Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Lung. 2022 Apr;200(2):153-159. doi: 10.1007/s00408-022-00513-6. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is an accepted alternative to surgical lung biopsy (SLB) for diagnosing diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD) that is less invasive and results in comparable diagnostic yields. Performing lung biopsies on hospitalized patients, however, has increased risk due to the patient's underlying disease severity. Data evaluating the safety and efficacy of TBLC in hospitalized patients are limited. We present a comparison of TBLC for hospitalized and outpatients and provide the safety and diagnostic yields in these populations.
Demographic data, pulmonary function values, chest imaging pattern, procedural information, and diagnosis were recorded from enrolled patients. Complications from the procedure were the primary outcomes and diagnostic yield was the secondary outcome.
77 patients (n = 22 hospitalized vs n = 55 outpatient) underwent TBLC during the study period. Comparing adverse events between hospitalized and outpatients revealed no statistically significant differences in pneumothorax (9%, n = 2 vs 5%,n = 3), tube thoracostomy placement (5%, n = 1 vs 2%, n = 1), grade 2 bleeding (9%, n = 2 vs 0%, n = 0), escalation in level of care (5%, n = 1 vs 0%, n = 0), 30-day mortality (9%, n = 2 vs 2%, n = 1), and 60-day mortality (9%, n = 2 vs 4%, n = 2) (p > 0.05 for all). No deaths were attributed to the procedure. 95% of cases received a multidisciplinary conference diagnosis (hospitalized 100%, n = 22 vs outpatients 93%, n = 51, p = 0.32).
Our experience supports that TBLC may be a safe and effective modality for acutely ill-hospitalized patients with DPLD. Further efforts to enhance procedural safety and to determine the impact of an expedited tissue diagnosis on patient outcomes are needed.
经支气管肺冷冻活检(TBLC)是一种用于诊断弥漫性实质性肺疾病(DPLD)的替代方法,与外科肺活检(SLB)相比,该方法具有侵袭性更小、诊断效果相当的特点。然而,对住院患者进行肺活检由于患者基础疾病的严重程度增加而具有更高的风险。目前评估住院患者进行 TBLC 的安全性和有效性的数据有限。我们比较了住院和门诊患者的 TBLC,并提供了这两个群体的安全性和诊断效果。
从入组患者中记录人口统计学数据、肺功能值、胸部影像学模式、程序信息和诊断。主要结局为该程序的并发症,次要结局为诊断率。
在研究期间,77 例患者(n=22 例住院患者与 n=55 例门诊患者)接受了 TBLC。比较住院和门诊患者的不良事件发现,气胸(9%,n=2 例与 5%,n=3 例)、胸腔引流管放置(5%,n=1 例与 2%,n=1 例)、2 级出血(9%,n=2 例与 0%,n=0 例)、治疗级别升级(5%,n=1 例与 0%,n=0 例)、30 天死亡率(9%,n=2 例与 2%,n=1 例)和 60 天死亡率(9%,n=2 例与 4%,n=2 例)无统计学显著差异(所有 p>0.05)。无患者的死亡归因于该操作。95%的病例获得了多学科会议诊断(住院患者 100%,n=22 例与门诊患者 93%,n=51 例,p=0.32)。
我们的经验支持 TBLC 可能是一种安全有效的方法,适用于患有 DPLD 的急性住院重症患者。需要进一步努力提高程序安全性,并确定快速组织诊断对患者结局的影响。