Lafta Aya, Ukrainetz Judy, Davison Sara, Thompson Stephanie, Bello Aminu, Braam Branko
Division of Nephrology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Alberta Health Services, Alberta Kidney Care-North, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 3;17(2):e0262519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262519. eCollection 2022.
Whether fluid overload is associated with vascular stiffness parameters in hemodialysis (HD) patients has not been fully elucidated. We hypothesized that interdialytic fluid accumulation increases vascular stiffness parameters, which improves with intradialytic ultrafiltration.
Fluid overload and vascular stiffness parameters were assessed in 39 HD patients (20 with and 19 without fluid overload) and compared to 26 healthy controls. Fluid status was assessed 15 minutes before the mid-week HD session by bio-impedance spectroscopy. Following this, ambulatory pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx) were measured for 24 hours before another mid-week HD session and then for 5 hours starting 30 minutes before and ending 30 minutes after the session.
HD patients had significant fluid overload compared to healthy controls (2.0±2.4 vs. -0.2±0.6 L; P<0.001) and baseline PWV was higher (10.3±1.7 vs. 8.8±1.4 m/s; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between PWV and AIx in fluid overloaded and non-fluid overloaded HD patients prior to, or during the HD session. AIx of non-fluid overloaded HD patients improved after the HD session (P = 0.04). Average 24-hour AIx was higher in fluid overloaded HD patients (P<0.001).
Inter- and intradialytic changes in fluid volume were only weakly related to vascular stiffness parameters in HD patients. Although there was a modest reduction in AIx in non-fluid overloaded HD patients after the dialysis session, fluid removal did not improve vascular stiffness parameters during the HD session. We speculate that the effect of fluid overload correction on vascular stiffness parameters requires long-term adjustments in the vasculature.
血液透析(HD)患者的液体超负荷是否与血管僵硬度参数相关尚未完全阐明。我们推测透析间期的液体潴留会增加血管僵硬度参数,而透析期的超滤可使其改善。
对39例HD患者(20例有液体超负荷,19例无液体超负荷)和26例健康对照者进行液体超负荷和血管僵硬度参数评估并比较。在周中HD治疗前15分钟通过生物电阻抗光谱法评估液体状态。此后,在另一次周中HD治疗前24小时测量动态脉搏波速度(PWV)和增强指数(AIx),然后在治疗前30分钟至治疗后30分钟开始的5小时内进行测量。
与健康对照者相比,HD患者存在明显的液体超负荷(2.0±2.4 vs. -0.2±0.6 L;P<0.001),且基线PWV更高(10.3±1.7 vs. 8.8±1.4 m/s;P<0.001)。在HD治疗前或治疗期间,液体超负荷和非液体超负荷的HD患者的PWV和AIx之间无显著差异。非液体超负荷的HD患者在HD治疗后AIx有所改善(P = 0.04)。液体超负荷的HD患者的平均24小时AIx更高(P<0.001)。
HD患者透析间期和透析期的液体量变化与血管僵硬度参数仅存在微弱关联。尽管非液体超负荷的HD患者在透析治疗后AIx有适度降低,但透析期间的液体清除并未改善血管僵硬度参数。我们推测,纠正液体超负荷对血管僵硬度参数的影响需要对脉管系统进行长期调整。