Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 3;12(2):e053108. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053108.
Current evidence on vascular access strategies for haemodialysis patients is based on observational studies that are at high risk of selection bias. For elderly patients, autologous arteriovenous fistulas that are typically created in usual care may not be the best option because a significant proportion of fistulas either fail to mature or remain unused. In addition, long-term complications associated with arteriovenous grafts and central venous catheters may be less relevant when considering the limited life expectancy of these patients. Therefore, we designed the Optimising Access Surgery in Senior Haemodialysis Patients (OASIS) trial to determine the best strategy for vascular access creation in elderly haemodialysis patients.
OASIS is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with an equal participant allocation in three treatment arms. Patients aged 70 years or older who are expected to initiate haemodialysis treatment in the next 6 months or who have started haemodialysis urgently with a catheter will be enrolled. To detect and exclude patients with an unusually long life expectancy, we will use a previously published mortality prediction model after external validation. Participants allocated to the usual care arm will be treated according to current guidelines on vascular access creation and will undergo fistula creation. Participants allocated to one of the two intervention arms will undergo graft placement or catheter insertion. The primary outcome is the number of access-related interventions required for each patient-year of haemodialysis treatment. We will enrol 195 patients to have sufficient statistical power to detect an absolute decrease of 0.80 interventions per year.
Because of clinical equipoise, we believe it is justified to randomly allocate elderly patients to the different vascular access strategies. The study was approved by an accredited medical ethics review committee. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and will be implemented in clinical practice guidelines.
NL7933.
V.5, 25 February 2021.
目前关于血液透析患者血管通路策略的证据基于观察性研究,这些研究存在选择偏倚的高风险。对于老年患者,通常在常规护理中创建的自体动静脉瘘可能不是最佳选择,因为很大一部分瘘管要么无法成熟,要么未被使用。此外,由于这些患者的预期寿命有限,与动静脉移植物和中心静脉导管相关的长期并发症可能不太相关。因此,我们设计了优化老年血液透析患者血管通路手术(OASIS)试验,以确定老年血液透析患者血管通路创建的最佳策略。
OASIS 是一项多中心随机对照试验,三个治疗组的参与者分配比例相等。预计在接下来的 6 个月内开始血液透析治疗或因紧急需要而使用导管开始血液透析的 70 岁或以上的患者将被纳入研究。为了检测和排除预期寿命异常长的患者,我们将使用外部验证后以前发表的死亡率预测模型。分配到常规护理组的患者将根据血管通路创建的现行指南进行治疗,并进行瘘管创建。分配到两个干预组之一的患者将接受移植物放置或导管插入。主要结局是每位接受血液透析治疗的患者每年所需的与通路相关的干预次数。我们将招募 195 名患者,以获得足够的统计效力,以检测每年绝对减少 0.80 次干预。
由于临床平衡,我们认为随机分配老年患者到不同的血管通路策略是合理的。该研究已获得认可的医学伦理审查委员会的批准。研究结果将通过同行评议的出版物传播,并将纳入临床实践指南。
NL7933。
V.5,2021 年 2 月 25 日。