Vedantam Shyam, Amin Sunil, Maher Ben, Ahmad Saqib, Kadir Shanil, Niaz Saad Khalid, Wright Mark, Tehami Nadeem
Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Clin Endosc. 2022 May;55(3):426-433. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.239. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cholangiogram interpretation is not used as a key performance indicator (KPI) of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) training, and national societies recommend different minimum numbers per annum to maintain competence. This study aimed to determine the relationship between correct ERCP cholangiogram interpretation and experience.
One hundred fifty ERCPists were surveyed to appropriately interpret ERCP cholangiographic findings. There were three groups of 50 participants each: "Trainees," "Consultants group 1" (performed >75 ERCPs per year), and "Consultants group 2" (performed >100 ERCPs per year).
Trainees was inferior to Consultants groups 1 and 2 in identifying all findings except choledocholithiasis outside the intrahepatic duct on the initial or completion/occlusion cholangiogram. Consultants group 1 was inferior to Consultants group 2 in identifying Strasberg type A bile leaks (odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.96), Strasberg type B (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95), and Bismuth type 2 hilar strictures (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95).
This investigation supports the notion that cholangiogram interpretation improves with increased annual ERCP case volumes. Thus, a higher annual volume of procedures performed may improve the ability to correctly interpret particularly difficult findings. Cholangiogram interpretation, in addition to bile duct cannulation, could be considered as another KPI of ERCP training.
背景/目的:胆管造影解读不作为内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)培训的关键绩效指标(KPI),并且各国家学会推荐了不同的每年最低数量以维持能力。本研究旨在确定正确的ERCP胆管造影解读与经验之间的关系。
对150名ERCP术者进行调查,以恰当解读ERCP胆管造影结果。共有三组,每组50名参与者:“ trainees”、“顾问组1”(每年进行>75例ERCP)和“顾问组2”(每年进行>100例ERCP)。
在初次或完成/阻塞胆管造影上识别除肝内胆管外的胆总管结石以外的所有结果方面, trainees组不如顾问组1和2。顾问组1在识别Strasberg A型胆漏(优势比[OR],0.86;95%置信区间[CI],0.77-0.96)、Strasberg B型(OR,0.84;95%CI,0.74-0.95)和Bismuth 2型肝门狭窄(OR,0.81;95%CI,0.69-0.95)方面不如顾问组2。
本研究支持随着每年ERCP病例量增加胆管造影解读能力提高这一观点。因此,每年进行的手术量增加可能会提高正确解读特别困难结果的能力。除胆管插管外,胆管造影解读可被视为ERCP培训的另一项KPI。