Cheng Qinqin, Xu Binbin, Ng Marques S N, Duan Yinglong, So Winnie K W
The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Mar;127:104162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104162. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
Many of the needs of caregivers of patients with cancer are unmet, particularly their informational and psychological needs. Psychoeducational interventions that focus on providing caregivers with information, and on meeting their emotional and psychosocial needs, may therefore be effective.
To evaluate the effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions on the outcomes of caregivers of patients with cancer and identify characteristics of effective psychoeducational interventions.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
The databases of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete, the British Nursing Index, PsycINFO, Ovid Emcare, Scopus, Chinese Journal Net, and Wan Fang Data were searched in December 2020. Clinical trial registers, related websites and reference lists of included studies were also examined.
The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to appraise the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was conducted, and narrative syntheses were performed where meta-analysis was inappropriate.
Fourteen articles describing 12 studies were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that psychoeducational interventions have short-term (immediately post-intervention) positive effects on relieving anxiety [SMD: -0.50, 95%CI: (-0.97, -0.02), p = 0.04], depression [SMD: -0.54, 95%CI: (-0.76, -0.32), p < 0.00001] and caregiver burden [SMD: -0.57, 95%CI: (-0.87, -0.27), p = 0.0002] and improving their quality of life [SMD: 0.42, 95%CI: (0.23, 0.62), p < 0.0001) and self-efficacy [SMD: 0.31, 95%CI: (0.09, 0.53), p = 0.006] in the caregivers of patients with cancer. They also showed long-term (at least 3 months post-intervention) positive effects on improving physical health [SMD: 0.26, 95%CI: (0.05, 0.47), p = 0.02]. The types of psychoeducational interventions varied in the 12 studies. However, the main contents of effective psychoeducational interventions included tasks related to health care provisions for patients, caregiver self-care and stress management, and relationship and coping skills. In general, most studies had short follow-up periods and involved caregivers of older patients with cancer (>40 years old).
Psychoeducational interventions may have short-term desirable effects on caregivers' anxiety, depression, quality of life, burden and self-efficacy and long-term desirable effects on physical health. Individual psychoeducational intervention varied in contents, delivery mode, dosage and format. Research is needed to further specify the optimal combination of contents. Further high-quality RCTs are warranted, with longer follow-up periods, for caregivers of patients with cancer, especially caregivers of younger patients with cancer.
癌症患者照料者的许多需求未得到满足,尤其是他们的信息需求和心理需求。因此,侧重于为照料者提供信息并满足其情感和心理社会需求的心理教育干预措施可能会有效。
评估心理教育干预措施对癌症患者照料者结局的有效性,并确定有效心理教育干预措施的特征。
对随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
2020年12月检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、护理及相关健康文献累积索引完整版、英国护理索引、PsycINFO、Ovid Emcare、Scopus、中国知网和万方数据等数据库。还查阅了临床试验注册库、相关网站及纳入研究的参考文献列表。
采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的质量。进行荟萃分析,在不适合进行荟萃分析的情况下进行叙述性综合分析。
纳入了14篇描述12项研究的文章。荟萃分析结果表明,心理教育干预措施对缓解癌症患者照料者的焦虑[标准化均数差(SMD):-0.50,95%置信区间(CI):(-0.97,-0.02),P = 0.04]、抑郁[SMD:-0.54,95%CI:(-0.76,-0.32),P < 0.00001]和照料者负担[SMD:-0.57,95%CI:(-0.87,-0.27),P = 0.0002]以及改善其生活质量[SMD:0.42,95%CI:(0.23,0.62),P < 0.0001]和自我效能感[SMD:0.31,95%CI:(0.09,0.53),P = 0.006]具有短期(干预后即刻)积极影响。它们还显示出对改善身体健康的长期(干预后至少3个月)积极影响[SMD:0.26,95%CI:(0.05,0.47),P = 0.02]。12项研究中,心理教育干预措施的类型各不相同。然而,有效心理教育干预措施的主要内容包括与患者医疗保健、照料者自我护理和压力管理以及人际关系和应对技巧相关的任务。总体而言,大多数研究的随访期较短,且涉及老年癌症患者(>40岁)的照料者。
心理教育干预措施可能对照料者的焦虑、抑郁、生活质量、负担和自我效能感有短期理想效果,对身体健康有长期理想效果。个体心理教育干预在内容形式、实施方式、剂量和形式上各不相同。需要进一步研究以明确内容的最佳组合。有必要开展针对癌症患者照料者,尤其是年轻癌症患者照料者的高质量随机对照试验,并延长随访期。