• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国采用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)强化血压治疗方案避免的潜在死亡和发生的严重不良事件:来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的预测

Potential Deaths Averted and Serious Adverse Events Incurred From Adoption of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Intensive Blood Pressure Regimen in the United States: Projections From NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey).

作者信息

Bress Adam P, Kramer Holly, Khatib Rasha, Beddhu Srinivasan, Cheung Alfred K, Hess Rachel, Bansal Vinod K, Cao Guichan, Yee Jerry, Moran Andrew E, Durazo-Arvizu Ramon, Muntner Paul, Cooper Richard S

机构信息

From Division of Health System Innovation and Research, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City (A.P.B., R.H.); Department of Public Health Sciences (H.K., R.K., G.C., R.D.-A., R.S.C.) and Division of Nephrology and Hypertension (H.K., V.K.B.), Loyola Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (S.B., A.K.C.); Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City (R.H.); Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (J.Y.); Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (A.E.M.); and School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (P.M.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2017 Apr 25;135(17):1617-1628. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025322. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025322
PMID:28193605
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5404971/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) demonstrated a 27% reduction in all-cause mortality with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal of <120 versus <140 mm Hg among US adults at high cardiovascular disease risk but without diabetes mellitus, stroke, or heart failure. To quantify the potential benefits and risks of SPRINT intensive goal implementation, we estimated the deaths prevented and excess serious adverse events incurred if the SPRINT intensive SBP treatment goal were implemented in all eligible US adults.

METHODS

SPRINT eligibility criteria were applied to the 1999 to 2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and linked with the National Death Index through December 2011. SPRINT eligibility included age ≥50 years, SBP of 130 to 180 mm Hg (depending on the number of antihypertensive medications being taken), and high cardiovascular disease risk. Exclusion criteria were diabetes mellitus, history of stroke, >1 g proteinuria, heart failure, estimated glomerular filtration rate <20 mL·min·1.73 m, or dialysis. Annual mortality rates were calculated by dividing the Kaplan-Meier 5-year mortality by 5. Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality and heart failure and absolute risks for serious adverse events in SPRINT were used to estimate the number of potential deaths and heart failure cases prevented and serious adverse events incurred with intensive SBP treatment.

RESULTS

The mean age was 68.6 years, and 83.2% and 7.4% were non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black, respectively. The annual mortality rate was 2.20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.91-2.48), and intensive SBP treatment was projected to prevent ≈107 500 deaths per year (95% CI, 93 300-121 200) and give rise to 56 100 (95% CI, 50 800-61 400) episodes of hypotension, 34 400 (95% CI, 31 200-37 600) episodes of syncope, 43 400 (95% CI, 39 400-47 500) serious electrolyte disorders, and 88 700 (95% CI, 80 400-97 000) cases of acute kidney injury per year. The analysis-of-extremes approach indicated that the range of estimated lower- and upper-bound number of deaths prevented per year with intensive SBP control was 34 600 to 179 600. Intensive SBP control was projected to prevent 46 100 (95% CI, 41 800-50 400) cases of heart failure annually.

CONCLUSIONS

If fully implemented in eligible US adults, intensive SBP treatment could prevent ≈107 500 deaths per year. A consequence of this treatment strategy, however, could be an increase in serious adverse events.

摘要

背景

收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)表明,在美国心血管疾病高风险但无糖尿病、中风或心力衰竭的成年人中,将收缩压(SBP)目标设定为<120 mmHg对比<140 mmHg可使全因死亡率降低27%。为了量化实施SPRINT强化目标的潜在益处和风险,我们估计了如果在美国所有符合条件的成年人中实施SPRINT强化SBP治疗目标可预防的死亡人数以及由此产生的额外严重不良事件。

