Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon.
Corresponding author: Frances L. Lynch, PhD, Center for Health Research, 3800 North Interstate, Portland, OR 97227 (
J Clin Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 1;83(2):21m13976. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21m13976.
To examine whether measures of depression symptom severity could improve understanding of health care costs for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) or treatment-resistant depression (TRD) from the health plan perspective. In this retrospective cohort study within an integrated health system, cohorts consisted of 2 mutually exclusive groups: (1) adults with TRD based on a standard treatment algorithm and (2) adults with MDD, but no TRD, identified through codes. Depression severity was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Patterns of health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs were compared between the TRD and MDD groups overall and within the groups at different symptom levels. A general linear model with a γ distribution and log link for cost outcomes, logistic regression for binary outcomes, and negative binomial regression for count outcomes were used. Patients with TRD (n = 24,534) had greater comorbidity than those in the MDD group (n = 17,628). Mean age in the TRD group was 52.8 years versus 48.2 for MDD ( < .001). Both groups were predominantly female (TRD: 72.8% vs MDD: 66.9%; < .001). Overall, the TRD group had greater costs than the MDD group, with 1.23 times (95% CI, 1.21-1.26; < .001) greater total cost on average over 1 year following index date. Within both groups, those with severe symptoms had greater total mean (SD) costs (TRD: moderate: $12,429 [$23,900] vs severe: $13,344 [$22,895], < .001; low: $12,220 [$31,864] vs severe: $13,344 [$22,895], < .001; MDD: moderate: $8,899 [$20,755] vs severe: $10,098 [$22,853]; < .001; low: $8,752 [$25,800] vs severe: $10,098 [$22,853], < .001). MDD and TRD impose high costs for health systems, with increasing costs as PHQ-9 symptom severity rises. Better understanding of subgroups with different symptom levels could improve clinical care by helping target interventions.
为了从健康计划的角度探讨抑郁症状严重程度的衡量标准是否可以提高对重度抑郁症(MDD)或治疗抵抗性抑郁症(TRD)患者的医疗保健费用的认识。在这个综合医疗系统内的回顾性队列研究中,队列由 2 个相互排斥的组组成:(1)根据标准治疗算法的 TRD 成人;(2)通过代码确定的 MDD 成人,但无 TRD。使用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)来衡量抑郁严重程度。总体上比较了 TRD 组和 MDD 组之间以及不同症状水平的组内的医疗保健资源利用(HRU)和成本模式。对于成本结果,使用具有 γ分布和对数链接的广义线性模型、二元结果的逻辑回归和计数结果的负二项回归。与 MDD 组(n=17628)相比,TRD 组(n=24534)的合并症更多。TRD 组的平均年龄为 52.8 岁,而 MDD 组为 48.2 岁(<0.001)。两组均以女性为主(TRD:72.8% vs MDD:66.9%;<0.001)。总体而言,TRD 组的成本高于 MDD 组,平均而言,在索引日期后的 1 年内,总成本高出 1.23 倍(95%CI,1.21-1.26;<0.001)。在这两个组内,症状严重的患者的总平均(SD)成本更高(TRD:中度:$12429 [23900] vs 严重:$13344 [22895],<0.001;低:$12220 [31864] vs 严重:$13344 [22895],<0.001;MDD:中度:$8899 [20755] vs 严重:$10098 [22853];<0.001;低:$8752 [25800] vs 严重:$10098 [22853],<0.001)。MDD 和 TRD 给卫生系统带来了高昂的成本,随着 PHQ-9 症状严重程度的增加,成本也在增加。更好地了解不同症状水平的亚组可以通过帮助确定干预目标来改善临床护理。