• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治愈测试及其他:热消融术优于 LLETZ 在治疗高级别 CIN 中的优势。

Test of cure and beyond: superiority of thermal ablation over LLETZ in the treatment of high-grade CIN.

机构信息

University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;306(5):1815-1820. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06409-3. Epub 2022 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-022-06409-3
PMID:35107616
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9519675/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Among the treatment modalities for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), large-loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) is the commonest offered in the UK, whereas thermal ablation (TA) has not been common in several decades, despite several notable advantages. TA and LLETZ are both routinely undertaken in our colposcopy unit, and extensive follow-up data have been used to interrogate outcomes between the two modalities and determine whether one modality may be preferred over the other.

METHODS

Up to 8 years of follow-up data (cytology and histology) were collected for patients who have undergone LLETZ or TA and failed post-treatment test of cure (ToC). These data were analysed and used to plot Kaplan-Meier survival curves, in order to compare outcomes: negative cytology, dyskaryosis, low- and high-grade CIN and invasive squamous cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

i) Very few women treated with TA developed recurrent high-grade CIN in the follow-up period; (ii) LLETZ-treated women had a significantly higher rate of recurrence than those treated by TA; (iii) women who failed both virology and cytology components of post-treatment ToC had higher recurrence than those who failed only one, and the rate of recurrence was highest in those treated by LLETZ (> 65%).

CONCLUSION

TA is an effective treatment of high-grade CIN, with a high chance of achieving double-negative ToC and low recurrence relative to LLETZ. We recommend the wider adoption of TA, so that young women of reproductive age have a choice of treatment with no reported adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes.

摘要

目的

在治疗高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的方法中,英国最常采用的是转化区大环形电切术(LLETZ),而热消融(TA)在过去几十年中并不常见,尽管它有一些显著的优势。TA 和 LLETZ 都是我们阴道镜检查单位常规采用的方法,我们利用广泛的随访数据来探讨两种方法的结果,并确定是否一种方法可能优于另一种。

方法

我们收集了接受 LLETZ 或 TA 治疗但在治疗后转阴测试(ToC)失败的患者长达 8 年的随访数据(细胞学和组织学)。我们对这些数据进行了分析,并使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线进行绘图,以比较两种方法的结果:细胞学阴性、不典型增生、低级别和高级别 CIN 以及浸润性鳞状细胞癌。

结果

i)接受 TA 治疗的女性在随访期间很少出现高级别 CIN 的复发;ii)与接受 TA 治疗的女性相比,接受 LLETZ 治疗的女性复发率明显更高;iii)在接受治疗后 ToC 中同时检测到病毒学和细胞学异常的女性比仅一项异常的女性复发率更高,而在接受 LLETZ 治疗的女性中复发率最高(>65%)。

