Department of Family Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Nutr Res. 2022 Apr;100:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
The evidence for whether marginal food security (FS) is a distinct category from high FS concerning self-rated health (SRH) is insufficient. This cross-sectional study hypothesized that members of marginal FS households would have worse SRH than those of high FS households. Additionally, this study explored whether this association differs according to gender and age group (19-59 years vs. ≥60 years). FS levels (high, marginal, and low), SRH levels (very good, good, fair, poor, and very poor), and confounding factors (sociodemographic factors, health behaviors, and health status) were assessed in 18,635 adults from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Complex sampling ordinal regression was conducted. Twelve percent of study subjects belonged to marginal FS households. After adjusting for all confounding variables, the odds ratios [95% confidence intervals] for poorer SRH in members of marginal FS households were 1.24 [1.10-1.41] (P < .001) than those of high FS. The interaction between FS level and gender or age was not significant. Regardless of gender, members of marginal FS households rated their health worse than those of high FS households (odds ratios, 1.25-1.34; P < .05). In the age group of 19 to 59 years, members of marginal FS households rated their health worse than those of high FS households. The association between marginal FS and poorer SRH was not significant in the age group ≥60 years. In conclusion, the research hypothesis was acceptable because members of marginal FS households had worse SRH than those of high FS households.
边缘粮食安全(FS)是否与自我报告健康(SRH)的高 FS 是不同的类别,这方面的证据不足。本横断面研究假设边缘 FS 家庭的成员的 SRH 比高 FS 家庭的成员差。此外,本研究还探讨了这种关联是否因性别和年龄组(19-59 岁与≥60 岁)而异。在韩国国家健康和营养检查调查中,对 18635 名成年人进行了 FS 水平(高、边缘和低)、SRH 水平(非常好、好、一般、差和非常差)以及混杂因素(社会人口因素、健康行为和健康状况)的评估。采用复杂抽样有序回归进行分析。12%的研究对象属于边缘 FS 家庭。在调整所有混杂变量后,边缘 FS 家庭成员的 SRH 较差的比值比(95%置信区间)为 1.24 [1.10-1.41](P <.001)。FS 水平和性别或年龄之间的交互作用不显著。无论性别如何,边缘 FS 家庭的成员对自己的健康评价都比高 FS 家庭的成员差(比值比,1.25-1.34;P <.05)。在 19 至 59 岁年龄组中,边缘 FS 家庭的成员对自己的健康评价比高 FS 家庭的成员差。在年龄组≥60 岁时,边缘 FS 与较差的 SRH 之间没有显著关联。总之,由于边缘 FS 家庭的成员的 SRH 比高 FS 家庭的成员差,因此研究假设是可以接受的。