Department of Large Animal Medicine, 2200 College Station Rd., Athens, GA 30605 USA.
Educational Resources Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA.
J Vet Med Educ. 2023 Feb;50(1):121-125. doi: 10.3138/jvme-2021-0139. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
The administration, uptake, and elimination of inhalant anesthetics is a challenging topic in the veterinary curriculum, and lecture-based learning is often insufficient to ensure that students understand these concepts. We hypothesized that the use of an interactive electronic book (e-book) would enhance student comprehension of the material. Two sequential Doctorate of Veterinary Medicine student cohorts participated in a prospective controlled study. The first cohort received traditional lecture-based learning while the second cohort was taught the topic using an interactive e-book. Student comprehension of the material was assessed twice during the course via multiple-choice questions: five questions in a midcourse quiz and seven within the final exam. At the end of the course, students also completed a Likert survey assessing their confidence regarding the topic. Averaged across assessment types, students taught using the interactive e-book scored higher than those taught via the traditional method < .001). Final exam scores were significantly higher in the e-book cohort compared with the lecture-based cohort < .001). However, there was no difference in quiz scores between groups = .109). No significant difference was found between groups in responses to the Likert survey. In conclusion, students using the interactive e-book had better comprehension of the material than students in the traditional lecture group as measured by their scores on multiple-choice question assessments. Future studies are needed to determine whether this advantage persists later in the curriculum when students apply these concepts in the clinical year.
吸入麻醉剂的管理、摄入和消除是兽医课程中的一个具有挑战性的课题,基于讲座的学习通常不足以确保学生理解这些概念。我们假设使用互动式电子书(电子书)将增强学生对材料的理解。两个连续的兽医学博士学生队列参与了一项前瞻性对照研究。第一队列接受传统的基于讲座的学习,而第二队列则使用互动电子书进行教学。在课程中通过多项选择题两次评估学生对材料的理解:课程中期测验中的五个问题和期末考试中的七个问题。在课程结束时,学生还完成了一项李克特量表调查,评估他们对该主题的信心。在评估类型的平均值中,使用互动电子书教学的学生比使用传统方法教学的学生得分更高 <.001)。电子书组的期末考试成绩明显高于讲座组 <.001)。然而,两组在测验成绩上没有差异 =.109)。在李克特量表调查的回答中,两组之间没有发现显著差异。总之,与传统讲座组的学生相比,使用互动电子书的学生在多项选择题评估中的得分表明,他们对材料的理解更好。需要进一步的研究来确定当学生在临床年应用这些概念时,这种优势是否会在课程的后期持续存在。