结论

TA 是治疗高级别 CIN 的有效方法,与 LLETZ 相比,TA 治疗有更高的机会实现双重阴性 ToC,且复发率较低。我们建议更广泛地采用 TA,以便生育年龄的年轻女性有治疗选择,并且不会对妊娠结局产生任何已知的不良影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecd8/9519675/ce3bcd179f36/404_2022_6409_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecd8/9519675/6427e2148b9b/404_2022_6409_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecd8/9519675/8b209c6d8b60/404_2022_6409_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecd8/9519675/ce3bcd179f36/404_2022_6409_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecd8/9519675/6427e2148b9b/404_2022_6409_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecd8/9519675/8b209c6d8b60/404_2022_6409_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecd8/9519675/ce3bcd179f36/404_2022_6409_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Test of cure and beyond: superiority of thermal ablation over LLETZ in the treatment of high-grade CIN.治愈测试及其他:热消融术优于 LLETZ 在治疗高级别 CIN 中的优势。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;306(5):1815-1820. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06409-3. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
Does LLETZ excision margin status predict residual disease in women who have undergone post-treatment cervical cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus testing?在接受治疗后宫颈细胞学检查和高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测的女性中,宫颈环形电切术(LLETZ)切缘状态能否预测残留疾病?
Cytopathology. 2016 Jun;27(3):210-7. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12260. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
3
Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.阴道镜测量的小病灶大小可能预测转化区大环形切除术标本中不存在宫颈上皮内瘤变。
BJOG. 2017 Feb;124(3):495-502. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14247. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
4
Efficacy of point-of-care thermal ablation among high-risk human papillomavirus positive women in China.中国高危型人乳头瘤病毒阳性女性行即时治疗性热消融术的疗效。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Mar 15;148(6):1419-1427. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33290. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Follow-up strategies after treatment (large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) test.宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)治疗后(转化区大环形切除术(LLETZ))的随访策略:人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 6;1(1):CD010757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010757.pub2.
6
Effectiveness of cold coagulation in treating high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the human papillomavirus evidence of cure.冷凝治疗高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的有效性:人乳头瘤病毒治愈证据
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Oct;39(7):965-968. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1581737. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Is colposcopy necessary at twelve months after large loop excision of the transformation zone? A clinical audit.在转化区大环状切除术十二个月后是否有必要进行阴道镜检查?一项临床审计。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Dec;53(6):571-3. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12153.
8
Follow up after LLETZ: could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence?宫颈环形电切术(LLETZ)后的随访:能否根据复发风险调整随访计划?
BJOG. 2001 Oct;108(10):1025-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00240.x.
9
Early and late pregnancy outcomes in women treated with cold-coagulation versus LLETZ cervical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; a retrospective cohort study.冷冻凝固术与大环状电切除术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的妊娠早期和晚期结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Apr;297(4):1015-1025. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4704-x. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
10
The use of cold coagulation for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.冷凝固术在宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗中的应用。
Ir Med J. 2017 May 10;110(5):565.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Liquid-Based Cytology and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing With Partial Genotyping in Cervical Screening of Women Below 30 Years Old.液基细胞学与高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测及部分基因分型在30岁以下女性宫颈筛查中的临床疗效比较
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251336414. doi: 10.1177/10732748251336414. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
2
A mixed-methods preliminary evaluation of an innovative treatment for cervical precancer in El Salvador's screen-and-treat program.对萨尔瓦多筛查与治疗项目中子宫颈癌前病变创新疗法的混合方法初步评估。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Mar 13;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03638-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of point-of-care thermal ablation among high-risk human papillomavirus positive women in China.中国高危型人乳头瘤病毒阳性女性行即时治疗性热消融术的疗效。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Mar 15;148(6):1419-1427. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33290. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
2
Human papillomavirus in cervical cancer and oropharyngeal cancer: One cause, two diseases.宫颈癌和口咽癌中的人乳头瘤病毒:同一病因,两种疾病。
Cancer. 2017 Jun 15;123(12):2219-2229. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30588. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
3
Comparison of cure rates in women treated with cold-coagulation versus LLETZ cervical treatment for CIN2-3 on pretreatment cervical punch biopsies: a retrospective cohort study.
对经宫颈穿刺活检确诊为CIN2-3的女性,采用冷凝法与宫颈环形电切术(LLETZ)治疗的治愈率比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Apr;295(4):979-986. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4306-z. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
4
Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.根据锥形切除深度对宫颈浸润前和早期浸润性疾病进行局部治疗后的不良产科结局:系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Jul 28;354:i3633. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3633.
5
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.全球癌症发病与死亡:GLOBOCAN 2012 数据源、方法与主要模式。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
6
Success rate of cold coagulation for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective analysis of a series of cases.冷凝治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的成功率:一系列病例的回顾性分析
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2015 Jan;19(1):17-21. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000031.
7
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of cold coagulation as a treatment method for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review.Meta 分析冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的疗效:系统评价。
BJOG. 2014 Jul;121(8):929-42. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12655. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
8
The human papillomavirus family and its role in carcinogenesis.人乳头瘤病毒家族及其在致癌作用中的角色。
Semin Cancer Biol. 2014 Jun;26:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
9
Cold coagulation to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.冷冻凝固法治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变。
BJOG. 2013 Mar;120(4):510. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.2012.03505.x.
10
Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer.有关人乳头瘤病毒检测在宫颈癌二级预防中的证据。
Vaccine. 2012 Nov 20;30 Suppl 5:F88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.095.