Suppr超能文献

医患决策辅助工具对医患对话的潜在影响:荷兰和美国医学专家经验的定性研究。

Potential impact of encounter patient decision aids on the patient-clinician dialogue: a qualitative study on Dutch and American medical specialists' experiences.

机构信息

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of IQ healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e048146. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048146.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the experiences among Dutch and American clinicians on the impact of using encounter patient decision aids (ePDAs) on their clinical practice, and subsequently to formulate recommendations for sustained ePDA use in clinical practice.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with clinicians who used 11 different ePDAs (applicable to their specialty) for 3 months after a short training. The verbatim transcribed interviews were coded with thematic analysis by six researchers via ATLAS.ti.

SETTING

Nine hospitals in the Netherlands and two hospitals in the USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five clinicians were interviewed: 16 Dutch medical specialists from four different disciplines (gynaecologists, ear-nose-throat specialists, neurologists and orthopaedic surgeon), 5 American gynaecologists and 4 American gynaecology medical trainees.

RESULTS

The interviews showed that the ePDA potentially impacted the patient-clinician dialogue in several ways. We identified six themes that illustrate this: that is, (1) communication style, for example, structuring the conversation; (2) the patient's role, for example, encouraging patients to ask more questions; (3) the clinician's role, for example, prompting clinicians to discuss more information; (4) workflow, for example, familiarity with the ePDA's content helped to integrate it into practice; (5) shared decision-making (SDM), for example, mixed experiences whether the ePDA contributed to SDM; and (6) content of the ePDA. Recommendations to possibly improve ePDA use based on the clinician's experiences: (1) add pictorial health information to the ePDA instead of text only and (2) instruct clinicians how to use the ePDA in a flexible (depending on their discipline and setting) and personalised way adapting the ePDA to the patients' needs (e.g., mark off irrelevant options).

CONCLUSIONS

ePDAs contributed to the patient-clinician dialogue in several ways according to medical specialists. A flexible and personalised approach appeared appropriate to integrate the use of ePDAs into the clinician's workflow, and customise their use to individual patients' needs.

摘要

目的

考察荷兰和美国临床医生在使用门诊患者决策辅助工具(ePDA)对其临床实践的影响方面的经验,继而制定在临床实践中持续使用 ePDA 的建议。

设计

使用半结构化访谈对在接受短期培训后使用 11 种不同 ePDA(适用于其专业)的临床医生进行定性研究。六名研究人员使用 ATLAS.ti 通过主题分析对逐字记录的访谈进行编码。

地点

荷兰的 9 家医院和美国的 2 家医院。

参与者

对 25 名临床医生进行了访谈:来自四个不同学科(妇科医生、耳鼻喉科专家、神经科医生和骨科医生)的 16 名荷兰医学专家、5 名美国妇科医生和 4 名美国妇科医生实习生。

结果

访谈显示,ePDA 可能以多种方式影响医患对话。我们确定了六个主题来说明这一点:(1)沟通方式,例如,结构化对话;(2)患者角色,例如,鼓励患者提出更多问题;(3)临床医生角色,例如,提示临床医生讨论更多信息;(4)工作流程,例如,熟悉 ePDA 的内容有助于将其融入实践;(5)共享决策(SDM),例如,对 ePDA 是否有助于 SDM 的经验不一;以及(6)ePDA 的内容。基于临床医生的经验,提出了一些可能改善 ePDA 使用的建议:(1)在 ePDA 中添加图片健康信息而不仅仅是文本,以及(2)以灵活的方式(取决于他们的学科和环境)并个性化地指导临床医生如何使用 ePDA,根据患者的需求调整 ePDA(例如,标记掉不相关的选项)。

结论

根据医学专家的说法,ePDA 以多种方式促进了医患对话。灵活和个性化的方法似乎适合将 ePDA 的使用融入临床医生的工作流程,并根据个别患者的需求定制其使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/940a/8808398/4f16af645f21/bmjopen-2020-048146f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验