• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚裔人群和非亚裔人群经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板治疗的降级:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

De-escalation of antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention among East Asians and non-East Asians: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 2 Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Feb 4;22(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02476-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12872-022-02476-1
PMID:35120454
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8815247/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To study the impact of de-escalation antiplatelet therapy retaining P2Y12 inhibition on major bleeding and ischemic outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among East Asians and non-East Asians was unclear.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials through September 2020. Eight trials were included, which studied de-escalation of DAPT (D-DAPT, switching to P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, or switching to clopidogrel or dose reduction of the P2Y12 inhibitor after 1 to 3 months) versus 12 months standard DAPT (S-DAPT). The primary outcomes data was conducted using random effects models.

RESULTS

Among the 8 included trials consisting of 37,775 patients, 62.6% presented with acute coronary syndrome. The median follow-up duration ranged from 12 to 24 months. Compared with S-DAPT, D-DAPT was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (RR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.93, p = 0.02); however, this was only observed among East-Asians (RR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-0.99, p = 0.048). Among non-East Asians, the rate of major bleeding was similar between the two groups (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.46-1.14, p = 0.17, p for interaction = 0.59). There were no significant differences in the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between D-DAPT and S-DAPT treatment among both East Asians (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.08, p = 0.18) and non-East Asians (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-1.00, p = 0.059, p for interaction = 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

The De-escalation strategy that retains P2Y12 inhibition after a PCI was associated with reduced risk of bleeding events, which was only demonstrated in East Asians patients, and not in non-East Asian patients.

摘要

背景

在亚洲人和非亚洲人群中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,减少抗血小板治疗并保留 P2Y12 抑制作用对主要出血和缺血结局的影响尚不清楚。

方法

我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆截至 2020 年 9 月的随机对照试验。纳入了 8 项研究,这些研究比较了 DAPT 降级(D-DAPT,转换为 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗,或在 1 至 3 个月后转换为氯吡格雷或减少 P2Y12 抑制剂剂量)与 12 个月标准 DAPT(S-DAPT)。主要结局数据采用随机效应模型进行分析。

结果

在纳入的 8 项试验中,共包括 37775 例患者,其中 62.6%为急性冠状动脉综合征患者。中位随访时间为 12 至 24 个月。与 S-DAPT 相比,D-DAPT 主要出血风险较低(RR=0.67,95%CI 0.48-0.93,p=0.02);然而,这种结果仅在亚洲人群中观察到(RR=0.61,95%CI 0.37-0.99,p=0.048)。在非亚洲人群中,两组之间的主要出血发生率相似(RR=0.73,95%CI 0.46-1.14,p=0.17,p 交互作用=0.59)。在亚洲人群中(RR=0.84,95%CI 0.66-1.08,p=0.18)和非亚洲人群中(RR=0.89,95%CI 0.79-1.00,p=0.059,p 交互作用=0.71),D-DAPT 与 S-DAPT 治疗的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率无显著差异。

