• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赋能型领导与员工对混合办公有效性看法之间的联系。

The link between empowering leadership and employees' perceptions of the effectiveness of blended working.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Psychol. 2022 Jun;63(3):208-218. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12796. Epub 2022 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1111/sjop.12796
PMID:35112352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9303621/
Abstract

Linked to technological and societal developments, including the COVID-19 pandemic, employees are increasingly being given the opportunity to blend onsite and remote working including flexibility as to when and where they work. Despite the proliferation of such blended working, there is little empirical research on how leaders in organizations can contribute to facilitating its effectiveness. In the present study, we hypothesized that an empowering leadership style would be positively associated with employees' perceptions of the effectiveness of blended working. Additionally, grounded in Self-Determination Theory, we hypothesized that the satisfaction of employees' work-related psychological needs for autonomy and for competence would mediate this relation. Results of a field study (N = 405 employees) using a two-wave panel design supported a cross-lagged effect of empowering leadership on employees' perceptions of the effectiveness of blended working. However, no evidence was found for the hypothesized mediated relations. Our findings could be of value to organizations as they indicate a specific leadership style that is likely to facilitate the effectiveness of blended working.

摘要

与技术和社会发展相关联,包括 COVID-19 大流行在内,员工越来越多地有机会混合现场和远程工作,包括工作时间和地点的灵活性。尽管这种混合工作方式越来越普及,但关于组织中的领导者如何促进其有效性的实证研究却很少。在本研究中,我们假设赋权型领导风格与员工对混合工作有效性的看法呈正相关。此外,基于自我决定理论,我们假设员工工作相关的心理需求(自主性和胜任感)的满足感会在这种关系中起中介作用。使用两波面板设计的现场研究(N=405 名员工)的结果支持赋权型领导对员工对混合工作有效性看法的跨期影响。然而,没有发现假设的中介关系的证据。我们的研究结果对组织可能具有价值,因为它们表明了一种可能促进混合工作有效性的特定领导风格。

相似文献

1
The link between empowering leadership and employees' perceptions of the effectiveness of blended working.赋能型领导与员工对混合办公有效性看法之间的联系。
Scand J Psychol. 2022 Jun;63(3):208-218. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12796. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
Effect of empowering leadership on employees' workplace loneliness: a moderated mediation model.赋能型领导对员工工作场所孤独感的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 17;15:1387624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387624. eCollection 2024.
3
Leading Innovative Work-Behavior in Times of COVID-19: Relationship Between Leadership Style, Innovative Work-Behavior, Work-Related Flow, and IT-Enabled Presence Awareness During the First and Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的引领创新工作行为:新冠疫情第一波和第二波期间领导风格、创新工作行为、工作相关的心流体验以及信息技术支持的在场意识之间的关系
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 28;12:717345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717345. eCollection 2021.
4
Can empowering leadership promote employees' pro-environmental behavior? Empirical analysis based on psychological distance.赋能型领导能否促进员工的环保行为?基于心理距离的实证分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 9;13:774561. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.774561. eCollection 2022.
5
Leadership empowering behaviour as a predictor of employees' psychological well-being: Evidence from a cross-sectional study among secondary school teachers in Kohat Division, Pakistan.领导授权行为对员工心理健康的预测作用:来自巴基斯坦科哈特地区中学教师横断面研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254576. eCollection 2021.
6
How Can Servant Leadership Promote Employees' Voice Behavior? A Moderated Chain Mediation Model.仆人式领导如何促进员工的建言行为?一个有调节的链式中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 4;13:938983. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938983. eCollection 2022.
7
The long reach of the leader: Can empowering leadership at work result in enriched home lives?领导者的深远影响:职场中的赋权型领导能否让家庭生活更加充实?
J Occup Health Psychol. 2020 Jun;25(3):203-213. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000177. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
8
The Impact of Empowering Leadership on Taking Charge Behaviors: Mediating Strengths Use and Moderating Ambition.赋能型领导对主动负责行为的影响:优势利用的中介作用与抱负的调节作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;14(8):633. doi: 10.3390/bs14080633.
9
"Thank You for Your Good Work": the Impact of Received Gratitude on Employees' Work Motivation.“感谢你的出色工作”:所获感激对员工工作积极性的影响
J Psychol. 2024;158(2):161-178. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2023.2271637. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
10
Does meaningful work mediate the relationship between empowering leadership and mental health? Evidence from Malaysian SME employees.有意义的工作是否能调节赋能型领导与心理健康之间的关系?来自马来西亚中小企业员工的证据。
Front Sociol. 2023 Jul 14;8:1138536. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1138536. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Workplace impact on employees: A Lifelines Corona Research Initiative on the return to work.工作场所对员工的影响:生命线新冠病毒研究倡议的复工研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 5;18(1):e0279902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279902. eCollection 2023.
2
The Impact of Empowering Leadership on Job Performance of Higher Education Institutions Employees: Mediating Role of Goal Clarity and Self-Efficacy.赋能型领导对高等教育机构员工工作绩效的影响:目标清晰度和自我效能感的中介作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Mar 17;15:677-694. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S357083. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Are the benefits of autonomy satisfaction and the costs of autonomy frustration dependent on individuals' autonomy strength?自主性满足的好处和自主性受挫的代价是否取决于个体的自主性强度?
J Pers. 2018 Dec;86(6):1017-1036. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12372. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
2
Need satisfaction at work, job strain, and performance: A diary study.工作中的需求满足、工作压力与绩效:一项日记研究。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2018 Jul;23(3):361-372. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000098. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
3
Using Parcels to Convert Path Analysis Models Into Latent Variable Models.
使用数据包将路径分析模型转换为潜在变量模型。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2005 Apr 1;40(2):235-59. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_4.
4
Blended working: for whom it may (not) work.混合工作模式:对谁可能(不)适用。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 17;9(7):e102921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102921. eCollection 2014.
5
Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one.为何项目与包裹之争并非不可调和。
Psychol Methods. 2013 Sep;18(3):285-300. doi: 10.1037/a0033266. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
6
Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic.确保尺度差异卡方检验统计量的正值性。
Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.
7
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
8
Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance.测量不变性检验中替代拟合指数的功效与敏感性。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 May;93(3):568-92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568.
9
Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation.纵向中介效应横断面分析中的偏倚。
Psychol Methods. 2007 Mar;12(1):23-44. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23.
10
Measuring empowerment in working life: a review.衡量工作生活中的赋权:一项综述。
Work. 2006;26(1):37-46.