucial to the success of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, recruiting and retaining patients in trials remain a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe patients' preferences for the organization of RCTs (visits on- site or remotely) and evaluate the potential impact of fulfilling preferences on their willingness to participate in a clinical trial.

METHODS

This was a vignette-based survey. Vignettes were case scenarios of real clinical trials assessing pharmacological treatments. These RCTs evaluated 6 prevalent chronic diseases (ie, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, asthma, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and endometriosis). Each vignette described (1) the RCT and characteristics of the treatment tested (ie, doses, administration routes) and (2) the trial procedures and different options (on-site or remotely) for how the trial was organized for informed consent, follow-up visits, and communication of results when the trial was completed. We recruited 628 participants from ComPaRe (www.compare.aphp.fr), a French e-cohort of patients with chronic diseases. The outcomes were the participants' preferences for the way the trial was organized (on-site or remotely) and their willingness to participate in the trial.

RESULTS

Of the 628 participants who answered the vignettes, 491 (78.2%) were female (median age 55 years), with different chronic diseases ranging from endometriosis in 59 of 491 (12%) patients to asthma in 133 of 628 (21.2%) patients. In addition, 38 (6.1%) participants wanted to provide informed consent and all trial visits on-site, 176 (28%) wished to participate in the trial entirely remotely, and 414 (65.9%) wanted to combine remote-based and hospital-based visits. Considering the trial as a whole, when the trial was organized in a way that the patients preferred, the median (Q1-Q3) likelihood of participation in the trial was 90% (80-100) versus 60% (30-80) if the trial followed the patients' nonpreferred model. Furthermore, 256 (40.8%) patients responded to open-ended questions expressing their experience with trial participation and visits to the hospital and providing suggestions for improvement. The patients emphasized the need to personalize the way a trial is organized according to each patient's needs and conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant diversity in the participants' preferences. Most participants preferred hybrid organization involving both on-site and remote visits. Participants were more likely to participate in a trial organized according to their preferences.

摘要

背景

患者的参与对于随机对照试验(RCT)的成功至关重要。然而,招募和留住试验中的患者仍然是一个挑战。

目的

本研究旨在描述患者对 RCT 组织方式(现场或远程就诊)的偏好,并评估满足这些偏好对其参与临床试验意愿的潜在影响。

方法

这是一项基于案例的调查。案例是评估药物治疗的真实临床试验的案例场景。这些 RCT 评估了 6 种常见的慢性疾病(即骨质疏松症、骨关节炎、哮喘、心血管疾病、糖尿病和子宫内膜异位症)。每个案例描述了(1)RCT 和所测试治疗的特征(即剂量、给药途径),以及(2)试验程序和不同选项(现场或远程),用于组织知情同意、随访和试验完成时结果的沟通。我们从 ComPaRe(www.compare.aphp.fr)招募了 628 名患有慢性疾病的法国电子队列患者。结果是参与者对试验组织方式(现场或远程)的偏好以及他们参与试验的意愿。

结果

在回答案例的 628 名参与者中,491 名(78.2%)为女性(中位数年龄 55 岁),患有不同的慢性疾病,从 491 名患者中的 59 名(12%)子宫内膜异位症到 628 名患者中的 133 名(21.2%)哮喘不等。此外,38 名(6.1%)参与者希望现场提供知情同意和所有试验就诊,176 名(28%)希望完全远程参与试验,414 名(65.9%)希望结合远程和医院就诊。考虑到整个试验,如果试验按照患者偏好的方式进行组织,参与试验的可能性中位数(Q1-Q3)为 90%(80-100),而如果试验遵循患者不偏好的模式,则为 60%(30-80)。此外,256 名(40.8%)患者对开放式问题做出了回应,表达了他们参与试验和就诊医院的经验,并提出了改进建议。患者强调需要根据每个患者的需求和条件个性化试验的组织方式。

