• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌术后尿潴留发生率低于腹腔镜手术。

Lower Incidence of Postoperative Urinary Retention in Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Surgery.

机构信息

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Dig Surg. 2022;39(2-3):75-82. doi: 10.1159/000522229. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1159/000522229
PMID:35130545
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The incidence and clinical significance of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) remain high. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of POUR and related risk factors in patients who underwent total mesorectal excision (TMR) for low rectal cancer.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected colorectal database from a single center. Data from patients who underwent surgery for low rectal cancer between September 2006 and May 2017 were analyzed to assess the risk factors of POUR. POUR was considered inability to void after urinary catheter removal requiring catheter reinsertion and difficulty in bladder emptying requiring intermittent catheterization.

RESULTS

Of 555 patients with low rectal cancer, 78 (14.1%) developed POUR. Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, laparoscopic TMR (odds ratio [OR]; 2.114, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.212-3.689, p = 0.008) and postoperative ileus (OR; 2.389, 95% CI; 1.282-4.450, p = 0.006) were independent risk factors of POUR. Male gender, advanced age, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, longer operative time, abdominoperineal resection, and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection were not associated with POUR. Advanced age over 65 years also failed to show statistical significance (OR; 1.604, 95% CI; 0.965-2.668, p = 0.068).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic approach and postoperative ileus are risk factors for POUR after low rectal cancer surgery. We postulate that the benefits of robotic surgical systems compared to a laparoscopic approach may reduce the incidence of POUR.

摘要

引言

术后尿潴留(POUR)的发生率和临床意义仍然很高。本研究旨在评估接受直肠系膜全切除术(TMR)治疗低位直肠癌患者的 POUR 发生率和相关危险因素。

方法

本研究是对单中心前瞻性收集的结直肠数据库进行的回顾性研究。分析了 2006 年 9 月至 2017 年 5 月期间因低位直肠癌接受手术治疗的患者的数据,以评估 POUR 的危险因素。POUR 被定义为拔除导尿管后无法排尿,需要重新插入导尿管,以及排空膀胱困难,需要间歇性导尿。

结果

在 555 例低位直肠癌患者中,78 例(14.1%)发生了 POUR。基于多变量逻辑回归分析,腹腔镜 TMR(比值比 [OR];2.114,95%置信区间 [CI];1.212-3.689,p = 0.008)和术后肠梗阻(OR;2.389,95%CI;1.282-4.450,p = 0.006)是 POUR 的独立危险因素。男性、高龄、新辅助放化疗、手术时间较长、腹会阴联合切除术和侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术与 POUR 无关。年龄超过 65 岁也没有统计学意义(OR;1.604,95%CI;0.965-2.668,p = 0.068)。

结论

腹腔镜入路和术后肠梗阻是低位直肠癌手术后 POUR 的危险因素。我们推测,与腹腔镜入路相比,机器人手术系统的优势可能会降低 POUR 的发生率。

相似文献

1
Lower Incidence of Postoperative Urinary Retention in Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Surgery.机器人全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌术后尿潴留发生率低于腹腔镜手术。
Dig Surg. 2022;39(2-3):75-82. doi: 10.1159/000522229. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
2
Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection: Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.与腹腔镜切除术相比,机器人切除术是直肠癌的一个良好预后因素:使用倾向评分匹配的长期生存分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Mar;60(3):266-273. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000770.
3
Early Removal of the Urinary Catheter After Total or Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer Is Safe.直肠癌全直肠系膜切除或肿瘤特异性直肠系膜切除术后早期拔除导尿管是安全的。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jul;58(7):686-91. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000386.
4
[Risk factors of postoperative urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery].[直肠癌手术后尿潴留的危险因素]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Mar 25;20(3):295-299.
5
Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy for benign indications.腹腔镜和机器人辅助良性指征子宫切除术术后尿潴留的危险因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;120(3):581-6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182638c3a.
6
Risk factors for urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后尿潴留的危险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3140-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4039-z. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
7
Long-term effects of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection on urinary retention in rectal cancer.腹腔镜盆腔侧方淋巴结清扫术对直肠癌患者尿潴留的长期影响
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):999-1007. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08364-7. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗直肠癌患者的结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Sep 3;409(1):269. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03460-3.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术联合侧方淋巴结清扫治疗中晚期直肠癌的系统评价与 Meta 分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 29;19(5):e0304031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304031. eCollection 2024.
10
Influence of Robotic Rectal Resection Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Resection on Postoperative Ileus: A Single-center Experience.机器人直肠切除术与腹腔镜直肠切除术对术后肠梗阻的影响:单中心经验。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Aug 1;32(4):425-430. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001056.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-term Outcomes of Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Lower Rectal Cancer.机器人辅助下低位直肠癌侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术的短期疗效
Fukushima J Med Sci. 2025 Apr 19;71(2):97-103. doi: 10.5387/fms.24-00039. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
2
Predictive model of the surgical difficulty of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective study.直肠癌机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术手术难度预测模型:一项多中心回顾性研究
J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 8;19(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02180-6.
3
Effect of incision location and type of fistula on postoperative urinary retention after radical surgery for anal fistula: a retrospective analysis.
切口位置和瘘管类型对肛瘘根治术后尿潴留的影响:回顾性分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03435-0.
4
Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗直肠癌患者的结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Sep 3;409(1):269. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03460-3.
5
The effect of robotic surgery on low anterior resection syndrome in patients with lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.机器人手术对低位直肠癌患者低位前切除综合征的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):1912-1921. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10676-3. Epub 2024 Feb 7.