强化治疗使基线收缩压较高和弗莱明翰风险较低的患者死亡率增加。

Increased mortality with intensive control in patients with higher baseline SBP and lower Framingham risk.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu City.

Cardiovascular Center and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2022 May 1;40(5):978-984. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003100. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), the relative reduction in primary outcome with intensive blood pressure (BP) control was numerically smallest in the highest baseline SBP tertile. In this post hoc analysis of SPRINT, the goal was to explore whether the effects of intensive BP treatment varied among patients with different baseline SBP and cardiovascular risks.

METHODS

Patient-level data from 9361 randomized participants in SPRINT were used. Heterogeneity between treatment and patient characteristics were examined stratified by different baseline SBP levels. Cumulative incidences of primary outcome and all-cause death were compared between treatment groups for patients with baseline SBP at least 160 mmHg and lower Framingham risk.

RESULTS

For participants with a baseline SBP of at least 160 mmHg, intensive treatment was associated with a higher rate of all-cause death as compared with standard treatment (1.86 vs. 1.62% per year). After adjustment for age and sex, intensive treatment was associated with significantly increased all-cause death compared with standard treatment [hazard ratio (95% CI) for intensive group: 3.12 (1.00-9.69); P = 0.049] in participants with an SBP of at least 160 mmHg and a Framingham risk score of 31.3% or less (average of median and geometric mean). Patient outcomes were otherwise similar regarding age, use of antihypertensive therapy, cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease.

CONCLUSION

Among the SPRINT participants with a baseline SBP of at least 160 mmHg and a lower Framingham risk score, targeting an SBP of less than 120mmHg compared with less than 140mmHg resulted in a significantly higher rate of all-cause death.

摘要

目的

在收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)中,强化血压(BP)控制对主要结局的相对降低作用在基线收缩压最高三分位组中最小。本研究是 SPRINT 的事后分析,目的是探讨强化 BP 治疗的效果是否在不同基线收缩压和心血管风险的患者中存在差异。

方法

使用 SPRINT 中 9361 名随机参与者的患者水平数据。根据不同的基线收缩压水平分层,检查治疗与患者特征之间的异质性。对于基线收缩压至少 160mmHg 且 Framingham 风险较低的患者,比较两组治疗之间主要结局和全因死亡的累积发生率。

结果

对于基线收缩压至少 160mmHg 的参与者,与标准治疗相比,强化治疗组的全因死亡率更高(每年 1.86%比 1.62%)。在校正年龄和性别后,与标准治疗相比,强化治疗与全因死亡显著增加相关[强化组的危险比(95%CI):3.12(1.00-9.69);P=0.049]在基线收缩压至少 160mmHg 且 Framingham 风险评分低于 31.3%(中位数和几何均数的平均值)的患者中。对于年龄、抗高血压治疗的使用、心血管疾病或慢性肾脏疾病,患者结局 otherwise 相似。

结论

在基线收缩压至少 160mmHg 且 Framingham 风险评分较低的 SPRINT 参与者中,与将收缩压目标设定为低于 140mmHg 相比,将收缩压目标设定为低于 120mmHg 会导致全因死亡率显著增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索