• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迷走神经切断术后胃对改良假饲(MSF)和胰岛素的分泌反应。

Gastric secretory responses to modified sham feeding (MSF) and insulin after vagotomy.

作者信息

Athow A C, Lewin M R, Sewerniak A T, Clark C G

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1986 Feb;73(2):132-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730220.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.1800730220
PMID:3512028
Abstract

Modified sham feeding (MSF) and insulin tests were carried out in 28 patients after vagotomy. Basal and pentagastrin collections were also performed. Using the secretory data from 9 of the patients with endoscopically proven recurrent ulcer as a reference, 20 gastric secretory indices were studied and critical levels were chosen to provide the maximum sensitivity and specificity. The eleven most discriminating indices were then used to evaluate the remaining 19 patients. There was agreement between the responses to MSF and insulin as to the adequacy of vagotomy in 16 of the patients (84 per cent) and contradictory responses in 3 patients (16 per cent). Overall, MSF responses were as discriminating as the responses to insulin. A simplified ward test, based on crude volume measurements in response to MSF is proposed.

摘要

对28例迷走神经切断术后患者进行了改良假饲(MSF)和胰岛素试验。同时也进行了基础胃酸分泌和五肽胃泌素刺激后的胃酸分泌收集。以内镜证实有复发性溃疡的9例患者的分泌数据作为参考,研究了20项胃分泌指标,并选择临界值以提供最大的敏感性和特异性。然后使用11项最具鉴别力的指标对其余19例患者进行评估。16例患者(84%)对MSF和胰岛素的反应在迷走神经切断是否充分方面是一致的,3例患者(16%)存在矛盾反应。总体而言,MSF反应与胰岛素反应具有相同的鉴别力。提出了一种基于对MSF反应的粗略容量测量的简化病房试验。

相似文献

1
Gastric secretory responses to modified sham feeding (MSF) and insulin after vagotomy.迷走神经切断术后胃对改良假饲(MSF)和胰岛素的分泌反应。
Br J Surg. 1986 Feb;73(2):132-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730220.
2
Sham feeding for testing gastric secretory capacities before and after parietal cell vagotomy.在壁细胞迷走神经切断术前和术后进行假饲以测试胃分泌能力。
Br J Surg. 1989 Sep;76(9):946-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800760924.
3
Acid and pepsin responses to graded doses of pentagastrin in duodenal and corporeal gastric ulcer patients before and after selective proximal vagotomy.选择性近端迷走神经切断术前、后十二指肠溃疡和胃溃疡患者对不同剂量五肽胃泌素的胃酸和胃蛋白酶反应
Am J Surg. 1985 Nov;150(5):543-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(85)90433-7.
4
Modified sham feeding test after parietal cell vagotomy for juxtapyloric ulcer disease in patients with and without recurrent ulcers.壁细胞迷走神经切断术后针对有无复发性溃疡的胃幽门附近溃疡病患者的改良假饲试验
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1987 Apr;22(3):279-88. doi: 10.3109/00365528709078592.
5
Gastric acid and pancreatic polypeptide responses to modified sham feeding. Effects of truncal and parietal cell vagotomy.胃酸和胰多肽对改良假饲的反应。迷走神经干切断术和壁细胞迷走神经切断术的影响。
Gut. 1987 Mar;28(3):280-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.28.3.280.
6
Role of acid secretory response to sham feeding in predicting recurrent ulceration after proximal gastric vagotomy.假饲酸分泌反应在预测近端胃迷走神经切断术后复发性溃疡中的作用。
Br J Surg. 1994 Jul;81(7):1002-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810724.
7
Effects of proximal gastric vagotomy on gastric secretory and plasma hormonal responses to sham feeding in patients with duodenal ulcers.近端胃迷走神经切断术对十二指肠溃疡患者假饲时胃分泌及血浆激素反应的影响。
Hepatogastroenterology. 1986 Jun;33(3):115-9.
8
Modified sham feeding and Congo red test in determining completeness of vagotomy.改良假饲法和刚果红试验在判定迷走神经切断术完整性中的应用
Indian J Gastroenterol. 1989 Jul;8(3):145-7.
9
Recurrent ulceration after highly selective vagotomy for duodenal ulcer.十二指肠溃疡高选择性迷走神经切断术后复发性溃疡
Br J Surg. 1981 Oct;68(10):705-10. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800681011.
10
Effects of fundic vagotomy and cholinergic replacement on pentagastrin dose responsive gastric acid and pepsin secretion in man.胃底迷走神经切断术及胆碱能替代对人五肽胃泌素剂量依赖性胃酸和胃蛋白酶分泌的影响。
Gut. 1982 Aug;23(8):675-82. doi: 10.1136/gut.23.8.675.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative relation between gastric acid secretion and changes in urinary acid excretion.胃酸分泌与尿酸排泄变化之间的定量关系。
Gut. 1990 Aug;31(8):862-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.8.862.