• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恶性胸腔积液中胸水细胞学检查的诊断敏感性:系统评价与Meta分析

Diagnostic sensitivity of pleural fluid cytology in malignant pleural effusions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Kassirian Shayan, Hinton Stephanie N, Cuninghame Sean, Chaudhary Rushil, Iansavitchene Alla, Amjadi Kayvan, Dhaliwal Inderdeep, Zeman-Pocrnich Cady, Mitchell Michael A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Thorax. 2023 Jan;78(1):32-40. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217959. Epub 2022 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217959
PMID:35110369
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pleural fluid cytology is an important diagnostic test used for the investigation of pleural effusions. There is considerable variability in the reported sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions (MPE) in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to determine the diagnostic sensitivity of pleural fluid cytology for MPE, both overall and by tumour type, to better inform the decision-making process when investigating pleural effusions.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of EMBASE and MEDLINE was performed by four reviewers. Articles satisfying inclusion criteria were evaluated for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool.

DATA EXTRACTION

For quantitative analysis, we performed a metaanalysis using a binary random-effects model to determine pooled sensitivity. Subgroup analysis was performed based on primary cancer site and meta-regression by year of publication.

SYNTHESIS

Thirty-six studies with 6057 patients with MPE were included in the meta-analysis. The overall diagnostic sensitivity of pleural fluid cytology for MPE was 58.2% (95% CI 52.5% to 63.9%; range 20.5%-86.0%). There was substantial heterogeneity present among studies (I 95.5%). For primary thoracic malignancies, sensitivity was highest in lung adenocarcinoma (83.6%; 95% CI 77.7% to 89.6%) and lowest in lung squamous cell carcinoma (24.2%; 95% CI 17.0% to 31.5%) and mesothelioma (28.9%; 95% CI 16.2% to 41.5%). For malignancies with extrathoracic origin, sensitivity was high for ovarian cancer (85.2%; 95% CI 74.2% to 96.1%) and modest for breast cancer (65.3%; 95% CI 49.8% to 80.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pleural fluid cytology has an overall sensitivity of 58.2% for the diagnosis of MPE. Clinicians should be aware of the high variability in diagnostic sensitivity by primary tumour type as well as the potential reasons for false-negative cytology results.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021231473.

摘要

背景

胸腔积液细胞学检查是用于胸腔积液调查的一项重要诊断测试。文献中报道的恶性胸腔积液(MPE)诊断敏感性存在很大差异。

目的

本综述的目的是确定胸腔积液细胞学检查对MPE的诊断敏感性,包括总体敏感性以及按肿瘤类型分类的敏感性,以便在调查胸腔积液时更好地为决策过程提供信息。

数据来源

四位评审员对EMBASE和MEDLINE进行了文献检索。使用QUADAS-2工具对符合纳入标准的文章进行偏倚评估。

数据提取

为进行定量分析,我们使用二元随机效应模型进行荟萃分析以确定合并敏感性。基于原发癌部位进行亚组分析,并按发表年份进行meta回归分析。

综合分析

荟萃分析纳入了36项研究,共6057例MPE患者。胸腔积液细胞学检查对MPE的总体诊断敏感性为58.2%(95%CI 52.5%至63.9%;范围20.5%-86.0%)。各研究之间存在显著异质性(I²=95.5%)。对于原发性胸部恶性肿瘤,肺腺癌的敏感性最高(83.6%;95%CI 77.7%至89.6%),肺鳞状细胞癌最低(24.2%;95%CI 17.0%至31.5%),间皮瘤为(28.9%;95%CI 16.2%至41.5%)。对于胸外起源的恶性肿瘤,卵巢癌的敏感性较高(85.2%;95%CI 74.2%至96.1%),乳腺癌中等(65.3%;95%CI 49.8%至80.8%)。

结论

胸腔积液细胞学检查对MPE的总体诊断敏感性为58.2%。临床医生应意识到诊断敏感性因原发性肿瘤类型而异的高度变异性以及细胞学检查结果假阴性的潜在原因。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42021231473