结论

参与者的偏好存在显著差异。大多数参与者更喜欢同时包括现场和远程就诊的混合组织方式。参与者更有可能参与按照他们偏好组织的试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c8/8848233/7e5f4a365462/jmir_v24i2e29691_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c8/8848233/3a519c5b7a0e/jmir_v24i2e29691_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c8/8848233/7e5f4a365462/jmir_v24i2e29691_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c8/8848233/3a519c5b7a0e/jmir_v24i2e29691_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c8/8848233/7e5f4a365462/jmir_v24i2e29691_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' Perspectives on Transforming Clinical Trial Participation: Large Online Vignette-based Survey.患者对临床试验参与方式转变的看法:基于大型在线情景模拟的调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 1;24(2):e29691. doi: 10.2196/29691.
2
Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences.培训招募人员参与随机试验,通过探索患者的治疗偏好来促进招募和知情同意。
Trials. 2014 Aug 13;15:323. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-323.
3
Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验中参与者和专业人员偏好影响的概念框架与系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9350.
4
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.
5
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
6
Comparison of Racial, Ethnic, and Geographic Location Diversity of Participants Enrolled in Clinic-Based vs 2 Remote COVID-19 Clinical Trials.比较诊所招募的参与者和 2 项远程 COVID-19 临床试验参与者在种族、民族和地理位置多样性方面的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148325. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48325.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials.用于参与临床试验知情同意的信息视听展示。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD003717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003717.pub2.
9
Comparing two methods for delivering clinical trial informed consent information to older adults: singular versus stepped approach.比较两种向老年人传递临床试验知情同意信息的方法:单一方法与阶梯方法。
Clin Trials. 2018 Dec;15(6):610-615. doi: 10.1177/1740774518793377. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
10
Patient perceptions and willingness to participate in clinical trials.患者对临床试验的认知和参与意愿。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Sep;142(3):520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Providing brief information on clinical trials in appropriate formats may improve impressions and willingness to participate among socioeconomically disadvantaged people in France.以适当的形式提供关于临床试验的简要信息,可能会改善法国社会经济弱势群体对其的印象以及参与意愿。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 29;20(7):e0329288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329288. eCollection 2025.
2
Mapping the rare disease paediatric clinical trial availabilities in Europe.绘制欧洲罕见病儿科临床试验的可及情况。
Front Pediatr. 2025 May 19;13:1523847. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1523847. eCollection 2025.
3
Recruitment and retention of clinical trial participants: understanding motivations of patients with chronic pain and other populations.

本文引用的文献

1
Remote Research and Clinical Trial Integrity During and After the Coronavirus Pandemic.新冠疫情期间及之后的远程研究与临床试验的完整性
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1935-1936. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4609.
2
Fluvoxamine vs Placebo and Clinical Deterioration in Outpatients With Symptomatic COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.氟伏沙明对比安慰剂在伴有症状的 COVID-19 门诊患者中的临床恶化:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Dec 8;324(22):2292-2300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.22760.
3
Remote Monitoring in Clinical Trials During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠肺炎疫情期间临床试验的远程监测。
临床试验参与者的招募与留存:了解慢性疼痛患者及其他人群的动机
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 28;4:1330937. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1330937. eCollection 2023.
4
Patient engagement and satisfaction with early phase cell therapy clinical trials at a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease center.在一家三级炎症性肠病中心,患者对早期细胞治疗临床试验的参与度和满意度。
Stem Cell Reports. 2024 Apr 9;19(4):435-442. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.02.008. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
5
Narrative review of telemedicine applications in decentralized research.远程医疗在分散式研究中的应用叙述性综述
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jan 22;8(1):e30. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.3. eCollection 2024.
6
Legacy lessons from the COVID-19 era to improve trial participation and retention: Views from trial participants, PPIE contributors and trial staff across the NIHR portfolio.从 COVID-19 时代吸取的经验教训,以改善试验参与和保留率:来自试验参与者、NIHR 组合中的 PPIE 贡献者和试验工作人员的观点。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 21;19(2):e0296343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296343. eCollection 2024.
7
Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned.试验创新网络中的去中心化临床试验:价值、策略及经验教训
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jul 25;7(1):e170. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.597. eCollection 2023.
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Sep;13(5):838-841. doi: 10.1111/cts.12834. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
4
COllaborative open platform E-cohorts for research acceleration in trials and epidemiology.协作式开放平台 E 队列研究加速临床试验和流行病学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;124:139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 May 5.
5
An embedded mixed-methods study highlighted a lack of discussions on retention in clinical trial consultations.一项嵌入式混合方法研究强调了在临床试验咨询中缺乏关于保留问题的讨论。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
6
The research burden of randomized controlled trial participation: a systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence.随机对照试验参与的研究负担:定性证据的系统主题综合分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Jan 20;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1476-5.
7
Patients' views of wearable devices and AI in healthcare: findings from the ComPaRe e-cohort.患者对医疗保健中可穿戴设备和人工智能的看法:来自ComPaRe电子队列的研究结果。
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Jun 14;2:53. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0132-y. eCollection 2019.
8
A Qualitative Study Exploring Barriers and Facilitators of Enrolling Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Trials and Biobanking.一项探索临床试验和生物样本库中纳入代表性不足人群的障碍与促进因素的定性研究。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Apr 30;7:74. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00074. eCollection 2019.
9
Patients' perspective on how to improve the care of people with chronic conditions in France: a citizen science study within the ComPaRe e-cohort.法国改善慢性病患者护理的患者视角:ComPaRe e 队列中的公民科学研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Nov;28(11):875-886. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008593. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
Telemedicine-Enabled Clinical Trial of Metformin in Patients With Prostate Cancer.一项针对前列腺癌患者的二甲双胍远程医疗辅助临床试验。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2017 Nov;1:1-10. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00044.