Low-dose high-resolution chest CT in adults with cystic fibrosis: intraindividual comparison between photon-counting and energy-integrating detector CT.

BACKGROUND

Regular disease monitoring with low-dose high-resolution (LD-HR) computed tomography (CT) scans is necessary for the clinical management of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). The aim of this study was to compare the image quality and radiation dose of LD-HR protocols between photon-counting CT (PCCT) and energy-integrating detector system CT (EID-CT) in pwCF.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 23 pwCF undergoing LD-HR chest CT with PCCT who had previously undergone LD-HR chest CT with EID-CT. An intraindividual comparison of radiation dose and image quality was conducted. The study measured the dose-length product, volumetric CT dose index, effective dose and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Three blinded radiologists assessed the overall image quality, image sharpness, and image noise using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (deficient) to 5 (very good) for image quality and image sharpness and from 1 (very high) to 5 (very low) for image noise.

RESULTS

PCCT used approximately 42% less radiation dose than EID-CT (median effective dose 0.54 versus 0.93 mSv, p < 0.001). PCCT was consistently rated higher than EID-CT for overall image quality and image sharpness. Additionally, image noise was lower with PCCT compared to EID-CT. The average SNR of the lung parenchyma was lower with PCCT compared to EID-CT (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In pwCF, LD-HR chest CT protocols using PCCT scans provided significantly better image quality and reduced radiation exposure compared to EID-CT.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

In pwCF, regular follow-up could be performed through photon-counting CT instead of EID-CT, with substantial advantages in terms of both lower radiation exposure and increased image quality.

KEY POINTS

Photon-counting CT (PCCT) and energy-integrating detector system CT (EID-CT) were compared in 23 people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). Image quality was rated higher for PCCT than for EID-CT. PCCT used approximately 42% less radiation dose and offered superior image quality than EID-CT.