Jude Edward B, Nixon Mark, O'Leary Caroline, Myland Melissa, Gooch Nick, Shaunik Alka, Lew Elisheva
Diabetes Centre, Tameside General Hospital, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.
University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Oct;10(5):1847-1858. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0667-6. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
This retrospective, observational cohort study evaluated the effect of therapy intensification on change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 6 and 12 months post intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) suboptimally controlled on basal insulin (BI) (i.e., HbA1c ≥ 7.5% [≥ 58 mmol/mol]).
Patients with T2D with suboptimal glycemic control using BI were identified from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. Patients who underwent therapy intensification (intensifiers) within 12 months of index 1 (the date of the first incidence of suboptimally controlled HbA1c) were matched (1:1) to patients who did not intensify therapy (non-intensifiers). Index 2 was the date of therapy intensification for intensifiers, or a pseudo date for non-intensifiers that resulted in the same duration from index 1 to index 2 as their matched intensifier patient. Primary outcomes were HbA1c change and proportion of patients achieving the HbA1c target at 6 and 12 months post index 2.
A total of 1342 patients (n = 646 intensifiers; n = 696 non-intensifiers) were included in the analysis. At post index 2, mean HbA1c change was substantially greater at 6 months for intensifiers than for non-intensifiers (- 0.81% vs. - 0.35%), with no additional benefit at 12 months (- 0.81% vs. - 0.49%, respectively). Compared with non-intensifiers, a greater proportion of intensifiers achieved target HbA1c at 6 months (25.1% vs. 18.8%) and at 12 months (33.4% vs. 28.2%).
Many real-world patients with T2D suboptimally controlled with BI do not have their therapy intensified. The results of this study suggest that in this patient population, therapy intensification achieves significant reductions in HbA1c at 6 months post intensification, with little additional clinical benefit at 12 months. This suggests that, for patients who fail to achieve their glycemic targets at 6 months, since no meaningful additional clinical benefit is observed at 12 months when continuing the same therapy, further therapy intensification or change should be promptly considered.
This study and the Rapid Service Fees were funded by Sanofi.
17THIN068.
这项回顾性观察队列研究评估了强化治疗对基础胰岛素(BI)治疗效果欠佳(即糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c]≥7.5%[≥58 mmol/mol])的2型糖尿病(T2D)患者强化治疗后6个月和12个月时糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)变化的影响。
从健康改善网络(THIN)数据库中识别出使用BI血糖控制欠佳的T2D患者。在索引1(HbA1c控制欠佳首次发生日期)后12个月内接受强化治疗(强化组)的患者与未强化治疗的患者(非强化组)进行1:1匹配。索引2是强化组患者的强化治疗日期,或非强化组患者的一个虚拟日期,该日期使得从索引1到索引2的时长与匹配的强化组患者相同。主要结局是索引2后6个月和12个月时HbA1c的变化以及达到HbA1c目标的患者比例。
分析共纳入1342例患者(n = 646例强化组;n = 696例非强化组)。在索引2后,强化组在6个月时的平均HbA1c变化显著大于非强化组(-0.81%对-0.35%),而在12个月时无额外益处(分别为-0.81%对-0.49%)。与非强化组相比,强化组在6个月(25.1%对18.8%)和12个月(33.4%对28.2%)时达到目标HbA1c的患者比例更高。
许多使用BI治疗效果欠佳的现实世界T2D患者未接受强化治疗。本研究结果表明,在该患者群体中,强化治疗在强化后6个月可显著降低HbA1c,而在12个月时几乎没有额外的临床益处。这表明,对于6个月时未达到血糖目标的患者,由于继续相同治疗在12个月时未观察到有意义的额外临床益处,应及时考虑进一步强化治疗或改变治疗方案。
本研究及快速服务费由赛诺菲公司资助。
17THIN068。