• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烟草支出对黑山家庭内资源分配的影响。

Impact of tobacco spending on intrahousehold resource allocation in Montenegro.

机构信息

Finance Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro

Financial Management Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Mediterranean University, Podgorica, Montenegro.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s75-s80. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057786.

DOI:10.1136/tc-2022-057786
PMID:37147127
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11187378/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The main goal of this study is to estimate the crowding out impact of tobacco expenditures on the household budget allocation to other mutually exclusive commodity groups in Montenegro.

METHODOLOGY

The analysis uses the Household Budget Survey data from 2005 to 2017 to estimate a system of Engel curves using a three-stage least squares approach. As the tobacco expenditure variable is endogenous to budget shares on other consumption items, instrumental variables were included to obtain consistent estimates.

RESULTS

Overall, the results confirm the existence of the crowding out effect of tobacco spending on various commodities, such as some food items (eg, cereals, fruits and vegetables and dairy products), clothing, housing and utilities, education and recreation while a positive effect of tobacco consumption was estimated on budget shares on bars and restaurants, alcohol, coffee and sugary drinks. These results are consistent throughout the income groups of households. The estimates indicate that an increase in tobacco expenditures leads to reduction in budget shares on essential goods, which is likely to have negative impacts on the household living standard.

CONCLUSIONS

Tobacco expenditure crowds out household spending on necessities, especially in case of the poorest households, thus increasing inequality, hampering human capital development and potentially causing long-term adverse effects on the households in Montenegro. Our results are similar to evidence from other low and middle-income countries. This paper contributes to the analysis of the crowding out effect of tobacco consumption, which was conducted for the first time in Montenegro.

摘要

背景

本研究的主要目的是估计烟草支出对黑山家庭预算分配给其他相互排斥的商品组的挤出效应。

方法

该分析使用了 2005 年至 2017 年的家庭预算调查数据,采用三阶段最小二乘法系统估计恩格尔曲线。由于烟草支出变量是预算份额对其他消费项目的内生变量,因此包含了工具变量以获得一致的估计。

结果

总体而言,结果证实了烟草支出对各种商品(如某些食品(如谷物、水果和蔬菜以及乳制品)、服装、住房和公用事业、教育和娱乐)存在挤出效应,而烟草消费对酒吧和餐馆、酒精、咖啡和含糖饮料的预算份额存在正向影响。这些结果在家庭的各个收入群体中都是一致的。估计表明,烟草支出的增加导致基本商品预算份额的减少,这可能对家庭生活水平产生负面影响。

结论

烟草支出挤出了家庭在必需品上的支出,尤其是在最贫困的家庭中,从而加剧了不平等,阻碍了人力资本的发展,并可能对黑山的家庭造成长期的不利影响。我们的结果与其他低收入和中等收入国家的证据相似。本文为首次在黑山进行的烟草消费挤出效应分析做出了贡献。

相似文献

1
Impact of tobacco spending on intrahousehold resource allocation in Montenegro.烟草支出对黑山家庭内资源分配的影响。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s75-s80. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057786.
2
Crowding-out effect of tobacco consumption in Indonesia.印度尼西亚烟草消费的挤出效应。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s81-s87. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057843.
3
Crowding-out effect of tobacco consumption in Serbia.塞尔维亚烟草消费的排挤效应。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s88-s94. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057727.
4
The crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure on household spending patterns in Bangladesh.烟草支出对孟加拉国家庭支出模式的挤出效应。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 9;13(10):e0205120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205120. eCollection 2018.
5
Crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure in Vietnam.越南烟草支出的挤出效应。
Tob Control. 2020 Nov;29(Suppl 5):s326-s330. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055307. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
The impact of tobacco expenditures on spending within Turkish households.烟草消费支出对土耳其家庭内部支出的影响。
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;25(5):558-63. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052000. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
7
Crowding out and impoverishing effect of tobacco in Mexico.墨西哥烟草的排挤效应和贫困效应。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s68-s74. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057791.
8
Recreational tobacco consumption and food insecurity among First Nations in Canada.加拿大原住民的娱乐性烟草消费与粮食不安全问题。
Can J Public Health. 2022 Oct;113(5):703-712. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00650-8. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
9
Consumption displacement in households with noncommunicable diseases in Bangladesh.孟加拉国非传染性疾病家庭的消费转移。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 13;13(12):e0208504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208504. eCollection 2018.
10
Socioeconomic inequality in tobacco expenditure in Iran: a cross-sectional analysis at national and subnational levels.伊朗烟草支出的社会经济不平等:国家和国家以下各级别的横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):1031. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09144-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The dual impact of tobacco spending: crowding out essentials and crowding in addictive behaviors.烟草消费的双重影响:挤出必需品并挤入成瘾行为。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 9;15(1):24648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08648-1.
2
From capacity building to collaboration in tobacco economics research.从烟草经济学研究的能力建设到合作
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s34-s37. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057821.
3
Inequality of the crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure in Colombia.哥伦比亚烟草支出挤出效应的不平等性。
PLoS One. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0303328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303328. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of cigarette price increase on fresh food expenditures of low-income South Korean households that spend relatively more on cigarettes.香烟价格上涨对相对更多地消费香烟的韩国低收入家庭购买新鲜食品支出的影响。
Health Policy. 2021 Jan;125(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
2
Crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure in Vietnam.越南烟草支出的挤出效应。
Tob Control. 2020 Nov;29(Suppl 5):s326-s330. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055307. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
3
Coffee and cigarettes: Examining the association between caffeinated beverage consumption and smoking behaviour among youth in the COMPASS study.咖啡与香烟:在COMPASS研究中探讨青少年含咖啡因饮料消费与吸烟行为之间的关联。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Jun 18;19:101148. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101148. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Does tobacco expenditure influence household spending patterns in Ghana?: Evidence from the Ghana 2012/2013 Living Standards Survey.烟草消费支出会影响加纳的家庭支出模式吗?:来自加纳2012/2013年生活水平调查的证据。
Tob Induc Dis. 2020 Jun 1;18:48. doi: 10.18332/tid/120936. eCollection 2020.
5
The effect of tobacco- and alcohol-control policies on household spending patterns in Kenya: An approach using matched difference in differences.烟草和酒控制政策对肯尼亚家庭支出模式的影响:一种使用匹配差分法的研究方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jul;256:113029. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113029. Epub 2020 May 15.
6
The effect of tobacco expenditure on expenditure shares in South African households: A genetic matching approach.烟草支出对南非家庭支出份额的影响:一种遗传匹配方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0222000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222000. eCollection 2019.
7
The crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure on household spending patterns in Bangladesh.烟草支出对孟加拉国家庭支出模式的挤出效应。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 9;13(10):e0205120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205120. eCollection 2018.
8
Killing two birds with one stone? Association between tobacco and alcohol consumption.一石二鸟?烟草与酒精消费之间的关联。
Public Health. 2018 Jan;154:136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.10.019. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
9
Heavier smoking increases coffee consumption: findings from a Mendelian randomization analysis.吸烟量越大,咖啡饮用量越高:孟德尔随机化分析的结果。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1;46(6):1958-1967. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx147.
10
Relationship between smoking and health and education spending in Chile.智利的吸烟与健康及教育支出之间的关系。
Tob Control. 2018 Sep;27(5):560-567. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053857. Epub 2017 Oct 6.