So Suzanne Ho-Wai, Zhu Chen, Lincoln Tania M, Gaudiano Brandon A, Kingston Jessica L, Ellett Lyn, Morris Eric M J
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Schizophr Res. 2022 Mar;241:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.01.045. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in paranoid thinking has been reported internationally. The development of the Pandemic Paranoia Scale (PPS) has provided a reliable assessment of various facets of pandemic paranoia. This study aimed to (i) identify classes of individuals with varying levels of general paranoia and pandemic paranoia, and (ii) examine associations between classification and worry, core beliefs, and pro-health behaviours.
An international sample of adults (N = 2510) across five sites completed the Revised-Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale and the PPS. Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted using these two paranoia variables. Classes were compared on trait worry (Penn State Worry Questionnaire), beliefs about self/others (Brief Core Schema Scales), and pro-health behaviour.
Three latent classes emerged: Class 1 with low R-GPTS and PPS scores, Class 2 with a high R-GPTS score and a moderate PPS score, and Class 3 with high R-GPTS and PPS scores. Compared to Class 1, Classes 2-3 were associated with more worry and negative self- and other-beliefs. Class 3 was further characterised by greater positive-self beliefs and less engagement in pro-health behaviours. Engagement in pro-health behaviours was positively correlated with interpersonal mistrust and negatively correlated with paranoid conspiracy and persecutory threat.
Individuals with a general paranoia tendency were more likely to respond to the global health threats in a suspicious and distrusting way. Our findings suggested that worry and negative self/other beliefs may contribute to not just general paranoia but also pandemic paranoia. The preliminary finding of a link between pro-health behaviours and interpersonal mistrust warrants further examination.
在新冠疫情期间,国际上报告称偏执思维有所增加。大流行偏执量表(PPS)的开发为大流行偏执的各个方面提供了可靠的评估。本研究旨在(i)识别具有不同程度的一般偏执和大流行偏执的个体类别,以及(ii)检查分类与担忧、核心信念和促进健康行为之间的关联。
来自五个地点的国际成人样本(N = 2510)完成了修订版绿色偏执思维量表和PPS。使用这两个偏执变量进行潜在类别分析(LCA)。比较了不同类别在特质担忧(宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷)、关于自我/他人的信念(简短核心图式量表)和促进健康行为方面的差异。
出现了三个潜在类别:第1类R - GPTS和PPS得分低,第2类R - GPTS得分高且PPS得分中等,第3类R - GPTS和PPS得分高。与第1类相比,第2 - 3类与更多的担忧以及消极的自我和他人信念相关。第3类的进一步特征是更积极的自我信念以及较少参与促进健康行为。参与促进健康行为与人际不信任呈正相关,与偏执阴谋和迫害威胁呈负相关。
具有一般偏执倾向的个体更有可能以怀疑和不信任的方式应对全球健康威胁。我们的研究结果表明,担忧和消极的自我/他人信念可能不仅导致一般偏执,还导致大流行偏执。促进健康行为与人际不信任之间联系的初步发现值得进一步研究。