Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Mar;148:110181. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110181. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
To analyze the quantitative and qualitative image quality of low-dose CT scans of the abdomen on a novel photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison with a traditional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT).
Consecutive patients with clinically indicated low-dose CT were scanned on a PCD-CT and compared with a BMI-matched EID-CT-cohort scanned during the same timeframe. Radiation dose, image noise, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured for each patient. Furthermore, image quality and conspicuity of abdominal structures (adrenal glands, mesenteric vessels, ureters, and renal pelvis) were assessed on 5-point Likert-scales (1 = very poor quality/not detectable; 5 = excellent quality/differentiability).
Twenty patients (mean age 46.2 [range: 19-77]; 13 men) were included. Image noise was significantly lower (24.9 ± 3.3 vs. 31.4 ± 5.6 SD HU, p < 0.001) and SNR significantly higher (2.1 ± 0.3 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4; p < 0.001) on the PCD-CT. Subjective image quality was substantially higher (4.0 ± 0.3 vs. 3.1 ± 0.6; p < 0.001) and conspicuity better for the renal pelvis, ureters, and mesenteric vessels on the PCD-CT. There was no significant difference in the conspicuity of the adrenal glands. With increasing BMI (1-4 BMI quartile), noise increased, and SNR decreased more strongly on the EID-CT than on the PCD-CT (ΔNoise: 39% vs. 2%, ΔSNR: -33% vs. -7% for EID-CT vs. PCD-CT, respectively) while radiation dose increased comparably (70 vs. 59%).
Low-dose CT scans of the abdomen performed on a novel PCD-CT exhibit reduced noise, higher SNR, increased subjective image quality, and superior conspicuity of abdominal fine structures compared to scans in comparable patients on an EID-CT.
分析新型光子计数探测器 CT(PCD-CT)与传统能量积分探测器 CT(EID-CT)腹部低剂量 CT 扫描的定量和定性图像质量。
连续纳入临床疑似低剂量 CT 的患者在 PCD-CT 上进行扫描,并与同期 BMI 匹配的 EID-CT 队列进行比较。对每位患者测量辐射剂量、图像噪声和信噪比(SNR)。此外,使用 5 分李克特量表(1=质量差/不可检测;5=质量优/可分辨)评估腹部结构(肾上腺、肠系膜血管、输尿管和肾盂)的图像质量和显著性。
共纳入 20 名患者(平均年龄 46.2 岁[范围:19-77 岁];13 名男性)。PCD-CT 上的图像噪声明显更低(24.9±3.3 与 31.4±5.6 SD HU,p<0.001),SNR 明显更高(2.1±0.3 与 1.5±0.4;p<0.001)。PCD-CT 上的主观图像质量显著更高(4.0±0.3 与 3.1±0.6;p<0.001),肾盂、输尿管和肠系膜血管的显著性更好。肾上腺的显著性无明显差异。随着 BMI(1-4 BMI 四分位数)的增加,EID-CT 上的噪声增加,而 PCD-CT 上的 SNR 下降更为明显(EID-CT 与 PCD-CT 分别为 39%与 2%,ΔSNR:-33%与-7%),而辐射剂量增加则相当(70 与 59%)。
与 EID-CT 相比,新型 PCD-CT 腹部低剂量 CT 扫描显示噪声降低、SNR 增加、主观图像质量提高、腹部精细结构显著性更好。