Department of Psychology and Philosophy, Sam Houston State University, TX, Huntsville, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 May;30(5):4477-4484. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06861-6. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
This study examined self-reported and actigraphy-assessed sleep and depression as moderators of the effect of a Tibetan yoga intervention on sleep and depression among women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer. This is a secondary analysis of an RCT examining a 4-session Tibetan yoga program (TYP; n = 74) versus stretching program (STP; n = 68) or usual care (UC; n = 85) on self-reported sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), actigraphy-assessed sleep efficiency (SE)) and depression (Centers for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; CES-D) for women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer. Data were collected at baseline and 1-week and 3-month post-intervention. Baseline PSQI, actigraphy-SE, and CES-D were examined as moderators of the effect of group on PSQI, actigraphy-SE, and CES-D 1 week and 3 months after treatment. There was a significant baseline actigraphy-SE × group effect on PSQI at 1 week (p < .001) and 3 months (p = .002) and on CES-D at 3 months (p = .049). Specifically, the negative association of baseline actigraphy-SE with subsequent PSQI and CES-D was buffered for women in the TYP and, to a lesser extent in STP, compared to those in the UC. Baseline PSQI and CES-D were not significant moderators of the effect of group on any outcome. Behaviorally assessed sleep may be a more robust indicator of which patients are most appropriate for a yoga intervention than self-reported sleep quality. Women with poor sleep efficiency may derive the greatest benefit in terms of sleep quality and mood from a yoga intervention.
本研究考察了自我报告和活动记录仪评估的睡眠和抑郁作为藏族瑜伽干预对乳腺癌化疗女性睡眠和抑郁影响的调节剂。这是一项 RCT 的二次分析,该 RCT 考察了 4 节藏族瑜伽课程 (TYP;n=74) 与拉伸课程 (STP;n=68) 或常规护理 (UC;n=85) 对自我报告睡眠 (匹兹堡睡眠质量指数 (PSQI) 、活动记录仪评估的睡眠效率 (SE)) 和抑郁 (流行病学研究中心抑郁量表;CES-D) 的影响,对象为乳腺癌化疗女性。数据在基线、干预后 1 周和 3 个月收集。基线 PSQI、活动记录仪 SE 和 CES-D 被用作组对 PSQI、活动记录仪 SE 和 CES-D 的影响的调节剂,在治疗后 1 周和 3 个月评估。基线活动记录仪 SE 和组在 1 周 (p<.001) 和 3 个月 (p=.002) 时 PSQI 以及 3 个月时 CES-D 上有显著的交互作用 (p=.049)。具体而言,与 UC 相比,TYP 和 STP 中的女性,基线活动记录仪 SE 与随后的 PSQI 和 CES-D 的负相关关系得到缓冲。基线 PSQI 和 CES-D 不是组对任何结果影响的显著调节剂。与自我报告的睡眠质量相比,行为评估的睡眠可能是预测哪些患者最适合瑜伽干预的更可靠指标。睡眠效率差的女性可能会从瑜伽干预中获得最大的睡眠质量和情绪改善。