Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins Center for Mental Health and Addiction Policy, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146971. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46971.
Stigma toward people with opioid use disorder (OUD) is pervasive in clinical settings, impeding delivery of high-quality care. To date, no study has evaluated the effect of different stigma-reduction messages or messengers among health care professionals.
To evaluate the effect of OUD-related messages delivered by different messengers on stigma and attitudes toward people with OUD among health care professionals.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial examined the effects of OUD-related messages delivered by a visual campaign alone or in combination with a written narrative vignette from the perspective of 1 of 3 messengers. Health care professionals in the US were recruited from 2 national online survey panels (Ipsos KnowledgePanel and SurveyHealthcareGlobus). A total of 1842 participants completed a web-based survey measuring stigma toward people with OUD from November 13 to 30, 2020.
Eight groups were exposed to 1 of 2 message frames. One frame (Words Matter) emphasized the harm of stigmatizing language, and the other (Medication Treatment Works) focused on the effectiveness of medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of OUD. Message frames were communicated through either a visual campaign alone or a visual campaign in combination with a written narrative vignette from the perspective of a simulated patient with OUD, a clinician, or a health care system administrator.
Dimensions of stigma toward people with OUD were measured on 5-point Likert scales that included items about desire for social distance from people with OUD, perception of individual blame for OUD, perspective of OUD as a medical condition, and support for increased governmental spending on OUD treatment. The level of warmth felt toward people with OUD was measured by a feeling thermometer (range, 0-100 points).
Among 1842 participants, the mean (SD) age was 47 (13) years; 1324 participants (71.9%) were female, 145 (7.9%) were Hispanic, 140 (7.6%) were non-Hispanic Black, 1344 (73.0%) were non-Hispanic White, and 213 (11.6%) were of other non-Hispanic race (ie, individuals who did not self-report race as Black or White and did not self-report ethnicity as Hispanic). Compared with nonexposure, exposure to the combination of visual campaign and narrative vignette communicating the importance of nonstigmatizing language from the perspective of a patient with OUD was associated with a lower probability (difference, -16.8 percentage points, 95% CI, -26.1 to -7.4; P < .001) of unwillingness to have a person with OUD marry into the family (a measure of social distance preference) and a 7.2-point (95% CI, 3.2-11.1; P < .001) higher warmth rating. Participants exposed to the combined visual campaign and patient vignette about the value of medication treatment for OUD also had significantly lower levels of stigma compared with those in the nonexposed control group (eg, unwillingness to have a person with OUD as a neighbor: difference, -15.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -24.6 to -6.0; P = .001).
In this study, messages about nonstigmatizing language and effective medication for OUD reduced stigma among health care professionals. Stigma-reduction efforts targeting health care professionals may improve health care system capacity to serve people with OUD.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05127707.
重要性:在临床环境中,人们普遍对阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者存在污名化现象,这阻碍了高质量护理的提供。迄今为止,尚无研究评估在卫生保健专业人员中使用不同的减少污名化信息或信息传递者对 OUD 相关污名和态度的影响。
目的:评估由不同信息传递者传递的 OUD 相关信息对卫生保健专业人员的 OUD 相关污名和态度的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:这项随机临床试验从 3 个信息传递者中的 1 个角度评估了仅通过视觉运动或结合来自 OUD 患者的书面叙述小插曲的 OUD 相关信息对 OUD 相关污名的影响。美国的卫生保健专业人员是从两个全国在线调查小组(益普索知识面板和 SurveyHealthcareGlobus)招募的。共有 1842 名参与者于 2020 年 11 月 13 日至 30 日完成了一项基于网络的调查,调查内容是他们对 OUD 患者的污名态度。
干预措施:8 个组暴露于 2 个信息框架中的 1 个。一个框架(“言语很重要”)强调了污名化语言的危害,另一个框架(“药物治疗有效”)则侧重于美国食品和药物管理局批准的治疗 OUD 的药物的有效性。信息框架通过视觉运动或结合来自 OUD 患者、临床医生或卫生保健系统管理员的模拟患者的书面叙述小插曲来传达。
主要结果和测量:使用包含与 OUD 患者保持社会距离的愿望、对 OUD 的个人归咎感、将 OUD 视为医学状况的观点以及对增加 OUD 治疗政府支出的支持等方面的 5 点李克特量表来衡量对 OUD 患者的污名程度。对 OUD 患者的温暖感受是通过感觉温度计(范围为 0-100 分)来衡量的。
结果:在 1842 名参与者中,平均(SD)年龄为 47(13)岁;1324 名参与者(71.9%)为女性,145 名(7.9%)为西班牙裔,140 名(7.6%)为非西班牙裔黑人,1344 名(73.0%)为非西班牙裔白人,213 名(11.6%)为其他非西班牙裔种族(即,不自我报告为黑人或白人种族,也不自我报告为西班牙裔的个体)。与无暴露相比,暴露于视觉运动与叙事小插曲相结合,从 OUD 患者的角度传达非污名化语言的重要性,与不愿意让 OUD 患者与家人结婚(一种社会距离偏好的衡量标准)的可能性较低相关(差异,-16.8 个百分点,95%CI,-26.1 至-7.4;P<.001),且温暖评分高 7.2 分(95%CI,3.2-11.1;P<.001)。与未暴露于对照组相比,暴露于关于 OUD 药物治疗价值的视觉运动和患者小插曲的参与者的污名程度也显著降低(例如,不愿意让 OUD 患者作为邻居:差异,-15.3 个百分点;95%CI,-24.6 至-6.0;P=.001)。
结论和相关性:在这项研究中,关于非污名化语言和 OUD 有效药物的信息减少了卫生保健专业人员的污名。针对卫生保健专业人员的减少污名化努力可能会提高卫生保健系统服务 OUD 患者的能力。
试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT05127707。