Suppr超能文献

评价每周一次司美格鲁肽治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的患者报告满意度和临床疗效:一项前瞻性研究。

Evaluation of Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Clinical Efficacy of Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Ambispective Study.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Diabetes Treatment Center, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, P.O. Box 7897, Riyadh, 11159, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2022 Apr;39(4):1582-1595. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02053-0. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The method of therapy administration and injection device characteristics have been documented to influence perceptions and preference of treatment among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We aimed to assess the metabolic effectiveness and patient-reported satisfaction of once-weekly semaglutide compared to liraglutide in suboptimally controlled patients with T2D.

METHODS

We conducted this single-center cohort study at diabetes center clinics at a tertiary care hospital between February 2021 and August 2021. We included suboptimally controlled patients with T2D who had been treated with liraglutide for at least 3 months at baseline, then shifted to once-weekly semaglutide and followed up for the same period. Ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) metrics [i.e., mean glucose level, glycemic variability (GV), time above range (TAR), and time in range (TIR)] for baseline and follow-up were compared. To assess the satisfaction with shifting, we used the valid Arabic version of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status (DTSQs) and change (DTSQc) while the injection device preference was assessed using the Diabetes Injection Device Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ).

RESULTS

We included 52 patients (25 male and 27 female), with a mean age of 48 (± 6) years and a mean diabetes mellitus duration of 7.27 (± 3.79) years. We observed a significantly decreased mean HbA1c level following semaglutide treatment (7.79% at study end vs. 8.07% at baseline, p < 0.001) and body weight (84.64 ± 7.68 vs. 87.15 ± 8.011, p < 0.001). Compared to the glucometrics data at baseline, we observed a significantly improved mean average glucose, GV, TAR, and TIR (p < 0.001). Data from the DTSQs and DTSQc questionnaires showed a high level of patient-reported satisfaction after shifting to semaglutide treatment. All patients preferred/strongly preferred once-weekly semaglutide over liraglutide in most DID-PQ questionnaire domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from once-daily liraglutide to once-weekly semaglutide led to improvements in both clinical measures of glycemic control and patient-reported satisfaction.

摘要

简介

治疗方法的实施和注射装置的特点已被证明会影响 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者对治疗的看法和偏好。我们旨在评估每周一次的司美格鲁肽与利拉鲁肽相比,在血糖控制不佳的 T2D 患者中的代谢效果和患者报告的满意度。

方法

我们在 2021 年 2 月至 2021 年 8 月期间在一家三级医院的糖尿病中心诊所进行了这项单中心队列研究。我们纳入了血糖控制不佳的 T2D 患者,这些患者在基线时至少接受了 3 个月的利拉鲁肽治疗,然后转为每周一次的司美格鲁肽治疗,并进行了相同时间的随访。比较基线和随访时的动态血糖谱(AGP)指标[即平均血糖水平、血糖变异性(GV)、血糖高于范围(TAR)和血糖在范围内(TIR)]。为了评估转用的满意度,我们使用了经过验证的阿拉伯语版糖尿病治疗满意度问卷状态(DTSQs)和变化(DTSQc),同时使用糖尿病注射装置偏好问卷(DID-PQ)评估了注射装置的偏好。

结果

我们纳入了 52 名患者(25 名男性和 27 名女性),平均年龄为 48(±6)岁,糖尿病病程平均为 7.27(±3.79)年。我们观察到司美格鲁肽治疗后平均 HbA1c 水平显著下降(研究结束时为 7.79%,基线时为 8.07%,p<0.001),体重也显著下降(84.64±7.68 与 87.15±8.011,p<0.001)。与基线时的血糖指标相比,我们观察到平均血糖、GV、TAR 和 TIR 均有显著改善(p<0.001)。DTSQs 和 DTSQc 问卷的数据显示,患者在转为司美格鲁肽治疗后报告的满意度较高。在 DID-PQ 问卷的大多数领域,所有患者都更喜欢/强烈更喜欢每周一次的司美格鲁肽而不是利拉鲁肽。

结论

从每日一次的利拉鲁肽转换为每周一次的司美格鲁肽,可改善血糖控制的临床指标和患者报告的满意度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验