Smith-MacDonald Lorraine, Lusk Jaimie, Lee-Baggley Dayna, Bright Katherine, Laidlaw Alexa, Voth Melissa, Spencer Shaylee, Cruikshank Emily, Pike Ashley, Jones Chelsea, Bremault-Phillips Suzette
Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Department of Veterans Affairs, Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 14;12:801680. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.801680. eCollection 2021.
In the context of the global pandemic of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19), healthcare providers (HCPs) have experienced difficult moral and ethical dilemmas. Research is highlighting the importance of moral injury (MI)-a trauma syndrome related to transgressing personal morals and values-in understanding the psychological harm and occupational impairment experienced by HCPs. To date, MI treatments have largely been developed for military personnel and veterans and rely on in-person one-on-one psychotherapy.
This project aims to explore the feasibility and acceptability of an evidence-informed online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based group therapy for MI in HCPs called "Accepting Moral Pain and Suffering for Healthcare Providers" (AMPS-HCP).
This feasibility and acceptability study included three separate phases with the first two phases focused on the development of the psychotherapeutic intervention and the third phase focused on the evaluation of the psychotherapeutic intervention. Eight participants (including registered nurses, practical nurses and respiratory therapists) completed seven 90-min sessions in an online group format. The focus of these sessions included ACT and MI psychoeducation and experientials. Qualitative semi-structured interview data was thematically analyzed while demographic and quantitative self-reported outcome data underwent descriptive analysis and non-parametric testing.
Results show that the intervention was highly feasible and acceptable to healthcare providers who worked on the frontline during COVID-19. Feasibility (referrals, eligibility, retention, participation engagement) was strong (8 out of 10 participants; 80% vs. desired >70% eligibility) and overall, 80% of participants completed 71% of the intervention. Data further supported the applicability and acceptability of the intervention. Preliminary data suggests that AMPS-HCP may supports HCPs to address MI.
This study is the first to report on the development and evaluation of an online MI group intervention for registered nurses, registered practical nurses, and respiratory therapists working during COVID-19. Results showed the use of both the online and group components of the intervention were acceptable and feasible during the third wave of COVID-19.
在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引发的全球大流行(COVID-19)背景下,医疗保健提供者(HCPs)面临着艰难的道德和伦理困境。研究凸显了道德伤害(MI)的重要性——一种与违背个人道德和价值观相关的创伤综合征——对于理解HCPs所经历的心理伤害和职业损伤。迄今为止,MI治疗主要是为军事人员和退伍军人开发的,并且依赖面对面的一对一心理治疗。
本项目旨在探索一种基于循证的、针对HCPs中MI的在线接纳与承诺疗法团体治疗(名为“医护人员接纳道德痛苦与苦难”(AMPS-HCP))的可行性和可接受性。
这项可行性和可接受性研究包括三个独立阶段,前两个阶段专注于心理治疗干预的开发,第三阶段专注于心理治疗干预的评估。八名参与者(包括注册护士、执业护士和呼吸治疗师)以在线团体形式完成了七次90分钟的课程。这些课程的重点包括接纳与承诺疗法和MI心理教育及体验活动。对定性半结构化访谈数据进行了主题分析,而人口统计学和定量自我报告结果数据则进行了描述性分析和非参数检验。
结果表明,该干预措施对于在COVID-19期间一线工作的医疗保健提供者而言具有高度可行性和可接受性。可行性(转诊、资格、留存率、参与度)很强(10名参与者中有8名;80%,而期望的资格率>70%),总体而言,80%的参与者完成了71%的干预。数据进一步支持了该干预措施的适用性和可接受性。初步数据表明,AMPS-HCP可能有助于HCPs应对MI。
本研究首次报告了针对在COVID-19期间工作的注册护士、注册执业护士和呼吸治疗师的在线MI团体干预的开发和评估。结果表明,在COVID-19第三波疫情期间,干预措施的在线和团体部分的使用都是可接受且可行的。