George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e2989-e2999. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13744. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
People with serious mental illness (SMI; e.g. schizophrenia) have mortality rates two to three times higher than the general population, largely due to a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Healthy lifestyle interventions can improve the health of people with SMI, but information about why these interventions work for some and not others is scarce. Our study aims to qualitatively explore differences in these two groups' overall experiences and application of the intervention. Data were drawn from a randomised effectiveness trial of a peer-led healthy lifestyle intervention. Qualitative data from interviews and focus groups with 21 participants were linked to their 12-month outcome data. Grounded theory was used to compare the experiences of participants who achieved clinically significant CVD risk reduction (i.e. clinically significant weight loss or clinically significant improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness) versus those who did not. Three qualitative themes: learning, change, sticking with it - differentiated participants who achieved CVD risk reduction and those that did not. Participants achieving CVD risk reduction described learning and applying specific knowledge and skills related to a healthy lifestyle when making health decisions, made healthy concrete changes to diet and physical activity, and stuck with those changes. Participants not achieving clinically significant CVD risk reduction reported surface-level learning about healthy lifestyle practices, difficulty sticking with healthy changes, and were more likely to report ambiguous or no changes. Our findings suggest that healthy lifestyle interventions for people with SMI should provide experiential in-vivo learning experiences while periodically assessing participants' understanding and then tailoring the intervention to their needs. It is important to build self-efficacy for health behaviour changes by creating early perceptions of success, which was found to enhance motivation and sustain behaviour change. Helping people with SMI develop and strengthen their support systems will also be an important factor for building and sustaining health behaviour changes.
患有严重精神疾病(SMI;例如精神分裂症)的人的死亡率比一般人群高 2 到 3 倍,主要是由于心血管疾病(CVD)的患病率较高。健康生活方式干预可以改善 SMI 患者的健康状况,但关于为什么这些干预措施对某些人有效而对其他人无效的信息却很少。我们的研究旨在定性探讨这两组人总体经验和干预措施应用的差异。数据来自一项针对同伴主导的健康生活方式干预的随机有效性试验。对 21 名参与者的访谈和焦点小组的定性数据与他们 12 个月的结果数据相关联。使用扎根理论比较了在心血管疾病风险降低方面取得临床显著效果(即临床显著体重减轻或心肺健康有临床显著改善)的参与者和未取得临床显著效果的参与者的经验。三个定性主题:学习、改变、坚持——区分了那些实现 CVD 风险降低和未实现 CVD 风险降低的参与者。实现 CVD 风险降低的参与者描述了在做出健康决策时学习和应用与健康生活方式相关的具体知识和技能,在饮食和身体活动方面做出了健康的具体改变,并坚持了这些改变。没有达到临床显著 CVD 风险降低的参与者报告了对健康生活方式实践的表面学习,难以坚持健康的改变,并且更有可能报告模糊或没有改变。我们的研究结果表明,针对 SMI 患者的健康生活方式干预措施应提供与健康生活方式相关的体验式现场学习经验,同时定期评估参与者的理解程度,然后根据他们的需求调整干预措施。通过创造早期成功的认知,建立健康行为改变的自我效能感,从而增强动力并维持行为改变,这一点非常重要。帮助 SMI 患者发展和加强他们的支持系统,也是建立和维持健康行为改变的一个重要因素。