Konopitski Andrew, Okafor Chielozor, Smith Brendan, Baldwin Keith, Sheth Neil P
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Luke's University Medical Center, 801 Ostrum St., Bethlehem, PA, 18015, USA.
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Building 421, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Feb;143(2):1081-1094. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04357-w. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
While surgical technique and implant technology for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has improved over the years, it is unclear whether recent progress has translated to improved clinical outcomes for young patients. The goal of this study is to determine trends in (1) indications, (2) surgical technique (3) clinical and radiographic outcomes, and (4) survivorship for THA in patients younger than 30 years of age.
MedLine, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched using several key phrases for articles focusing on THA performed on patients younger than 30 years of age between 1971 and 2020. A total of 34 qualifying articles were identified and stratified into three groups according to operative years and compared to one another on the basis of (1) indications; (2) fixation technique; (3) implant design; (4) clinical and radiographic outcomes; and (7) survivorship.
The mean patient age at index THA were 20.5 (9-30), 22.1 (11-30) and 21.5 (10-30) years, respectively, for each study group. Over time, patients underwent fewer THAs for JRA (Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis) (p < 0.001) but more for post-treatment and iatrogenic avascular necrosis (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). Early THAs primarily used metal on UHMWPE (Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene) (71.7%, p < 0.001), modern THA predominantly use ceramic on HXLPE (Highly cross-linked polyethylene) (42.5%, p < 0.001). Early fixation methods used cement (60.4%, p < 0.001), and modern fixation primarily use press fit technology (95.9%, p < 0.001). Prevalence of radiographic loosening decreased significantly (p < 0.001) over time. There was no significant difference in clinical improvement on HHS. Lastly, fewer patients required THA revision in recent decades (p < 0.001).
Advances in surgical technique and technology have served to improve implant longevity. Surprisingly, subjective clinical scores showed no significant improvement over time, suggesting that early iterations of THA were extremely successful.
尽管多年来全髋关节置换术(THA)的手术技术和植入技术有所改进,但尚不清楚最近的进展是否转化为年轻患者更好的临床结果。本研究的目的是确定30岁以下患者THA在(1)适应症、(2)手术技术、(3)临床和影像学结果以及(4)生存率方面的趋势。
使用几个关键词在MedLine、Cochrane、EMBASE和谷歌学术上搜索1971年至2020年间针对30岁以下患者进行THA的文章。共识别出34篇符合条件的文章,并根据手术年份分为三组,然后基于(1)适应症;(2)固定技术;(3)植入物设计;(4)临床和影像学结果;以及(7)生存率进行相互比较。
每个研究组初次THA时的平均患者年龄分别为20.5(9 - 30)岁、22.1(11 - 30)岁和21.5(10 - 30)岁。随着时间的推移,因青少年类风湿性关节炎(JRA)接受THA的患者减少(p < 0.001),但因治疗后和医源性股骨头缺血性坏死接受THA的患者增多(p < 0.001;p < 0.001)。早期THA主要使用金属对超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)(71.7%,p < 0.001),现代THA主要使用陶瓷对高交联聚乙烯(HXLPE)(42.5%,p < 0.001)。早期固定方法使用骨水泥(60.4%,p < 0.001),现代固定主要使用压配技术(95.9%,p < 0.001)。影像学松动的发生率随时间显著降低(p < 0.001)。髋关节Harris评分(HHS)的临床改善情况无显著差异。最后,近几十年来需要进行THA翻修的患者减少(p < 0.001)。
手术技术和技术的进步有助于提高植入物的使用寿命。令人惊讶的是,主观临床评分并未随时间显著改善,这表明THA的早期版本非常成功。