Damian Fernanda Bronzon, de Almeida Fernando Kude, Fernandes Fernando Schmidt, Jimenez Mirela Foresti
Department of Oncology, Hospital Fêmina, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Health Science: Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jan 22;39:100934. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100934. eCollection 2022 Feb.
To assess the impact of hydronephrosis and kidney function in newly diagnosed advanced cervical cancer patients.
A retrospective cohort study of newly diagnosed cervical cancer stage IIIB to IVB was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Brazil. Data from clinical records between 2014 and 2018 were reviewed.
A total of 285 women with advanced cervical cancer and no previous cancer treatment were included. 108 (37.9%) patients were diagnosed with hydronephrosis (HN) before or during the first treatment, 49 (17.2%) patients underwent ureteral obstruction relief, and emergency hemodialysis was performed in 17 patients due to uremia. The median overall survival (mOS) was 46.9 months for non-HN, 19.2 months for unilateral-HN, and 10.0 months for bilateral-HN (non-HN vs HN-groups, p = 0.0001). Patients with eGFR >= 60 mL/min/1.73 m, before or during the first cancer treatment, had mOS of 46.9 months, 23.5 months, and 11.1 months for non-HN, unilateral-HN and bilateral-HN, respectively (non-HN vs bilateral-HN, p = 0.002). Patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m had mOS 23.4 months, 19.2 months, and 10.0 months for non-HN, unilateral-HN and bilateral-HN, respectively (non-HN vs bilateral-HN, p = 0.003). In the HN group, mOS was 11.2 months among those who underwent urinary diversion and 15.6 months among those who did not; p = 0.2. On multivariate analysis, cancer treatment, FIGO stage, and HN were prognostic factors for OS; however eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m does not appear to be associated with worse survival by itself (p = 0.7).
HN seems to have a negative effect on survival of patients with cervical cancer even after adjustment for FIGO stage and cancer treatment. The mOS does not appear to be worse in patients with HN who required urinary diversion compared to those who did not.
评估新诊断的晚期宫颈癌患者肾积水及肾功能的影响。
在巴西一家三级医院对新诊断为宫颈癌IIIB至IVB期的患者进行回顾性队列研究。回顾了2014年至2018年临床记录中的数据。
共纳入285例既往未接受过癌症治疗的晚期宫颈癌女性患者。108例(37.9%)患者在首次治疗前或治疗期间被诊断为肾积水(HN),49例(17.2%)患者接受了输尿管梗阻解除术,17例患者因尿毒症进行了急诊血液透析。非HN患者的中位总生存期(mOS)为46.9个月,单侧HN患者为19.2个月,双侧HN患者为10.0个月(非HN组与HN组比较,p = 0.0001)。在首次癌症治疗前或治疗期间估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²的患者中,非HN、单侧HN和双侧HN患者的mOS分别为46.9个月、23.5个月和11.1个月(非HN组与双侧HN组比较,p = 0.002)。eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²的患者中,非HN、单侧HN和双侧HN患者的mOS分别为23.4个月、19.2个月和10.0个月(非HN组与双侧HN组比较,p = 0.003)。在HN组中,接受尿流改道的患者mOS为11.2个月,未接受尿流改道的患者为15.6个月;p = 0.2。多因素分析显示,癌症治疗、国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期和HN是总生存期的预后因素;然而,eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²本身似乎与较差的生存率无关(p = 0.7)。
即使在调整FIGO分期和癌症治疗因素后,HN似乎仍对宫颈癌患者的生存有负面影响。与未接受尿流改道的HN患者相比,接受尿流改道的患者mOS似乎并未更差。