Department of Economics, Chancellor College, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0263330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263330. eCollection 2022.
The study used Quasi maximum likelihood estimation (QMLE) on a nationally representative household level data set to estimate the effect of alcohol consumption expenditure on a set of expenditure proportions of other commodities. The results indicate that, the low-income, including the rural population, spent proportionately more on alcohol than their well-off and urban counterparts. Furthermore, the consumption of alcohol crowded-out expenditures on consumer non-durable (food and beverages), durable (housing) and essential services (education). The crowding out of these expenditures clearly has negative impacts on the wellbeing of individuals within households and communities through misallocated household resources. The strong, unequivocal message coming out of the results obtained in this study is that certainly for poorer countries alcohol consumption is inimical to household poverty reduction.
本研究使用拟最大似然估计(QMLE)对全国代表性家庭层面数据集进行了分析,以估计酒精消费支出对一系列其他商品支出比例的影响。结果表明,低收入人群(包括农村人口)在酒精上的支出比例高于富裕人群和城市人群。此外,酒精消费挤出了消费者非耐用品(食品和饮料)、耐用品(住房)和基本服务(教育)的支出。这些支出的挤出显然通过家庭资源的错误配置对家庭和社区内的个人的福祉产生了负面影响。这项研究结果传递出一个强有力、明确无误的信息,即对于较贫穷的国家来说,酒精消费不利于家庭减贫。