Lei Meiqing, Li Xiaoli, Zhang Yanming, Qu Qi, Jiao Wenjing, Zhou Huifen, Wang Qingyuan, Qiu Huiying, Tang Xiaowen, Han Yue, Fu Chengcheng, Jin Zhengming, Chen Suning, Sun Aining, Miao Miao, Liu Limin, Wu Depei
National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplantation of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Department of Hematology, Haikou Municipal People's Hospital, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 18;11:714033. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.714033. eCollection 2021.
We retrospectively compared the outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients who received haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a single unrelated cord blood unit (Haplo-cord HSCT) (n = 180) or matched related donor (MRD)-HSCT (n = 128). After propensity score matching, we were able to match 88 patients in each group and to compare the outcomes between the two matched-pair groups. Haplo-cord recipients exhibited a longer median days for neutrophil engraftment (12 11, = 0.001) and for platelet engraftment (15 13, = 0.003). Haplo-cord recipients a high cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (29.8 14.0%, = 0.006), while similar III-IV acute GVHD, total chronic GVHD, and moderate to severe chronic GVHD at four-year (all < 0.05). Among the Haplo-cord HSCT and MRD-HSCT groups, the four-year GVHD-free/failure-free survival rates were 73.5% and 66.9% ( = 0.388) respectively, and the overall survival rates were 81.5% and 77.2% ( = 0.484), respectively. Similar comparable results also were observed between the corresponding first-line, older or younger than 40 years old subgroups. The Haplo-cord HSCT group exhibited higher scores in the physical component summary, physical functioning, general health and social functioning than the MRD-HSCT group (all < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, young age and Haplo-cord HSCT were favorable factors for HRQoL, while moderate to severe cGVHD was associated with lower HRQoL. These results suggest that for SAA patients, Haplo-cord HSCT could achieve at least comparable efficacy and HRQoL to MRD-HSCT.
我们回顾性比较了接受单倍体相合造血干细胞移植联合单个无关脐血单位(单倍体-脐血造血干细胞移植,n = 180)或匹配的相关供者造血干细胞移植(MRD-HSCT,n = 128)的重型再生障碍性贫血(SAA)患者的结局和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。经过倾向评分匹配后,我们能够在每组中匹配88例患者,并比较两个匹配对组之间的结局。单倍体-脐血受者的中性粒细胞植入中位天数(12对11,P = 0.001)和血小板植入中位天数(15对13,P = 0.003)更长。单倍体-脐血受者发生II-IV级急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的累积发生率较高(29.8对14.0%,P = 0.006),而四年时III-IV级急性GVHD、慢性GVHD总数以及中度至重度慢性GVHD相似(均P < 0.05)。在单倍体-脐血造血干细胞移植组和MRD-HSCT组中,四年无GVHD/无失败生存率分别为73.5%和66.9%(P = 0.388),总生存率分别为81.5%和77.2%(P = 0.484)。在相应的一线、年龄大于或小于40岁的亚组之间也观察到了类似的可比结果。单倍体-脐血造血干细胞移植组在身体成分总结、身体功能、总体健康和社会功能方面的得分高于MRD-HSCT组(均P < 0.05)。在多变量分析中,年轻和单倍体-脐血造血干细胞移植是HRQoL的有利因素,而中度至重度慢性GVHD与较低的HRQoL相关。这些结果表明,对于SAA患者,单倍体-脐血造血干细胞移植可实现至少与MRD-HSCT相当的疗效和HRQoL。