相似文献

1
Diagnostic sensitivity of pleural fluid cytology in malignant pleural effusions: systematic review and meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液中胸水细胞学检查的诊断敏感性:系统评价与Meta分析
Thorax. 2023 Jan;78(1):32-40. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217959. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
Diagnostic yield of pleural fluid cytology in malignant effusions: an Australian tertiary centre experience.恶性胸腔积液中胸腔积液细胞学检查的诊断率:澳大利亚一家三级中心的经验
Intern Med J. 2018 Nov;48(11):1318-1324. doi: 10.1111/imj.13991.
3
Evaluation of pleural fluid cytology for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion: a retrospective cohort study.胸腔积液细胞学检查对恶性胸腔积液的诊断价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
Intern Med J. 2022 Jul;52(7):1154-1159. doi: 10.1111/imj.15725. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
4
Pleural fluid cell-free DNA integrity index to identify cytologically negative malignant pleural effusions including mesotheliomas.胸腔积液无细胞游离 DNA 完整性指数鉴别包括间皮瘤在内的细胞学阴性恶性胸腔积液。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Sep 25;12:428. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-428.
5
Investigating unilateral pleural effusions: the role of cytology.探讨单侧胸腔积液:细胞学的作用。
Eur Respir J. 2018 Nov 8;52(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01254-2018. Print 2018 Nov.
6
Developing a Prediction Score for the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Effusion: MPE Score.开发一种用于恶性胸腔积液诊断的预测评分:MPE 评分。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Jan 1;23(1):25-31. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.1.25.
7
Pleural fluid microbiota as a biomarker for malignancy and prognosis.胸腔积液微生物组作为恶性肿瘤和预后的生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 8;13(1):2229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29001-4.
8
Idiopathic Pleural Effusions: Characteristics and Discrimination From Cytology-Negative Malignant Pleural Effusions.特发性胸腔积液:特征与细胞学阴性恶性胸腔积液的鉴别。
Am J Med Sci. 2020 Sep;360(3):236-242. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.04.020. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
9
Baseline predictors of negative and incomplete pleural cytology in patients with suspected pleural malignancy - Data supporting 'Direct to LAT' in selected groups.疑似胸膜恶性肿瘤患者胸膜细胞学检查阴性和不完整的基线预测因素-支持在选定人群中“直接进行 LAT”的数据。
Lung Cancer. 2019 Jul;133:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 16.
10
Diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen in malignant pleural effusion: a meta-analysis.癌胚抗原在恶性胸腔积液中的诊断价值:一项Meta分析
Respirology. 2008 Jun;13(4):518-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2008.01291.x. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovative Biomarkers for Diagnosing Malignant Ascites in Liver Cancer.用于诊断肝癌恶性腹水的创新生物标志物。
Onco Targets Ther. 2025 Aug 11;18:865-872. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S527224. eCollection 2025.
2
Medical Thoracoscopy in Malignant Pleural Effusion.恶性胸腔积液的内科胸腔镜检查
Cureus. 2025 Jun 10;17(6):e85707. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85707. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
The combination of cytospin Diff-Quik and conventional cytological examination increases the diagnostic yield for malignant pleural effusion.细胞离心涂片Diff-Quik染色法与传统细胞学检查相结合可提高恶性胸腔积液的诊断率。
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Jun 2;11(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00856-2024. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Bringing AI to Clinicians: Simplifying Pleural Effusion Cytology Diagnosis with User-Friendly Models.将人工智能带给临床医生:使用用户友好型模型简化胸腔积液细胞学诊断
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 14;15(10):1240. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15101240.
5
Influence of age and sex on the diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen for malignant pleural effusion: a analysis.年龄和性别对恶性胸腔积液患者胸水癌胚抗原诊断准确性的影响:一项分析。
Front Oncol. 2025 May 6;15:1549621. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1549621. eCollection 2025.
6
Exosomal miR-182-5p is a potential diagnostic marker for malignant pleural effusion.外泌体miR-182-5p是恶性胸腔积液的一种潜在诊断标志物。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Apr 30;14(4):1138-1148. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2024-1205. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
7
Evaluation of cytomorphological examination in the diagnosis of pleural effusion.细胞形态学检查在胸腔积液诊断中的评估
Clin Exp Med. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):112. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01642-x.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid carbohydrate antigen 72-4 for malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胸腔积液中糖类抗原72-4对恶性胸腔积液的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Feb 28;14(2):1237-1245. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-1664. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
9
Influences of age and sex on the diagnostic accuracy of human epididymis secretory protein 4 for malignant pleural effusion.年龄和性别对人附睾分泌蛋白4诊断恶性胸腔积液准确性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):3217. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86929-5.
10
Understanding the Growing Burden of Malignant Pleural Effusion - Epidemiology, Healthcare Utilization, and Cost: A Canadian Perspective.了解恶性胸腔积液日益加重的负担——流行病学、医疗保健利用及成本:加拿大视角
Respiration. 2025;104(6):421-433. doi: 10.1159/000543522. Epub 2025 Jan 21.