结论

PCI 后保留 P2Y12 抑制作用的降级策略与出血事件风险降低相关,这一结果仅在亚洲人群中得到证实,而非亚洲人群中则没有。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af1/8815247/c4139b616b9e/12872_2022_2476_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af1/8815247/4be26c6bc69d/12872_2022_2476_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af1/8815247/05e4daf04727/12872_2022_2476_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af1/8815247/4e5cad5d3d56/12872_2022_2476_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af1/8815247/55755cf13b96/12872_2022_2476_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af1/8815247/c4139b616b9e/12872_2022_2476_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af1/8815247/4be26c6bc69d/12872_2022_2476_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af1/8815247/05e4daf04727/12872_2022_2476_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af1/8815247/4e5cad5d3d56/12872_2022_2476_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af1/8815247/55755cf13b96/12872_2022_2476_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af1/8815247/c4139b616b9e/12872_2022_2476_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
De-escalation of antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention among East Asians and non-East Asians: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.亚裔人群和非亚裔人群经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板治疗的降级:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Feb 4;22(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02476-1.
2
De-escalation of Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in East Asian Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.东亚急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板治疗的降级。
Clin Ther. 2024 Feb;46(2):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.08.004. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
3
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Drug-Eluting Stents: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和药物洗脱支架置入术后双联抗血小板治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 13;142(15):1425-1436. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046308. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
4
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.
5
Short dual antiplatelet therapy followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.短期双联抗血小板治疗继以 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后延长双联抗血小板治疗:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jan 21;42(4):308-319. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa739.
6
Safety and efficacy of antiplatelet regimens after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stents: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)使用药物洗脱支架后抗血小板治疗方案的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 May-Jun;63(3):243-248. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
7
The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in East Asian patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.东亚经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中药物洗脱支架患者双联抗血小板治疗的最佳持续时间:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Coron Artery Dis. 2021 Mar 1;32(2):119-130. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000921.
8
Guided and unguided de-escalation from potent P2Y12 inhibitors among patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.急性冠脉综合征患者中从强效 P2Y12 抑制剂的有指导和无指导降级:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 Aug 11;8(5):492-502. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab068.
9
Comparison of Unguided De-Escalation Versus Guided Selection of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征后未引导的降阶梯与有引导的双重抗血小板治疗选择的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Aug;15(8):e011990. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.011990. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
10
Strategy of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者的双联抗血小板治疗策略:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 15;389:131157. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131157. Epub 2023 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
De-Escalation Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Prevail over Potent P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergone Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,降阶梯双联抗血小板治疗优于强效P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 25;23(11):360. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2311360. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Models for P2Y12 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Clinical Appraisal Using Exposure Simulation.用于 P2Y12 抑制剂的群体药代动力学/药效动力学模型:基于暴露模拟的系统评价和临床评估。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2024 Mar;63(3):303-316. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01335-2. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
3

本文引用的文献

1
P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy or dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary revascularisation: individual patient level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.冠状动脉血运重建术后P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗或双联抗血小板治疗:随机对照试验的个体患者水平荟萃分析
BMJ. 2021 Jun 16;373:n1332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1332.
2
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.2020年欧洲心脏病学会非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Jun;74(6):544. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.05.002.
3
Prasugrel-based de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS): an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised trial.
Antiplatelet Therapy Aims and Strategies in Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome or Stable Coronary Artery Disease.亚洲急性冠状动脉综合征或稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的抗血小板治疗目标与策略
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 15;11(24):7440. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247440.
4
Effect of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on the pharmacodynamics and clinical outcomes for patients treated with ticagrelor: a systematic review with qualitative and quantitative meta-analysis.CYP2C19 基因多态性对替格瑞洛治疗患者的药效学和临床结局的影响:系统评价及定性和定量荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02547-3.
基于普拉格雷的急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗降级(HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS):一项开放标签、多中心、非劣效性随机试验。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 10;396(10257):1079-1089. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31791-8. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
4
Antithrombotic Strategy for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Perspective from East Asia.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的抗栓策略:来自东亚的观点
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 23;9(6):1963. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061963.
5
The Safety and Efficacy of Aspirin Discontinuation on a Background of a P2Y Inhibitor in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.阿司匹林停药联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者 P2Y 抑制剂的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Aug 11;142(6):538-545. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046251. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
6
P2Y12 inhibitors monotherapy after short course of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including 29 089 patients.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者短程双联抗血小板治疗后应用 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗:纳入 29089 例患者的随机临床试验荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021 May 23;7(3):196-205. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa038.
7
Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要出血和心血管事件的影响:TICO 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2407-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580.
8
[2019 Chinese Society of Cardiology (CSC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction].[2019中国心脏学会(CSC)ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者诊断和治疗指南]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 24;47(10):766-783. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.10.003.
9
Ticagrelor with or without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients after PCI.替格瑞洛联合或不联合阿司匹林用于 PCI 术后高危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):2032-2042. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908419. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
10
Effect of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SMART-CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与双联抗血小板治疗对心血管事件的影响:SMART-CHOICE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2428-2437. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8146.