方法

将SPRINT纳入标准应用于1999年至2006年的美国国家健康与营养检查调查,并与截至2011年12月的国家死亡指数相联系。SPRINT纳入标准包括年龄≥50岁、SBP为130至180 mmHg(取决于正在服用的抗高血压药物数量)以及心血管疾病高风险。排除标准为糖尿病、中风病史、蛋白尿>1 g、心力衰竭、估计肾小球滤过率<20 mL·min·1.73 m或透析。通过将Kaplan-Meier 5年死亡率除以5来计算年死亡率。使用SPRINT中全因死亡率和心力衰竭的风险比以及严重不良事件的绝对风险来估计强化SBP治疗可预防的潜在死亡人数和心力衰竭病例数以及由此产生的严重不良事件。

结果

平均年龄为68.6岁,分别有83.2%和7.4%为非西班牙裔白人和非西班牙裔黑人。年死亡率为2.20%(95%置信区间[CI],1.91 - 2.48),强化SBP治疗预计每年可预防约107500例死亡(95% CI,93300 - 121200),并导致每年发生56100例(95% CI,50800 - 61400)低血压、34400例(95% CI,31200 - 37600)晕厥、43400例(95% CI,39400 - 47500)严重电解质紊乱以及88700例(95% CI,80400 - 97000)急性肾损伤。极端值分析方法表明,强化SBP控制每年预防死亡人数的估计下限和上限范围为34600至179600例。强化SBP控制预计每年可预防46100例(95% CI,41800 - 50400)心力衰竭病例。

结论

如果在美国符合条件的成年人中全面实施,强化SBP治疗每年可预防约107500例死亡。然而,这种治疗策略的一个后果可能是严重不良事件的增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e3/5404971/17f61b894b59/nihms859121f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e3/5404971/9184bc92f6a5/nihms859121f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e3/5404971/17f61b894b59/nihms859121f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e3/5404971/9184bc92f6a5/nihms859121f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e3/5404971/17f61b894b59/nihms859121f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Potential Deaths Averted and Serious Adverse Events Incurred From Adoption of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Intensive Blood Pressure Regimen in the United States: Projections From NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey).在美国采用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)强化血压治疗方案避免的潜在死亡和发生的严重不良事件:来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的预测
Circulation. 2017 Apr 25;135(17):1617-1628. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025322. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
2
Generalizability of SPRINT Results to the U.S. Adult Population.收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)结果在美国成年人群中的可推广性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 9;67(5):463-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.037. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
3
Applicability and cost-effectiveness of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) in the Chinese population: A cost-effectiveness modeling study.在中国人群中开展收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的适用性和成本效益:一项成本效益建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 4;18(3):e1003515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003515. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Benefit and harm of intensive blood pressure treatment: Derivation and validation of risk models using data from the SPRINT and ACCORD trials.强化血压治疗的益处与危害:利用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)和控制糖尿病患者心血管风险行动(ACCORD)试验数据推导和验证风险模型
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 17;14(10):e1002410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002410. eCollection 2017 Oct.
5
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.
6
Prevalence of Eligibility Criteria for the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial in US Adults Among Excluded Groups: Age <50 Years, Diabetes Mellitus, or a History of Stroke.美国成年人中收缩压干预试验排除组的入选标准患病率:年龄<50岁、患有糖尿病或有中风病史。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jul 12;5(7):e003547. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003547.
7
Influence of Prediabetes on the Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control on Kidney Events.糖尿病前期对强化收缩压控制对肾脏事件影响的影响。
Am J Hypertens. 2019 Nov 15;32(12):1170-1177. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpz105.
8
Influence of baseline systolic blood pressure on the relationship between intensive blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).强化血压控制与心血管结局试验(SPRINT)中基线收缩压对血压控制与心血管结局关系的影响。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Mar;108(3):273-281. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1353-9. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
9
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) and Target Systolic Blood Pressure in Future Hypertension Guidelines.收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)与未来高血压指南中的目标收缩压
Hypertension. 2016 Aug;68(2):318-23. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07575. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
10
Pros and Cons of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Lowering.强化降压治疗的利弊
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018 Mar 6;20(2):16. doi: 10.1007/s11906-018-0806-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of ultra-processed foods consumption with increased liver steatosis in U.S. adults.美国成年人食用超加工食品与肝脏脂肪变性增加之间的关联。
Front Nutr. 2025 Mar 13;12:1536989. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1536989. eCollection 2025.
2
Relationships Matter: Exploring the Impact of Patients' Familial, Community, and Provider Relationships on Hypertension Management.关系很重要:探究患者的家庭、社区及医疗服务提供者关系对高血压管理的影响
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar 21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09470-1.
3
Individualized Net Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in SPRINT.

