Dellon A L
J Reconstr Microsurg. 1986 Jan;2(2):123-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1007013.
A review of replanted digits has indicated that excellent sensory function can be recovered in replants that are distal, in which the mechanism of injury has been a sharp cut, in which the patient's age is young, and in cases where the patient receives postoperative sensory re-education. It appears that poor sensory recovery in replanted digits is most directly attributable to crush or avulsion type injuries and lack of sensory re-education in the postoperative period. The level of sensory recovery in toe-to-thumb transfers appears to be better than in the donor toe and better than in replanted digits. The explanation for this most likely lies in the sharp "mechanism of injury" in the toe-to-thumb transfer and in the "extra" postoperative rehabilitation such cases receive. Future improvements in recovery of sensation in replanted digits may come from increased use of nerve grafting in those digits that have been crushed or avulsed, and by instituting routine sensory re-education in the postoperative period.
对再植手指的回顾表明,在远端再植、损伤机制为锐器切割、患者年龄较轻且患者接受术后感觉再训练的情况下,可恢复出色的感觉功能。似乎再植手指感觉恢复不佳最直接的原因是挤压或撕脱伤类型以及术后缺乏感觉再训练。拇指再造中感觉恢复水平似乎优于供趾,也优于再植手指。对此的解释很可能在于拇指再造时锐利的“损伤机制”以及此类病例所接受的“额外”术后康复。未来再植手指感觉恢复方面的改善可能来自于在那些遭受挤压或撕脱的手指中增加神经移植的使用,以及在术后开展常规感觉再训练。