本文引用的文献

1
Recent Trends in Cardiovascular Mortality in the United States and Public Health Goals.美国心血管死亡率的最新趋势和公共卫生目标。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Aug 1;1(5):594-9. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1326.
2
Potential Mortality Reduction With Optimal Implementation of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor Therapy in Heart Failure.血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂治疗心力衰竭的最佳实施可降低潜在死亡率。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;1(6):714-7. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1724.
3
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)中社区居住的老年人强化降压的个体化净获益
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May;73(5):1441-1453. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19395. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
4
Association of baseline eGFR and incident heart failure on patients receiving intensive blood pressure treatment.接受强化血压治疗患者的基线估算肾小球滤过率与新发心力衰竭的关联。
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Jun;12(3):2148-2156. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15232. Epub 2025 Jan 26.
5
SPRINT Treatment Among Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease From 2 Large Health Care Systems.来自2个大型医疗保健系统的慢性肾病成人患者的强化血压干预治疗(SPRINT)
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453458. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53458.
6
Organizational Determinants to Hypertension Management: Adapting a Health Equity Framework to Examine Processes at Two Academic Health Systems.高血压管理的组织决定因素:采用健康公平框架审视两个学术医疗系统的流程。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(6):1255-1264. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09314-4. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
7
Annual Cost of Implementing Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Goals in the United States.美国实施强化收缩压目标的年度成本。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):e034515. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034515. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
8
Effect of Population-Level Blood Pressure Treatment Strategies on Cardiovascular and Cognitive Outcomes.人群血压治疗策略对心血管和认知结果的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jun;17(6):e010288. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010288. Epub 2024 May 30.
9
Cardiovascular Disease in the Older Adult: Where Are We 4 Decades Later?老年人心血管疾病:四十年后我们处于什么状况?
JACC Adv. 2024 Feb;3(2). doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100820. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
10
Age and sex disparities in blood pressure control and therapeutic inertia: Impact of a quality improvement program.血压控制与治疗惰性方面的年龄和性别差异:一项质量改进计划的影响
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Jan 10;17:100632. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100632. eCollection 2024 Mar.
强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.
4
"Translational" medicine: transforming SPRINT findings into clinical practice.“转化”医学:将SPRINT研究结果转化为临床实践。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016 May;10(5):382-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.03.192. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
5
Current and Future Treatment of Hypertension in the SPRINT Era.SPRINT时代高血压的当前及未来治疗
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2015 Oct-Dec;11(4):206-13. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-11-4-206.
6
A Short History of Automated Office Blood Pressure - 15 Years to SPRINT.自动化诊室血压简史——至SPRINT研究的15年历程
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Aug;18(8):721-4. doi: 10.1111/jch.12820. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
7
The Kaiser Permanente Northern California Story: Improving Hypertension Control From 44% to 90% in 13 Years (2000 to 2013).北加利福尼亚凯撒医疗集团的故事:13年(2000年至2013年)间将高血压控制率从44%提高到90%
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Apr;18(4):260-1. doi: 10.1111/jch.12803. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
8
Effect of antihypertensive treatment at different blood pressure levels in patients with diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analyses.糖尿病患者不同血压水平下降压治疗的效果:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Feb 24;352:i717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i717.
9
Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 7. Effects of more vs. less intensive blood pressure lowering and different achieved blood pressure levels - updated overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials.血压降低对高血压患者结局发生率的影响:7. 强化与非强化血压降低及不同血压达标水平的影响——随机试验的最新综述与荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2016 Apr;34(4):613-22. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000881.
10
Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.降压预防心血管疾病和死亡:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):957-967. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8. Epub 2015 Dec 24.